Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T13:39:29.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Minimizing volatilization and leaching losses of nitrogen by different nitrogen carriers in Japanese mint (Mentha arvensis L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Muni Ram ,
B. N. Chatterjee ,
R. L. Yadav  and
D. V. Singh
Muni Ram
Affiliation:
Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Lucknow-226016, India
B. N. Chatterjee
Affiliation:
Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Lucknow-226016, India
R. L. Yadav
Affiliation:
Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Lucknow-226016, India
D. V. Singh
Affiliation:
Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Lucknow-226016, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Japanese mint, an important essential-oil-bearing crop, is cultivated for menthol used in cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries. It requires a high level of nitrogen fertilizer, between 150 and 250 kg N/ha depending on the agro-climatic conditions (Ghosh & Chatterjee, 1976; Yadav, Mohan & Ram, 1983). During the crop cycle (January–August), frequent irrigations and high intensive rains result in poor N recovery especially on light-textured soils. With a view to reduce losses of N and improve N recoveries, the relative efficiency of neem-cake-coated urea, laccoated urea and urea supergranules has been investigated in comparison with prilled urea in Japanese mint.

Type
Short Notes
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 110 , Issue 2 , April 1988 , pp. 415 - 418
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Black, C. A., Evans, D. D., White, J. L., Ensmingar, L. E. & Clark, P. F. (1965). Methods of Soil Analysis, part II. Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Engelstad, O. P. & Russel, D. A. (1975). Fertilizer use under tropical conditions. Advances in Agronomy 27, 175–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, A. B., Kjeldby, M. & Nilsen, S. (1985). The effect of intermittent flooding on the growth and yield of wetland rice and nitrogen loss mechanism with surface-applied and deep-placed urea. Plant and Soil 84 (3), 387–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, M. L. & Chatterjee, S. K. (1976). Effect of NPK fertilizers on growth, development and essential oil content of Mentha species. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 14, 366–368.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1967). Soil Chemical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Khandelwal, K. C, Singh, D. P. & Kapoor, K. K. (1977). Mineralization of urea coated with neem extract and response of wheat. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 47 (6), 267–270.Google Scholar
Nommik, H. (1973). Assessment of volatilization of ammonia from surface-applied urea of forest soil by N15 recovery. Plant and Soil 38, 589–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patro, G. K., Sahoo, B. C. & Mohati, K. (1975). Direct residual and combined effect of various slow release nitrogenous fertilizers in rice—rice rotations. Mysore Journal of Agriculture Science 9, 503–509.Google Scholar
Prakasa Rao, E. V. S. & Bhat, P. R. (1984). Ammonia volatilization losses from prilled urea, urea super granules and sulphur coated urea when surface applied and deep placed. Fertilizer News 29 (7), 31–32.Google Scholar
Prakasa Rao, E. V. S. & Prasad, R. (1980). Nitrogen leaching losses from conventional and new nitrogenous fertilizers in lowland rice culture. Plant and Soil 57, 383–392.Google Scholar
Sahrawat, K. L. (1982). Comparative evaluation of Karanjin and extract of Karanja (Pongamia glabra) and of nitrification of urea in soil. Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science 30 (2), 107–115.Google Scholar
Sannigrahi, A. K. & Mandal, L. N. (1984). Influence of slow release nitrogenous fertilizers on the growth and yield of rice, its nitrogen uptake and leaching loss of nitrogen in waterlogged soils. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 54 (1), 45–50.Google Scholar
Savant, N. K., Craswbll, E. T. & Diamond, R. B. (1983). Use of urea super granule for wetland rice: a review Fertilizer News 28 (8), 27–35.Google Scholar
Sharma, S. N. & Singh, A. (1980). Response of Japanese mint to nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. Indian Journal of Agronomy 25, 428–432.Google Scholar
Singh, A. & Balyan, S. S. (1975). Effect of nitrogenous fertilizers on the fresh herb, oil yield and oil content of Mentha arvensis L. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2, 311–313.Google Scholar
Sudhakara, K. & Prasad, R. (1986). Relative efficiency of prilled urea, urea super granules (USG) and USG coated with neem cake or DCD for direct-seeded rice. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 106, 185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yadav, R. L., Mohan, R. & Ram, M. (1983). Yield and quality of essential oil of Mentha arvensis L. as affected by N-rates and row spacing. Madras Agriculture Journal 70(7), 454–457.Google Scholar