Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T04:09:58.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationships Between Industrialized Agriculture and Environmental Consequences: The Case of Vertical Coordination in Broilers and Hogs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Laura L. Martin  and
Kelly D. Zering
Laura L. Martin
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University
Kelly D. Zering
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University
Get access

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between industrialized production in the pork and broiler industries and the natural environment. Historical perspectives are presented regarding the movement toward increasingly concentrated and coordinated pork and broiler production units in the South. The relationships between animal by-product management and environmental quality, both at the farm level and within a geographic region, are addressed. Using the North Carolina pork industry as a background, current regulations and potential policy implications to protect environmental quality are discussed.

Keywords

industrialized agriculturesustainabilityvertical coordination
Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , July 1997 , pp. 45 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barker, J.C. “Reducing Nutrients from Swine Production Units.” Paper presented at the 1996 Pork Profitability Summit, Myrtle Beach. North Carolina Coop. Ext. Sen, North Carolina State University, 1996.Google Scholar
Barker, J.C., and Zublena, J.P.. “Livestock Manure Nutrient Assessment in North Carolina.” North Carolina Coop. Ext. Sen, North Carolina State University, 1995.Google Scholar
Burt, J.P. “Company Involvement in Emerging Environmental Issues: Federal Perspective.” In Proceedings of the 1996 National Poultry Waste Management Symposium, eds., Patterson, P.H. and Blake, J.P.. Auburn University AL: Auburn University Printing Service, 1996.Google Scholar
Cromwell, G.L., and Coffey, R.D.. “Nutrient Management from Feed to Field.” Paper presented at the World Pork Expo, Des Moines, 9-10 June 1995.Google Scholar
Erikson, A.L. “Challenge of a Changing Pork Industry.” In Symposium: Vertical Coordination in the Pork Industry, eds., Schneidau, R.E. and Duewen, L.A.Westport CT: Avi Publishing Co., 1972.Google Scholar
Good, K. “A Comparative Study of Swine Production Costs by Geographic Region and Size of Operation.” Staff Pap., Dept. of Agr. Econ., Purdue University, 1994.Google Scholar
Grimes, G., and Rhodes, V.J.. “Characteristics of Contractors, Growers, and Contract Production.” Agr. Econ. Rep. No. 1995-6, University of Missouri, 1995.Google Scholar
Havenstein, G.B., Ferket, P.R., Scheideler, S.E., and Larson, B.T.. “Growth, Livability, and Feed Conversion of 1957 vs. 1991 Broilers When Fed ‘Typical’ 1957 and 1991 Broiler Diets.” Poultry Sci. 73(December 1994):1785–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayenga, M.L., Rhodes, V.J., Brandt, J.A., and Deiter, R.E.. The U.S. Pork Sector: Changing Structure and Organization. Ames IA: Iowa State University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Hayenga, M.L., Rhodes, V.J., Grimes, G.A., and Lawrence, J.D.. “Vertical Coordination in Hog Production.” In Concentration in the Red Meat Packing Industry. USDA/Packers and Stockyards Administration, Washington DC, February 1996.Google Scholar
Henry, W.R., and Seagraves, J.A.. “Economic Aspects of Broiler Production Density.” J. Farm Econ. 62(1960):1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, J.R. “Time Line: North Carolina Swine Industry.” Staff Pap., Dept. of Animal Sci., North Carolina State University, 1994.Google Scholar
Martin, L.L. “Pork . . . The Other White Meat? An Analysis of Vertical Coordination and Risk Shifting in the North Carolina Pork Industry.” Unpub. Ph.D. Dissertation, North Carolina State University, 1994.Google Scholar
Powers, L. “Nightmare or a Good Balance?” In Pork ’92. Lenexa KS: Vance Publishing Corp., March 1992.Google Scholar
Pyenson, M. “Turning Manure from a Liability into an Asset.” In Proceedings of the 1992 National Poultry Waste Management Symposium, eds., Blake, J.P., Donald, J.O., and Patterson, P.H.. Auburn University AL: Auburn University Printing Service, 1992.Google Scholar
Rahn, A.P. “Economic Evaluation of Litter Materials and Practices.” In Proceedings of the 1992 National Poultry Waste Management Symposium, eds., Blake, J.P., Donald, J.O., and Patterson, P.H.. Auburn University AL: Auburn University Printing Service, 1992.Google Scholar
Ransom, J.M., and Strickland, R.C.. “Enhancement of Broiler Litter to Improve Fertilizer Quality.” In Proceedings of the 1992 National Poultry Waste Management Symposium, eds., Blake, J.P., Donald, J.O., and Patterson, P.H.. Auburn University AL: Auburn University Printing Service, 1992.Google Scholar
Roy, E.P.Contract Farming U.S.A. Danville IL: The Interstate Printers and Publishers, Inc., 1963.Google Scholar
Roy, E.P. “Lesson from Poultry Coordination Experiences.” In Symposium: Vertical Coordination in the Pork Industry, eds., Schneidau, R.E. and Duewer, L.A.. Westport CT: Avi Publishing Co., 1972.Google Scholar
Tobin, B.E., and Arthur, H.B.. “Dynamics of Adjustment in the Broiler Industry.” Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston, 1964.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). Hogs and Pigs. Pub. No. Mt An 4, USDA/NASS, Washington DC. Various issues, 1989-96.Google Scholar
Watts, G., and Kennett, C.. “The Broiler Industry.” In The Poultry Tribune, Centennial Edition, September 1995, pp. 6–18.Google Scholar