Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T12:12:27.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some factors affecting voluntary food intake in buffaloes. 2. Effect of feeding mixed diets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. L. Taparia  and
V. V. Sharma
A. L. Taparia
Affiliation:
Department of Livestock Production and Management, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, University of Udaipur, Udaipur-313001, India
V. V. Sharma
Affiliation:
Department of Livestock Production and Management, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, University of Udaipur, Udaipur-313001, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Seven non-pregnant Murrah buffalo heifers aged 20–34 months and weighing 170–260 kg were used in a 7 × 4 incomplete latin square design to study the effect of feeding mixed diets on voluntary intake over a period of 84 days. Voluntary intake and rate of passage were determined during the last 10 days and digestibility of feed nutrients during the last 6 days of each 21-day experimental period.

Maize stover, dry grass and wheat straw were fed ad libitum mixed with either a fixed quantity of berseem hay (MH, GH and WH rations, respectively) or concentrates (MC, GC and WC rations, respectively) to total co. 0·80% of body weight (BW). Berseem hay fed free choice mixed with limited (0·70% BW) concentrates (HC ration) comprised another treatment. The mean daily total dry-matter intake (DMI g/kgW0·75) and total digestible nutrient intake (given in parenthesis) by animals were 62·2 (1·94), 72·2 (2·20), 74·3 (2·30), 75·2 (2·94), 79·5 (2·59), 85·9 (2·78) and 88·5 (2·98), respectively on MH, GH, WH, HC, MC, WC and GC rations. The digestible crude protein intake on the HC ration was higher than on the remaining six rations. Feeding a fixed quantity of either berseem hay or concentrates resulted in lower consumption of basal roughages suggesting that the physical capacity of the gut limited intake.

Dry-matter digestibility (%) and mean retention time (h), given in parenthesis, were 57·6 (69·4), 56·3 (64·6), 56·7 (67·5), 72·2 (79·9), 59·2 (620), 59·4 (620) and 58·9 (66·0), respectively on MH, GH, WH, HC, MC, GC and WC rations. The digestibilities of D.M. and proximate principles, except crude fibre (CF), of the HC ration were higher than those of the remaining six mixed diets. Concentrate feeding tended to hasten the movement of digesta of the roughage portion of the mixed diet through the digestive tract. The longest mean retention and rumen retention times were associated with the highest digestibilities. The wheat straw-berseem hay mixed diet was as good as dry grass or maize stover-berseem hay mixed diets with regard to its nutrient intake and weight gain by the heifers.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 95 , Issue 1 , August 1980 , pp. 159 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blaxter, K. L., Wainman, F. W. & Davidson, J. L. (1966). The voluntary intake of food by sheep and cattle in relation to their energy requirements for maintenance. Animal Production 8, 75–83.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Wilson, R. S. (1962). The voluntary intake of roughages by steers. Animal Production 4, 351–358.Google Scholar
Campling, R. C. (1964). Factors affecting voluntary intake of grass. Journal of the British Grassland Society 19, 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campling, R. C. (1966). The control of voluntary intake of food in cattle. Outlook on Agriculture 5, 74–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campling, R. C. & Murdoch, J. C. (1966). The effect of concentrates on voluntary intake of roughages by cows. Journal of Dairy Research 33, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, W. G. & Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental Design. London: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Conrad, H. R., Hibbs, J. W. & Pratt, A. D. (1966). Regulation of feed intake in dairy cows. II. Association between digestible dry matter intake and cellulose digestibility in cows fed increasing level of grain concentrate. Journal of Dairy Science 49, 1038–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Shazly, K., Dehority, B. A. & Johnson, R. R. (1961). Effect of starch on the digestion of cellulose in vitro and in vivo by rumen microorganisms. Journal of Animal Science 20, 268–273.Google Scholar
Head, M. J. (1953). The effect of quality and quantity of carbohydrate and protein in the ration of sheep on the digestibility of cellulose and other constituents of the ration. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 43, 281–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, D. (1969). Supplementing corn silage. Journal of Dairy Science 52, 859–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, W., Reid, D., MacLusky, D. S., Waite, R. & Watson, J. N. (1957). Winter feeding of dairy cows. 4. The influence of four levels of concentrate feeding in addition to a basal ration of grass products on the production obtained from milking cows. Journal of Dairy Research 24, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leaver, J. D. (1973). Rearing of dairy cattle. 4. Effect of concentrate supplementation on the live-weight gain and feed intake of calves offered roughages ad libitum. Animal Production 17, 43–52.Google Scholar
Miller, W. J., Clifton, C. M., Miller, J. K. & Fowler, P. R. (1965). Effects of feeding unlike forages, singly and in combination, on voluntary dry matter consumption and performance of lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 48, 1046–1052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, M. J., Culvahouse, E. W. & Henderson, H. A. (1971). Effect of concentrate supplementation on the voluntary intake of high and lowquality forages. Journal of Dairy Science 54, 772–776.Google Scholar
Sharma, V. V., Jhanwar, B. M. & Taparia, A. L. (1972). Utilization of sorghum stover by cattle. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 42, 480–487.Google Scholar
Singh, S. P., Sharma, V. V. & Jhanwar, B. M. (1972). Utilization of low-grade roughages by buffaloes. I. Barley and molasses as supplements to maize stover fed with urea or groundnut cake. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 42, 673–680.Google Scholar
Taparia, A. L. & Davey, A. W. F. (1970). The effect on food intake and milk production of adding concentrates to the ration of pasture-fed cows. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 13, 616–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taparia, A. L. & Sharma, V. V. (1980). Some factors affecting voluntary food intake in buffaloes. 1. Effect of feeding long-chopped and ground roughages. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. (1964). Symposium on nutrition and forage and pastures: New chemical procedures for evaluating forages. Journal of Animal Science 23, 828–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar