No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Structural Change in Higher Education: Implications for Agricultural Economics Academic Programs
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 April 2015
Abstract
Major changes affecting Agricultural Economics include: level and sources of funding, increased accountability, a renewed emphasis on teaching, increasing university and college linkages, an evolving student base, and the continuing adoption of educational technology. Major implications include: broader faculty teaching involvement, agribusiness program development, expanding multidisciplinary majors, Ph.D. program modifications for teacher preparation, expanding professional M.S. degrees, graduate program size and specialization reductions, alternative financing of graduate education, and faculty training in teaching methods. Teaching represents a major growth opportunity for Agricultural Economics, but it remains to be seen whether the discipline takes advantage of this opportunity.
Keywords
- Type
- Invited Papers and Discussions
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1993
References
Bhuiyan, M.A. and Kepner, K. W.. “Developing Future Leaders in Agribusiness Education: Main Challenge of the 1990s.” Staff Paper SP 92-18, Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida, July 1992.Google Scholar
Bloom, Allan. The Closing of the American Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster, Inc., 1987.Google Scholar
Bok, Derek. Higher Learning. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: Harvard University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Boyer, Ernest L.College: The Undergraduate Experience in America. New York: Harper and Row, 1987.Google Scholar
Brandt, J. A. “Paradigm and Paradigm Shifts in Agricultural Economics Graduate Programs.” American Agricultural Economics Association Teaching Workshop, Baltimore, Maryland, Aug. 7-9, 1992.Google Scholar
Comer, D., Weldon, R., and Connor, L. J.. “Paradigms and Paradigm Shifts in Undergraduate Agricultural Economics Education.” American Agricultural Economics Association Teaching Workshop, Baltimore, Maryland, Aug. 7-9, 1992.Google Scholar
Comer, D. “Survey of Graduate Programs in Agricultural Economics.” American Agricultural Economics Association Meeting, 1990.Google Scholar
Commission on Graduate Education in Economics (COGEE), “Report of the Commission on Graduate Education in Economics.” J. Econ. Lit. (1992): 1035-53.Google Scholar
Connor, Larry J. “Land-Grant Undergraduate Programs: They Need Revitalizing.” CHOICES, First Quarter (1989): 12–15.Google Scholar
“The Education of Economics: From Undergraduate to Graduate Study.” J. Econ. Lit. (1991): 1088–1109.Google Scholar
Erven, Bernard L. “Revamping University Curricula - Challenge and Change for Agricultural Economics.” Proceedings of the American Agricultural Economics Association Teaching Workshop. Reno, Nevada, July 25-27, 1986, 39–48.Google Scholar
Hambly, D. I. and Marquardt, R. A.. “Status of US Agribusiness Masters Programs.” Agribusiness: an Int. J. 2(1990): 153–162.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hite, James C. “Discussion: Agricultural Economics Undergraduate and Graduate Curricula: Are W Competitive?” S. J. Agr. Econ. 19(1987) 55–58.Google Scholar
Litzenberg, Kerry K., Carman, Hoy F., Folwell, Raymond J., O'Rourke, Patrick D. and Stout, Thomas. “Recent Experiences in Agricultural Economics Curriculum Reform: The Case of Four Universities,” Proceedings of the American Agricultural Economics Association Teaching Workshop, Reno, Nevada, July 25-27, 1986, 56–61.Google Scholar
Litzenberg, K. K., Gorman, W.D., and E.Schneider, V.. “Academic and Professional Programs in Agribusiness.” Agribusiness: an Int. J. 65(1983) 1060–1064.Google Scholar
Mandershied, Lester V. “Undergraduate Educational Opportunities in the Face of Declining Enrollments,” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 70(1988) 985–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Agribusiness Education Commission, “Agribusiness Education in Transition: Strategies for Change,” Report of the National Agribusiness Education Commission, June 1989.Google Scholar
National Research Council, Agriculture and the Undergraduate. Board of Agriculture, National Academy Press, Washington D.C, 1992.Google Scholar
Nelson A., Gene, “Graduate Programs in Agricultural Economics: Are We at a Crossroad, Or Is The Road Just Getting Wider?” Presidential Address at the Western Agricultural Economics Association Meeting, Colorado Springs, July 1992.Google Scholar
Robbins, L. W. “A Positive Role for Graduate Agribusiness Programs in Agricultural Economics.” W. J. Agr. Econ. 13(1988) 121–127.Google Scholar
Sonka, S. T. “Innovative Curricula for Agribusiness at the Master's Level, Highlighting Joint Agriculture and Business School Programs,” Paper presented to the 1991 Conference of the Farm Foundation.Google Scholar
Schwerkhardt, David and Reinschmiedt, Lynn. “Current Status and Future Prospects for Doctoral Programs in Departments of Agricultural Economics in the Southern Region: Results of a Survey,” Paper presented at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association annual meeting, Lexington, KY, Feb. 1992.Google Scholar
Unpublished Data, “Food and Agricultural Education Information System,” Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 1992.Google Scholar
Wallace, L. T. “Agribusiness Education in the United States: Past Trends and Future.” Agribusiness: an Int. J. 2(1989) 229–236.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolverton, Michael, Cramer, Gail and Hammonnds, Timothy. “Agribusiness: What Is It All About?” Agribusiness 1:1 Spring 1:1(1985).3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar