Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T15:25:00.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Rural Town as a Producing Unit: An Empirical Analysis and Implications for Rural Development Policy*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Harry W. Ayer
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Joe Weidman
Affiliation:
University of Arizona

Extract

Emphasis at nearly all levels of government has been placed on rejuvenating rural areas in terms of their income and employment opportunities. Implicitly this rejuvenation is to occur in rural towns and not on farms, since employment opportunities in farming, while improving in the 1973-1976 time period, are not likely to expand greatly. Popular doctrine to stimulate economies of rural towns is fostered by the observed problems of pollution (air, water, noise), slums and human crowding, crime and traffic congestion associated with many large cities, and the concomitant problems of low income, poor consumer and producer services, and declining job opportunities in numerous rural towns. According to popular political opinion, a more desirable social state could be reached by reversing the migration flow, thereby relieving pressures of large cities and enhancing the standard of living potential in rural areas.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This article is Journal Paper No. 2221 of the Agricultural Experiment Station of the University of Arizona.

References

[1] Aaron, H. and McGuire, M.. “Public Goods and Income Distribution,Econometrics, Volume 38,1970, pp. 907920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Allan, R.G.D. Mathematical Economics (Second Edition), London: MacMillan and Co., Ltd., 1965, pp. 694724.Google Scholar
[3] Alonso, William. “The Economics of Urban Size,Papers of the Regional Science Association, Volume XXVI, 1971, pp. 6783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Beale, Calvin. “The Revival of Population Growth in Nonmetropolitan America,Economic Research Service, U.S.D.A., ERS-605, June 1975.Google Scholar
[5] Denison, Edward. The Sources of Economic Growth in the United States, Supplementary Paper No. 13, Committee for Economic Development, January 1962.Google Scholar
[6] Fuguitt, Glenn. “The Places Left Behind: Population Trends and Policy for Rural America,Rural Sociology, December 1971, pp. 449470.Google Scholar
[7] Gabler, L. R.Population Size as a Determinant of City Expenditures and Employment—Some Further Evidence,Land Economics, May 1971, pp. 130138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Genberg, Hans. “A Value Added Test of City Size Economies,” Mimeograph Paper, University of Chicago, July 1972.Google Scholar
[9] Griliches, Zvi. “Estimates of the Aggregate Agricultural Production Function from Cross-Sectional Data,Journal of Farm Economics, May 1963, pp. 419428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Griliches, Zvi. “The Sources of Measured Productivity Growth: United States Agriculture, 1940-60,Journal of Political Economy, August 1963, pp. 331346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Griliches, Zvi. “Production Functions in Manufacturing: Some Preliminary Results,The Theory and Empirical Analysis of Production, Murry Brown, ed., National Bureau of Economic Research, 1967, pp. 275322.Google Scholar
[12] Gum, Russell and Martin, William E.. “Structure of the Demand for Outdoor Recreation,Land Economics, forthcoming February 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Hamilton, Joel and Reid, R.. “Diseconomies of Small Size Communities and the Cost of Migration: Some Empirical Results,Proceedings of the Western Agricultural Economics Association, 1975, pp. 9297.Google Scholar
[14] Hayami, Y. and Ruttan., V.W.Agricultural Development—An International Perspective, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1971.Google Scholar
[15] Henderson, J. V.Optimum City Size: The External Diseconomy Question,” Mimeograph Paper, Quenn's University, 1972.Google Scholar
[16] Ho, Yhi-Min. Agricultural Development of Taiwan, 1903-1960, Vanderbilt University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
[17] Hirsch, W. Z.The Supply of Urban Public Services,Issues in Urban Economics, Perloff, H. and Wingo, C., eds., Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1968.Google Scholar
[18] Hodge, Gerald. “The Prediction of Trade Center Viability in the Great Plains,Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, (XV), 1965, pp. 87115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19] Hodge, Gerald. “Do Villages Grow?—Some Perspectives and Predictions,Rural Sociology, June 1966, pp. 183196.Google Scholar
[20] Izraeli, Oded. “Differentials in Nominal Income and Prices Between Cities,” Mimeograph, University of Chicago, (date unknown).Google Scholar
[21] Kain, J. F. “Urban Form and the Cost of Urban Services,” Discussion Paper No. 6, Program on Regional and Urban Economics, Harvard University, 1966.Google Scholar
[22] Maital, S.Public Goods and Income Distribution: Some Further Results,Econometrics, Volume 41, May 1973, pp. 561568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23] McGuire, M. and Aaron, H.. “Efficiency and Equity in the Optimal Supply of a Public Good,Review of Economics and Statistics, Volume 51,1969, pp. 3139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24] Plaxico, J.S.Problems of Factor-Product Aggregation in Cobb-Douglas Value Productivity Analysis,Journal of Farm Economics, November 1955, pp. 664675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25] Sahota, G. S.Efficiency of Resource Allocation in Indian Agriculture,A merican Journal of Agricultural Economics, August 1968, pp. 584605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26] Samuelson, P. A.Diagramatic Exposition of a Theory of Public Expenditures,Review of Economics and Statistics, November 1955, pp. 350356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27] Samuelson, P. A.The Pure Theory of Public Expenditures,Review of Economics and Statistics, November 1954, pp. 387398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[28] Talmadge, Herman E.Explanation of the Rural Development Act of 1972,U.S. Government Printing Office, August 31, 1972.Google Scholar
[29] Tolley, G. S.Population Distribution Policy,Paper presented at the Conference on Public Policy Education, Custer, South Dakota, September 1971.Google Scholar
[30] Tolley, G.S.The Welfare Economics of City Bigness,” Urban Economics Report #31, University of Chicago, December 1969.Google Scholar
[31] Valley National Bank of Arizona. Arizona Statistical Review, September 1975.Google Scholar