Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:25:23.400Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using Distance Education in Graduate Programs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Allen M. Featherstone  and
Lynnette M. Brummett
Allen M. Featherstone
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Lynnette M. Brummett
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Get access

Abstract

There has been much hype around online education creating a revolution in education. Studies analyzing the use of distance education at the graduate level have been limited. This article uses Kansas State University's Master of Agribusiness program as a case study. Educational theory related to a distance environment is studied. Development and technology issues related to the Master of Agribusiness program are presented followed by survey information from students. Appropriate administrative and management practices that govern a program are essential to the success of the program.

Keywords

graduate degree programonline educationA2A23QlM2
Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , August 2007 , pp. 285 - 299
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, T. “Toward a Theory of Online Learning.” Theory and Practice of Online Learning. Anderson, T. and Elloumi, F. eds. pp. 33–60. Athabasca, AB, Canada: Athabasca University, 2004.Google Scholar
Bernard, R.M., Abrami, P.C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E.Wade, A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P.A., Fiset, M., and Huang, B.. “How Does Distance Education Compare to Classroom Instruction? A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature.” Review of Educational Research 74,3(2004):379–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boland, M.A., Featherstone, A.M., and Chapman, S.J.. “Characteristics of Master's Programs in Agribusiness Management.” International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 2(1999): 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bransford, J., Brown, A., and Cocking, R.. “How People Learn: Brain, Mind Experience and School.” Internet site: www.nap.edu/html/howpeoplel (Accessed January 22, 2007).Google Scholar
Claxton, C.S., and Murrell, P.H.. Learning Styles: Implications for Improving Educational Practice. College Station, TX: ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4, 1987.Google Scholar
Evosovich, M. Personal Communication, Land O'Lakes, Portland, OR, May 2006.Google Scholar
Gubernick, L., and Eberling, A.. “I Got My Degree Through E-mail.” Forbes 159,12(June 1997):84–90.Google Scholar
Hofer, M. Personal Communication, Western Sugar Cooperative, Denver, CO, December 2006.Google Scholar
Marsh, T. Personal Communication, Self-employed, January 2007.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H., and Lampel, J.. “Matter of Degrees: Do MBAs Make Better CEOs?” Fortune, February 19, 2001, p. 244.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. Personal Communication, McCook Economic Development Corporation, McCook, NE, February 2003.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J., and Fong, C.T.. “The End of Business Schools: Less Success than Meets the Eye.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 1(2002):78–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, T.L.The No Significant Difference Phenomenon. Chapel Hill, NC: Office of Instructional Telecommunications, University of North Carolina, 1999.Google Scholar
Swanson, T. “Will the University Survive?” Internet site: http://www.mises.org/story/2013 (Accessed January 22, 2007).Google Scholar
Wilson, B. “Sense of Community as a Valued Outcome for Electronic Courses, Cohorts, and Programs.” Internet site: http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~bwilson/SenseOfCommunity.html (Accessed January 22, 2007).Google Scholar