Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T05:23:58.385Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimum Number and Location of Manufacturing Milk Plants to Minimize Marketing Costs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Robert L. Beck  and
J. Don Goodin
Robert L. Beck
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky
J. Don Goodin
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Historically, the manufacturing milk sector has been treated as the residual segment of the dairy industry. Milk for fluid consumption has always had first claim on Grade A milk production and any excess milk has been available for manufactured products. The pricing system for milk reflects the dependence on manufactured products as the residual outlet for excess milk. On-farm quality standards for production are lower for manufacturing milk and thus the farm price is lower. The proportion of whole milk produced as manufacturing grade milk is declining as producers shift to Grade A production. The decline in supply has been accelerated to some extent also by the upgrading of on-farm quality standards in recent years. Many small producers left the industry rather than make the necessary expenditures to upgrade on-farm facilities. In addition, the movement of Grade A milk into the expanding fluid milk markets in the South has resulted in a declining quantity of excess Grade A milk. Consequently, there is excess processing capacity in the manufacturing milk sector.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , July 1980 , pp. 103 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashley, C. R. and Alexander, W. H.. “Optimum Number, Size, and Location of Milk Manufacturing Plants in Louisiana and Mississippi.” DAE Res. Rep. No. 418, Louisiana State University, 1970.Google Scholar
Boehm, W. T. and Conner, M. C.. “Technically Efficient Milk Assembly and Hard Product Processing for the Southeast Dairy Industry.” Res. Div. Bull. 122, Virginia Polytechnic and State University, 1976.Google Scholar
Buccola, S. T. and Conner, M. C.. “Potential Efficiencies Through Coordination of Milk Assembly and Milk Manufacturing Plant Location in the Northeastern United States.” Res. Div. Bull. 149, Virginia Polytechnic and State University, 1979.Google Scholar
Goodin, J. D. “Optimum Number and Location of Manufacturing Milk Plants in Kentucky,” unpublished thesis, University of Kentucky, 1979.Google Scholar
Hinton, T. W. “Optimum Number, Size, and Location of Fluid Milk Processing Plants Needed to Minimize Marketing Costs in a 39 County Geographic Area,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Kentucky, 1964.Google Scholar
Stollsteimer, J. “A Working Model for Plant Numbers and Location.” J. Farm Econ. 45(1964):641–5.Google Scholar
Woolsey, R. E. D. and Swanson, H. S.. Operations Research For Immediate Application. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1975.Google Scholar