Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T14:51:24.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Use of a simple model to study factors affecting the size distribution of tubers in potato crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

K. Z. Travis
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biology, University of Cambridge, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3DX

Summary

A simple mathematical model of the distribution of potato tuber yield between size grades is presented. It has two parameters, μ, a measure of crop tuber size and σ, a measure of the spread of yield across size grades. The model is shown to be useful for the analysis of field experiments, the prediction and physiological study of tuber size distribution, and the economic analysis of management decisions. The model is applied to a variety of dataandthe practical control of tuber size discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boyd, D. A. & Lessells, W. J. (1954). The effect of seed rate on the yield of potatoes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 44, 465476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstall, L., Thomas, M. N. & Allen, E. J. (1986). Improving upon saleable yield. Potato World 3 (1), 1012.Google Scholar
Draper, N. R. & Smith, H. (1981). Applied Regression Analysis, 2nd edn.New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. & Yates, F. (1963). Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research, 6th edn.London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hanley, F., Jarvis, R. H. & Ridgman, W. J. (1965). The effects of fertilizers on the bulking of Majestic potatoes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 65, 159169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, R. H. & Shotton, F. E. (1968). Population studies with Majestic potatoes in rows and in beds. Experimental Husbandry 16, 7392.Google Scholar
Marshall, B. & Thompson, R. (1986). Tuber-size distribution. Potato Research 29, 261262.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1982). Seed Rate for Potatoes Grown as Maincrop, Leaflet 653. Alnwick, Northumberland: M.A.F.F.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1984). Potatoes: for Processing as Crisps and French fries—Recent Developments, Booklet 2339. Alnwick, Northumberland: M.A.F.F.Google Scholar
Morris, G. E. L. & Currah, I. E. (1983). Weight, size and shape relationships and their uses in the study of graded yield data. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100, 211220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Institute of Agricultural Botany (1985). Recommended Varieties of Potatoes, 1986, Farmers' leaflet No. 3. Cambridge: N.I.A.B.Google Scholar
Pohjonen, V. & Paatela, J. (1976). Optimum planting interval as affected by size distribution in potato yield. Ada Agriculturae Scandinavica 26, 137143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, G. J. S. (1980). MLP Maximum Likelihood Program (Version 3.06). Harpenden: The Statistics Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station.Google Scholar
Sands, P. J. & Regel, P. A. (1983). A model of the development and bulking of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.). V. A simple model for predicting graded yields. Field Crops Research 6, 2540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, R. K. & Younger, A. (1972). Potato agronomy in a changing industry. Outlook on Agriculture 7, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travis, K. Z. (1986). Factors affecting the size distribution of tubers in potato crops. M.Sc. thesis, University of Cambridge, 193 pp.Google Scholar
Wurr, D. C. E. (1977). Some observations of patterns of tuber formation and growth in the potato. Potato Research 20, 6375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar