Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T20:20:57.056Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the storage of potatoes. III. The composition of the atmosphere in a potato clamp

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

E. M. Crook  and
D. J. Watson
E. M. Crook
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts
D. J. Watson
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The CO2 concentration in the atmosphere of a potato clamp varied between 0·06 and 0·86%. The sum of CO2 and oxygen concentrations remained approximately constant at 21%. The CO2 concentration increased with time from December to April. This was attributed to increase in the rate of respiration of the potatoes caused by rise of temperature. Wind blowing in the direction normal to the face of the clamp reduced the COa concentration, presumably by causing external air to flow through the clamp coverings. A multiple regression of CO2 concentration on temperature of the potatoes at the time of sampling, and on the mean component of wind velocity normal to the clamp face estimated over a period of 3 hr. before the time of sampling, accounted for 64% of the variance between sampling occasions.

Unsaturated compounds were detected in the clamp atmosphere by absorption in bromine; the concentration of these, expressed as ethylene, varied between 0·004 and 0·025%.

The magnitude of CO2 accumulation and oxygen depletion in the clamp atmosphere was too small to produce effects of practical importance on the storage behaviour of the potatoes. If the unsaturated compounds were ethylene, the concentration present was sufficient to cause appreciable retardation of sprouting.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , July 1950 , pp. 227 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barker, J. (1936). Rep. Food Invest. Bd., Lond. (1935), p. 118.Google Scholar
Barker, J. & Wallace, E. R. (1946). J. Pomol. 22, 189.Google Scholar
Crook, E. M. & Watson, D. J. (1950). J. Agric. Sci. 40, 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denny, F. E. & Thornton, N. C. (1941). Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. 12, 79.Google Scholar
Huelin, F. E. (1933). Rep. Food Invest. Bd, Lond. (1932), p. 51.Google Scholar
Lunge, G. & Keane, C. A. (1931). Technical Methods of Chemical Analysis, 2nd ed., 3, 611. London: Gurney and Jackson.Google Scholar
Miller, E. V., Winston, J. R. & Fisher, D. F. (1940). J. Agric. Res. 60, 269.Google Scholar
Thornton, N. C. (1939). Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. 10, 339.Google Scholar
Van Slyke, D. D. & Sendroy, J. (1932). J. Biol. Chem. 95, 509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar