Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T13:47:45.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adjustment factors for weaning weights of Mashona cattle in Zimbabwe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

V. Buvanendran
V. Buvanendran
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Zimbabwe, PO Box MP 167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effects of year of birth, age of dam, sex of calf, month of birth and weaning age on weaning weights of Mashona calves on six commercial farms in Zimbabwe were estimated by least squares procedures from data of 6365 calves born 1977–85. The least squares mean weight at 205 days among farms ranged from 123 to 159 kg while the linear regression coefficients of weight on age ranged from 0·31 to 0·46 kg. Adjustment for weaning age by the average daily gain from birth to weaning failed to remove the dependence of adjusted weight on age. Sex was the most important source of variation and the mean difference between male and female calves was 12·9 kg. Sex difference was markedly influenced by herd production rate, being greater in herds of above average production.

Weights of calves of 3-, 4- and > 11-year-old dams deviated from those of dams aged 5–10 years (mature) by 14·5, 8·5 and 2·9 kg, respectively. Herd mean influenced the difference between 3-year-old and mature dams, the difference increasing as herd mean declined. Herd-year specific factors seem more appropriate for sex and 3-year-old dams and an annual crop of > 50 calves would confer an advantage to herd-specific over general adjustment factors. On the basis of equality of variances within subclasses, multiplicative factors were superior to additive factors for sex of calf and month of birth; both types of adjustment were suitable for age of dam.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 114 , Issue 1 , January 1990 , pp. 35 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beef Improvement Federation (1972). Guidelines for Uniform Beef Improvement Programs. Raleigh: North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
Creek, H. J. & Nestle, B. D. (1964). Animal production studies in Jamaica. 3. The effect of dam age upon 210-day weights of calves and the response of male and female calves to different environments. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 62, 165–167.Google Scholar
Cundiff, L. V., Willham, R. L. & Pratt, C. A. (1966). Additive versus multiplicative correction factors for weaning weight in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 25, 972–982.Google Scholar
Eikje, E. D. & Johnson, D. L. (1979). Adjustment factors for lamb weaning weight. II. Sources of variation in adjustment factors. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 22, 391–397.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. R. (1960). Least squares analysis of data with unequal subclasses numbers. Agriculture Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture 20–8, 157 pp.Google Scholar
Kassa-Mersha, H. & Arnason, Th. (1986). Non-genetic factors affecting growth of Ethiopian Boran cattle. World Review of Animal Production 22, 45–55.Google Scholar
Koch, R. M., Gregory, K. E., Ingalls, J. E. & Arthaud, R. L. (1959). Evaluating the influence of sex on birth weight and pre-weaning gain in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 18, 738–744.Google Scholar
Lethola, L. L. (1983). Review of Tswana breed of cattle. Animal Genetic Resources in Africa. OAU/STRC/IBAR. Nairobi, pp. 82–86.Google Scholar
Lush, J. L. & Shrode, R. R. (1950). Changes in milk production with age and milking frequency. Journal of Dairy Science 33, 338–357.Google Scholar
Marlowe, T. J., Mast, C. C. & Schalles, R. R. (1965). Some non-genetic influences on calf performance. Journal of Animal Science 24, 494–501.Google Scholar
Mosi, R. O. (1980). Some factors affecting the reliability of within-ranch performance testing of beef bulls in Kenya. MSc thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Nicoll, G. B. & Rae, A. L. (1977). Adjustment factors for Hereford and Angus cattle weights. 1. Weight at weaning. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 20, 269–278.Google Scholar
Oliver, J. (1983). Beef cattle in Zimbabwe 1980–1981. Zimbabwe Journal of Agricultural Research 21, 1–7.Google Scholar
Pabst, W., Kilkenny, J. B. & Langholz, H. J. (1977). Genetic and environmental factors influencing calf performance in pedigree beef cattle in Britain. Animal Production 24, 29–39Google Scholar
Schaeffer, L. R. & Wilton, J. W. (1974). Comparison of the effectiveness of multiplicative and additive adjustment factors in pre-weaning average daily gain of beef cattle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 54, 519–532.Google Scholar