Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T04:46:37.058Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regional Input-Output Models Adjusted by Import-Export Survey Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Bill R. Miller  and
Peng Li Liu
Bill R. Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
Peng Li Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Regional analysis has been accepted as a subdiscipline of economics. The signal importance and outlines of the discipline were perhaps most clearly stated in a survey by Meyer in 1965: He asserted that the most characteristic feature of regional analysis was its pragmatic origin. Regional analytic models seem to have grown out of needs to understand and analyze regional problems, despite significant conceptual and data problems. Conceptually, all classical economic theory is involved. In addition, more modern dimensions of location and equilibrium of multiple economies must be confronted. Data problems are magnified by the spatial dimension, since the accounting series implied for most aggregate analysis is available only on a national basis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , December 1975 , pp. 61 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Andrews, R.B. “Mechanics of the Urban Economic Base: The Base Concept and the Planning Process,” Land Economics, 32:69–84, 1969.Google Scholar
[2] Barnard, J.R. “A Social Accounting System for Regional Development Planning,” Journal of Regional Science, 9:109–115, 1969.Google Scholar
[3] Boyce, D.E., Day, N.D., and McDonald, C. “Metropolitan Plan Making Philadelphia,” Regional Science Research Institute, 1970.Google Scholar
[4] Czamanski, Stanislaw and Malizia, E.E.. “Applicability and Limitations in the Use of National Input-Output Tables for Regional Studies,” The Regional Science Association Papers, 23:65–83, 1969.Google Scholar
[5] Isard, Walter, and Langford, T.W.. Regional Input-Output Study — Recollection and Reflection, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1971.Google Scholar
[6] Leven, C.L., Legles, J.B., and Shapiro, P.. An Analytical Framework for Regional Development Policy, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1970.Google Scholar
[7] Liu, Peng-Li. “An Aggregate Economic Analysis of the Coosa Valley Area of Georgia, 1972,” Unpublished M.S. Thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 1975.Google Scholar
[8] Morrison, W.I., and Smith, P.. “Nonsurvey Input-Output Techniques at the Small Area Level: An Evaluation,” Journal of Regional Science, 14:1–4, 1974.Google Scholar
[9] Massey, D.B. and Cordey-Hayes, M.. “The Use of Models in Structure Planning,” Town Planning Review, 42:28–44, 1971.Google Scholar
[10] Meyer, J.R. “Regional Economics: A Survey,” American Economic Review, Vol. 53 (1963), pp. 19–54.Google Scholar
[11] Miller, B.R., and Langley, L.H. Jr. “Suggested Sectors for Input-Output Models of Rural Areas,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 56, No. 2, May, 1974.Google Scholar
[12] Mustafa, G. and Jones, L.L.. Regional Input-Output Model Using Location Quotients, Departmental Program and Model Documentation, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 1971.Google Scholar
[13] Needleman, L., editor. Regional Analysis, Baltimore, Maryland: Penguin Modern Economics Readings, 1968.Google Scholar
[14] Schaffer, W.A. and Chu, K.. “Nonsurvey Technique for Constructing Regional Interindustry Models,” Papers, Regional Science Association, 23:83–101, 1969.Google Scholar
[15] Tiebout, C.M. “Regional and Interregional Input-Output Models: An Appraisal,” Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 24 (1957), pp. 140–147.Google Scholar