Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-gndc8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T06:53:24.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pre- and post-natal wool follicle development and density in sheep of five genotypes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. E. Hocking Edwards ,
M. J. Birtles ,
P. M. Harris ,
A. L. Parry ,
E. Paterson ,
G. A. Wickham  and
S. N. McCutcheon
J. E. Hocking Edwards
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
M. J. Birtles
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology and Anatomy, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
P. M. Harris
Affiliation:
Ag Research, Private Bag 11008, Palmerston North, New Zealand
A. L. Parry
Affiliation:
Ag Research, Flock House, Private Bag 1900, Bulls, New Zealand
E. Paterson
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology and Anatomy, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
G. A. Wickham
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
S. N. McCutcheon
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The pre-natal and post-natal development of wool follicles in sheep of five genotypes with contrasting wool types was examined to provide data on which to base studies of physiological factors affecting wool type via follicle development. This study was conducted following Autumn mating in 1992 at Palmerston North, New Zealand (40° S, 176° E). The rate and timing of follicle development in midside skin samples from Romney, Merino, Merino × Romney (M × R), Drysdale and Wiltshire foetuses and lambs collected at weekly intervals from days 76 to 143 of gestation and 1, 3, 7, 12 and 32 weeks after birth were examined.

Primary (P) follicle density had a similar pattern of development in each of the genotypes, although the Merino had a significantly greater density of P follicles than the other genotypes. There was a difference in the rate of P follicle maturation between genotypes with the Drysdale, Wiltshire and M × R completing P follicle maturation before the other two genotypes. However, the majority of P follicles in all genotypes were producing fibres by 111 days of gestation. It was concluded that the small differences in the density and time of development of the P follicles could not cause the differences in wool type between genotypes.

The pattern of development of the secondary (S) follicle population was examined by comparing S: P ratios. The initiation of S follicles began at similar ages in the five genotypes, but initiation was completed earlier in the Romney, Drysdale and Wiltshire than in the Merino and M × R, as indicated by a significant genotype by age interaction (P < 0·001). There was no difference between genotypes in S:P ratio from 90 to 104 days of gestation. The S:P ratio of the Romney, Drysdale and Wiltshire did not change significantly from 104 days of gestation until the end of the study, indicating that few S follicles were initiated in these genotypes after 104 days of gestation. The M × R data showed a significant increase in S:P ratio until 119 days of gestation and the Merino S:P ratio increased until 126 days of gestation.

The period between days 90 and 125 of gestation was identified as being the critical period for the development of different follicle populations in Merino and non-Merino genotypes and it is this period which should be the focus for studies to determine physiological factors controlling secondary follicle development.

Type
Animals
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 126 , Issue 3 , May 1996 , pp. 363 - 370
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Auber, L. (1952). The anatomy of follicles producing woolfibres with special reference to keratinisation. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 52, 191–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auber, L. & Ryder, M. L. (1955). Anomalies in structure and development of wool fibres. Proceedings of the International Wool Textile Research Conference Volume F, pp. F36–F62.Google Scholar
Brown, G. H., Turner, H. N. & Dolling, C. H. S. (1968). Vital statistics for an experimental flock of Merino sheep. V. The effects of age of ram, maternal handicap, and year of measurement on 10 wool and body characteristics for unselected rams. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 19, 825–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, H. B. (1943). Studies in the biology of the skin and fleece of sheep. 1. The development and general histology of the follicle group in the skin of the Merino. Bulletin of the Council of Science and Industrial Research of Australia No. 164.Google Scholar
Carter, H. B. & Clarke, W. H. (1957 a). The hair follicle group and skin follicle population of Australian Merino sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 8, 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, H. B. & Clarke, W. H. (1957 b). The hair follicle group and skin follicle population of some non-Merino breeds of sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 8, 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, H. B. & Hardy, M. H. (1947). Studies in the biology of the skin and fleece of sheep. 4. The hair follicle group and its topographical variation in the kin of the Merino foetuses. Bulletin of the Council of Science and Industrial Research of Australia No. 215.Google Scholar
Carter, H. B. & Tibbits, J. P. (1959). Post-natal growth changes in the skin follicle population of the New Zealand Romney and N-type sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science 52, 106–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, J. L. (1979). Variation in wool growth with physiological state. In Physiological and Environmental Limitations to Wool Growth (Eds Black, J. L. & Reis, P. J.), pp. 79–98. Armidale: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Davis, G. P. & McGuirk, B. J. (1987). Genetic relationship between clean wool weight, its components and related skin characters. In Merino Improvement Programs in Australia (Ed. McGuirk, B. J.), pp. 189–206. Melbourne: Australian Wool Corporation.Google Scholar
Duerden, J. E. (1939). The arrangement of fibre follicles in some mammals with special reference to the Ovidae. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 59, 763–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everitt, G. C. (1967). Residual effects of prenatal nutrition on the postnatal performance of Merino sheep. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 27, 52–68.Google Scholar
Fraser, A. S. (1954). Development of the skin follicle population in Merino sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 5, 737–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, A. S. & Short, B. F. (1960). The Biology of the Fleece. Technical Paper, No. 3, Animal Research Laboratories, CSIRO, Australia.Google Scholar
Galpin, N. (1935). The pre-natal development of the coat of the New Zealand Romney lamb. Journal of Agricultural Science 25, 344–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, M. H. & Lyne, A. G. (1956). The pre-natal development of wool follicles in Merino sheep. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 9, 423–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. & Mellor, D. J. (1983). Effects of maternal nutrition on the initiation of secondary follicles in foetal sheep. Comparative Pathology 93, 577–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malan, A. P. & Curson, H. H. (1936). Studies in sex physiology. No. 16. Surface area in the foetus of the Merino sheep. Onderstepoorl Journal of Veterinary Science and Animal Industry 7, 251–259.Google Scholar
Orwin, D. F. G. (1961). Bundles offollicles in adult Romney ewes. Nature 190, 1026–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, J. M. (1954). Development of the follicle population in N-type sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 5, 484–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryder, M. L. (1956). The pre-natal development of follicle population in the Romney lamb. Journal of Agricultural Science 47, 6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryder, M. L. & Stephenson, S. K. (1968). Wool Growth. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sailer, S., Cottam, Y. H., Purchas, R. W. & McCutcheon, S. N. (1995). Developmental patterns of muscle, bone and organ growth in foetal lambs of five genotypes. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 38, 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sas (1988). User's Guide: Statistics and Procedures, Version 6. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis System Institute.Google Scholar
Schinckel, P. G. (1953). Follicle development in the Australian Merino. Nature 171, 310–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schinckel, P. G. & Short, B. F. (1961). The influence of nutritional level during pre-natal and early post-natal life on adult fleece and body characters. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 12, 176—202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, S. K. (1957). Wool follicle development in the New Zealand Romney and N-type Sheep. I. The relationships of development to age in the New Zealand Romney and N-type sheep foetuses and a comparison with results obtained from the Merino. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 8, 371–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, S. K. (1958). Wool follicle development in the New Zealand Romney and N-type sheep. II. Follicle population density during foetal development. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 9, 138–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, S. K. (1959). Wool follicle development in the New Zealand Romney and N-type sheep. V. The pre-natal relationships between growth, skin expansion, and primary follicle number. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 10, 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, G. & Slee, J. (1965). Maternal and genetic influences on follicle and fleece development in Lincoln and Welsh Mountain sheep–a study involving egg transfer. Animal Production 7, 333–345.Google Scholar
Williams, P. M. & Henderson, A. E. (1971). Effect of nutrition of the dam on wool follicle development of Corriedale lambs. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 31, 114–120.Google Scholar