Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T01:54:53.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of On-Site Time in Recreational Demand for Wilderness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Ram N. Acharya ,
L. Upton Hatch  and
Howard A. Clonts
Ram N. Acharya
Affiliation:
Morrison School of Agribusiness and Resource Management, Arizona State University East, Mesa, AZ
L. Upton Hatch
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL
Howard A. Clonts
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Treatment of time in travel cost models has been a source of contention among economists. The debate persists because welfare estimates, which are the principal objectives of these studies, are highly sensitive to the treatment of time. The present study examines the dual role of on-site time using evidence from two wilderness areas in Alabama. The empirical results comply with the theoretical expectation that on-site time is both a source of utility and cost. The exclusion of on-site time from demand functions results in biased parameter estimates. In particular, it yields smaller own-price coefficients and higher welfare estimates.

Keywords

full incomeon-site timerecreation demandtravel cost modelC24D60J20Q26
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , April 2003 , pp. 159 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bockstael, N.E., Strand, I.E., and Hanemann, W.M.. “Time and the Recreational Demand Model.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 62(May 1987):293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, A.C., and Trivedi, P.. “Econometric Models Based on Count Data: Comparison and Application of Some Estimators and Tests.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 1(1986):29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cesario, F.J., and Knetsch, J.L.. “Time Bias in Recreation Benefit Estimation Models.” Water Resources Research 6(June 1970):700–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clonts, H.A.Characteristics and Preferences of Visitors to Cheaha and Sipsey Wilderness in Alabama: Monitoring for Limits of Acceptable Change. Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Technical Report. Auburn, AL: Auburn University, 1994.Google Scholar
Creel, M.D., and Loomis, J.B.. “Theoretical and Empirical Advantages of Truncated Count Data Estimators for Analysis of Deer Hunting in California.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72(May 1990):434–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuddington, J.T., Johnson, F.R., and Knetsch, J.L.. “Valuing Amenity Resources in the Presence of Substitutes.” Land Economics 57(November 1981):526–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffield, J. “Travel Cost and Contingent Valuation: A Comparative Analysis.” Advances in Applied Macroeconomics, Volume 3. Smith, V.K. and Witte, A.D., eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Freeman, A.M. III. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 1993.Google Scholar
Grogger, J.T., and Carson, R.T.. Models for Counts From Choice Based Samples. San Diego: University of California, 1987.Google Scholar
Hausman, J., Hall, B.H., and Griliches, Z.. “Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents R&D Relationship.” Econometrica 52(1984):909–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, T.G. “Measuring the Cost of Time in Recreation Demand Analysis: Comment.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65 (February 1983):169–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kealy, M.J., and Bishop, R.C.. “Theoretical and Empirical Specifications Issues in Travel Cost Demand Studies.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68(August 1986):660–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, D.M., and Shaikh, S.L.. “Empirical Specification Requirements for Two-Constraint Models of Recreation Choice.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(May 2001):428–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddala, G.S.Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, K.E. “Onsite Time in the Demand for Recreation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74(November 1992):918–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, K.E., and Strand, I.E.. “Measuring the Cost of Time in Recreation Demand Analysis: An Application to Sportfishing.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 63(February 1981):153–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, K.E., and Strand, I.E.. “Measuring the Cost of Time in Recreation Demand Analysis: Reply.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65(February 1983):172–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelsohn, R. “An Application of the Hedonic Travel Cost Framework for Recreation Modeling to the Valuation of Deer.” Advances in Applied Micro-Economics, Volume 3. Smith, V.K. and Witte, A.D., eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Nichols, L.M., Bowes, M., and Dwyer, J.F.. Reflective Travel Time in Travel Cost Based Estimates of Recreation Use and Value. University of Illinois Forestry Res. Rep. No. 78-12, AES, 1978.Google Scholar
Ozuna, T., and Gomez, I.A.Estimating a system of recreation demand functions using a seemingly unrelated Poisson regression approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76,2(1994):356–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, D.H. “The Necessity for Substitute Prices in Recreation Demand Analyses.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 69(Novem-ber 1987):828–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, D. “On Site Samples' Regression: Problems of Non-negative Integers, Truncation and Endogenous Stratification.” Journal of Econometrics 37(1988):211–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, W.D. “Searching for the Opportunity Cost of an Individual's Time.” Land Economics 68(February 1992):107–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V.K., Desvousges, W.H., and Mc-Givney, M.P.. “The Opportunity Cost of Travel Time in Recreation Demand Models.” Land Economics 59(August 1983):259–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T.P. “The Role of Onsite Time in the Demand for Outdoor Recreation (Recreational Time).” Dissertation Abstracts, DAI-A 52/06, 1991.Google Scholar
Ward, F.A. “Measuring the Cost of Time in Recreation Demand Analysis: Comment.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65(February 1983):167–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar