Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T23:24:52.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interfiber Competition in Textile Mills Over Time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Ping Zhang ,
Stanley M. Fletcher  and
Don E. Ethridge
Ping Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural & Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas Tech University
Stanley M. Fletcher
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural & Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas Tech University
Don E. Ethridge
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural & Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas Tech University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cotton and synthetic fiber competition in textile mills between 1961-1990 was examined using a time-varying parameter regression model. Results indicate that the structure of demand for cotton is not stable and cotton's share responses to changes in the prices of cotton and synthetic fiber vary over time. Cotton and synthetic fiber competition in textile mill use is essentially between cotton and noncellulosic fiber. Cellulosic fiber is not a cotton competitor.

Keywords

cottonstructural changessynthetic fibertime-varying parameter
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , July 1994 , pp. 173 - 182
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barlowe, R.G. and Donald, J.R.. “U.S. Demand for Cotton: Trend and Prospects.” Cotton and Wool: Situation and Outlook Report. CS-250, March 1971.Google Scholar
Cooley, T.F. and Prescott, E.C.. “Estimation in the Presence of Stochastic Parameter Variation.” Econometrica 44(1976): 167–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooley, T.F. and Prescott, E.C.. “Systematic (Non-Random) Variation Model Varying Regression: A Theory and Some Application.” Ann. Econ and Soci. Meas. 2(1973a):463–73.Google Scholar
Cooley, T.F. and Prescott, E.C.. “An Adaptive Regression Model.” Int. Econ. Rev. 14(1973b):364–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Sam. “Factors Affecting Domestic Mill Demand for Cotton and Apparel Wool.” Cotton and Wool Situation, USDA(September 1972): 25–27.Google Scholar
French, M.K.Effects of Commodity Price Stabilization: An Econometric Analysis of the World Cotton Market. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 1980.Google Scholar
Maddala, G.S. Econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1977, Chapter 17.Google Scholar
Meyer, L.A. and Sanford, S.. “U.S. Cotton Mill Consumption During Period of Economic Contraction and Malaise.” Cotton and Wool: Situation and Outlook Report. CWS-62, Nov. 1990.Google Scholar
Monke, E. and Taylor, L.D.. “International Trade Constraints and Commodity Market Models: An Application to the Cotton Market.” Rev. Econ. and Stat. 67(1985):98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouhiainen, J. “The Problem of Changing Parameter in Demand Analysis and Forecasting.” Eur. Rev. Agr. Econ. 5(1978):349–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, E.J. and Sporleder, T.L.. “Factors Influence Disaggregated Demand for Cotton Fiber at the Mill Level.” Cotton and Wool: Situation and Outlook Report. CWS 53, Sept. 1988.Google Scholar
Sanford, S. “Factors Influencing Total Fiber Consumption and Domestic Mill Demand for Cotton and Wool.” Cotton and Wool: Situation and Outlook Report. CWS-51, March, 1988.Google Scholar
Shui, S. N., Beghin, J. C., and Wohlgenant, M.. “The Impact of Technical Change, Scale Effects, and Forward Ordering on U.S. Fiber. Demand.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 75(1993):632–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swamy, P.A.V.B., Conway, R. K., and LeBlanc, M. R.. “The Stochastic Coefficients Approach to Econometric Modeling Part I: A Critique of Fixed Coefficient Models.” J. Agr. Econ. Res. 40(1988):2–20.Google Scholar
Textile Economic Bureau. Fiber Organon (formerly Textile Organon). Vol. 37 through Vol. 60 (1967–1990).Google Scholar
U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. Cotton and Wool: Situation and Outlook Report. U.S.D.A., ERS, Washington, DC, No. CWS 1 through CWS 62.Google Scholar
Ward, L.F. and King, G.A.. Interfiber Competition with Emphasis on Cotton: Trend and Projection to 1980. U.S.D.A., ERS, Technical Bulletin No. 1487, Dec. 1973.Google Scholar
Ward, R.W. and Tilley, D.S.. “Time Varying Parameters with Random Components: The Orange Juice Industry.” S. J. Agr. Econ. (1980):5–13.Google Scholar