Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T10:36:20.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The fungicidal properties of certain spray-fluids. III

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

E. Horton  and
E. S. Salmon
E. Horton
Affiliation:
Research Department, S.E. Agric. College, Wye, Kent.
E. S. Salmon
Affiliation:
Research Department, S.E. Agric. College, Wye, Kent.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The following solutions were tested with respect to their fungicidal properties towards the “powdery,” conidial stage of S. Humuli on young hop-leaves in the greenhouse:

(1) Disodium arsenate, containing 0·096 per cent. As2O5 proved fungicidal and killed also patches of leaf-cells underlying the mildewpatches, but did not otherwise injure the leaf. A solution containing 0·02 per cent. As2O5 was fungicidal without killing any leaf-cells.

(2) Trisodium arsenate containing 0·077 per cent. As2O5 proved fungicidal.

(3) Dicalcium arsenate. containing 0·048 per cent. As2O5 proved fungicidal; containing 0·024 per cent. As2O5 the solution was apparently just fungicidal, but with 0·01 per cent. As2O5 the solution was practically non-fungicidal.

(4) Tricalcium arsenate containing 0·076 per cent. As2O5 is fungicidal; containing 0·02 per cent. As2O5 it possesses some fungicidal value, but with 0·01 per cent. As2O5 it is practically non-fungicidal.

(5) The following constituents of lime-sulphur wash proved nonfungicidal: calcium sulphate, sulphite, thiosulphate, hydroxyhydrosulphide.

(6) Calcium polysulphide, at a strength of 0·11 per cent., proved fungicidal.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , July 1922 , pp. 269 - 279
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1922

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

(1)Eyre, J. V. and Salmon, E. S.The Fungicidal Properties of Certain Sprayfluids (Journ. Agric. Science, 7, 473–507 (1916)).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Eyre, J. V., Salmon, E. S. and Wormald, L. K.The Fungicidal Properties of Certain Sprayfluids (Journ. Agric. Science, II (l.c. 9, 284–307 (1919)).Google Scholar
(3)Waite, M. B.Experiments on the Apple with some New and Little-known Fungicides (U.S. Dept. Agric. Circ. 58 (1910)).Google Scholar
(4)Clinton, G. P.Tests of Summer Sprays on Apples, Peaches, etc. (Connecticut Agric. Exper. Station, Thirty-fifth Ann. Rep. 1911, 347–406 (1912)).Google Scholar
(5)Watkins, O. S.Teste of Lime-Sulphur, Bordeaux mixture and other Sprays (Illinois Stale Circ. 159 (1912)) (Abstr. in U.S.A. Dept. Agric. Exper. Stat. Record, 28, 48 (1913)).Google Scholar
(6)Wallace, E., Blodgett, F. M. and Hesler, L. R.Studies of the Fungicidal Value of Lime-Sulphur Preparations (Agric. Exper. Stat. Cornell Univ. (New York) Bull. 290 (1911)).Google Scholar
(7)Morse, W. J.Spraying Experiments and Studies on Certain Apple Diseases in 1913 (Maine Stat. Bull. 223) (Thirtieth Ann. Rep. Mains, Agric. Exper. Stat. 1914, 1–24 (1914)).Google Scholar
(8)Morse, W. J. and Shapovalov, M.Apple Spraying Experiments in 1914 (Maine Stat. Bull. 240) (Thirty-first Ann. Rep. Maine Agric. Exper. Stat. 1915, 177–196).Google Scholar
(9)Morse, W. J.Arsenate of Lead as a Fungicide for Apple Scab (Phytopathology, 6, 118 (1916)).Google Scholar
(10)Morse, W. J.Apple Spraying Experiments in 1916 and 1917 (Maine Stat. Bull. 271) (Thirty-fourth Ann. Rep. Maine Agric. Exper. Stat. 1918, 101–128).Google Scholar
(11)Sanders, G. E.Arsenate of Lead vs. Arsenate of Lime (Proc. Entomol. Soc. Nova Scotia, 1916, 40–45 (1917)).Google Scholar
(12)Blair, J. C.et alii. Field Experiments in Spraying Apple Orchards. General Summary by B. S. Pickett (Univ. of Illinois Agric. Exper. Stat. Bull. 185 (1916)).Google Scholar
(13)Vermorel, V. and Dantony, E.Sur les bouillies fongicides mouillantes (C. R. 156, 1475–1476 (1913)).Google Scholar
(14)Van Slykk, L. L., Hedges, C. C. and Bosworth, A. W.A Chemical Study of the Lime-Sulphur Wash (N. Y. Agric. Exper. Stat. Bull. 319 (1909)).Google Scholar
(15)Tartar, H. V. and Bradley, C. E.On the Composition of Lime-Sulphur Spray (Journ. Indust. and Engin. Chem. 2, (1910) (Oregon Stat. Research Bull. 3 (1914)).Google Scholar
(16)Ramsay, A. A.The Preparation and Composition of Lime-Sulphur Sprays (Journ. Agric. Science, 6, 194–202 (1914)).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(17)Thompson, F. and Whether, A. C.The Composition of Lime-Sulphur Solutions (Delaware Stat. Bull. 105 (1914)).Google Scholar
(18)Bodnar, J.Chemische Zusammensetzung und Wertbestimmung von Schwefelkalkbrühe (Chem. Zeit. 39, 715 (1915)).Google Scholar
(19)Chapin, R. M.The Chemical Composition of Lime-Sulfur Animal Dips (U.S. Dept. Agric. Bull. 451 (1916)).Google Scholar
(20)Salmon, E. S. and Horton, E.Lime-Sulphur and Calcium Caseinate as a Fungicide (Journ. Min. Agric. 28, 995–999 (1922)).Google Scholar