Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T08:50:47.994Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Magnesium metabolism in the dairy cow. I. Metabolism on stall rations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. A. F. Rook ,
C. C. Balch  and
C. Line
J. A. F. Rook
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfleld, near Reading
C. C. Balch
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfleld, near Reading
C. Line
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfleld, near Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The results are reported of a series of 8-day magnesium metabolism trials carried out with milking cows fed a variety of typical winter stall rations.

2. Twelve cows fed a standard ration of 15 lb. hay plus 12 lb. of a concentrate mixture containing 3 parts dredge corn, 1 part bran, 1 part decorticated groundnut meal and 1 lb./cwt. Churn 105 minerals, showed variations in the proportion of the feed magnesium excreted in the faeces of from 66·53 to 76·98%, probably reflecting individual differences in the capacity of animals to absorb magnesium.

3. Wide differences in the utilization of the magnesium in typical winter rations were observed. Mean values, with a standard error, obtained for the proportion of the feed magnesium excreted in the faeces with various types of ration were as follows: hay plus concentrates, 71·48 ± 0·94; hay plus proprietary dairy cubes, 62·15 ± 2·73%; hay, proprietary dairy cubes plus decorticated groundnut meal, 91·98 ± 1·93%; hay, silage (1) plus concentrates, 79·53 ± 0·99%; hay, silage (2) plus concentrates, 74·07 ± 4·24%; hay, mangolds plus concentrates, 74·28 ± 5·91%.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , October 1958 , pp. 189 - 198
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allcroft, W. M. (1947). Vet. J. 103, 157.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C., Bartlett, S. & Johnson, V. W. (1951). J. Agric. Sci. 41, 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, C. C., Head, M. J., Line, C., Rook, J. A. F. & Rowland, S. J. (1956). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 15, x.Google Scholar
Bartlett, S., Brown, B. B., Foot, A. S., Rowland, S. J., Allcroft, R. & Parr, W. H. (1954). Brit. Vet. J. 110, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & McGill, R. F. (1956). Vet. Rev. & Annot. 2 (1), 35.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Rook, J. A. F. (1954). J. Comp. Path. 64, 176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breirem, K., Ender, F., Halse, K. & Slagsvold, L. (1949). Acta agric. Suec. 3 (2), 89.Google Scholar
Brouwer, E. (1952). Brit. Vet. J. 108, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbery, M., Chatterjee, I. & Talapatra, S. K. (1937). Indian J. Vet. Sci. 7, 155.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. (1952). Analyst, 77, 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryerre, H. (1936). Vet. J. 92, 163.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. B. & Beegle, F. M. (1916). Bull. Ohio Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 295.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. B., Beegle, F. M., Fritz, C. M., Morgan, L. E. & Rhue, S. N. (1917). Bull. Ohio Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 308.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. B., French, R. B. & Letonoff, T. V. (1928–1929). J. Nutr. 1, 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, E. B., Halverson, J. O. & Morgan, L. E. (1918). Bull. Ohio Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 330.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. B., Schulz, J. A., Hunt, C. H., Winter, A. R. & Remler, R. F. (1922). J. Biol. Chem. 52, 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godden, W. (1935). Tech. Commun. Bur. Anim. Nutr. Aberd. no. 9.Google Scholar
Green, H. H. (1948). N.V.M.A. Publ. no. 17, p. 60.Google Scholar
Green, H. H. (1950). Proc. VIIIth Oongr. int. Industr. Agric., Brussels, 2, 71.Google Scholar
Head, M. J. & Rook, J. A. F. (1957). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 16, 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latteur, J. P. (1953). Rev. Agric. Brux. 6, 899.Google Scholar
McCance, R. A. & Widdowson, E. M. (1942). J. Physiol. 101, 350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendel, L. B. & Benedict, S. R. (1909). Amer. J. Physiol. 25, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, H. G., Brandt, P. M. & Jones, R. C. (1924). Amer. J. Physiol. 69, 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, H. G., Yates, W. W., Jones, R. C. & Brandt, P. M. (1925). Amer. J. Physiol. 72, 647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monroe, C. F. (1924). J. Dairy Sci. 7, 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monroe, C. F. & Perkins, A. E. (1925). J. Dairy Sci. 8, 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, A. E. & Monroe, C. F. (1925). Bull. Ohio agric. Exp. Sta. p. 376.Google Scholar
Ray, S. N. (1942). Indian J. Vet. Sci. 12, 204.Google Scholar
Shohl, A. T. (1939). Mineral Metabolism Monogr. Ser. Amer. Chem. Soc. no. 82. New York: Reinhold Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Sjollema, B. (1932). Tijdschr. Diergeneesk. 59, 57, 329.Google Scholar
Sjollema, B. & Seekles, L. (1933). Arch. wiss. prakt. Tierheilk. 66, 60.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. B. & Holmes, W. (1953). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 4, 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, H. E. (1952). Bull. Minist. Agric., Lond., no. 40.Google Scholar