Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T22:21:01.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Price and Quality Differences in Source Differentiated Beef on Market Demand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Youngjae Lee  and
P. Lynn Kennedy
Youngjae Lee
Affiliation:
LSU AgCenter
P. Lynn Kennedy
Affiliation:
LSU AgCenter
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In order to estimate demand elasticities of source differentiated beef in South Korea, this study used the quantity of an endogenous demand system derived through maximizing the economic welfare of market participants including local beef consumers and local and foreign beef suppliers. The demand system is then weighted with respect to quality adjustment parameters to identify the effects of quality differences in source differentiated beef on market demand. As implied by the high relative price of locally produced “Hanwoo” beef, substitutability between local and imported beef is shown to be very weak and the own price elasticity of South Korean beef is shown to be inelastic. Related to quality differences between source differentiated beef, South Korean beef consumers show a preference for Australian beef relative to U.S. and Canadian beef, perhaps due to BSE concerns.

Keywords

beefquality complementquality differencequality substituteF10F11F13
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , April 2009 , pp. 241 - 252
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Byrne, P.J., Capps, O. Jr., Tsai, R., and Williams, G.W. “Policy Implications of Trade Liberalization: The Case of Meat Products in Taiwan and South Korea.” Agribusiness 11,4(1995):297–307.Google Scholar
Diewert, W.E. “Exact and Superlative Welfare Change Indicators.” Economic Inquiry 30,4(1992):565–82.Google Scholar
Hausman, J.A. “Exact Consumer's Surplus and Deadweight Loss.” The American Economic Review 71,4(1981):662–76.Google Scholar
Hayes, D.J., Ahn, H.D., and CP Baumel. “Meat Demand in South Korea: A System Estimate and Policy Projections.” Agribusiness 7,5(1991):433–46.Google Scholar
Henneberry, S.R., and Hwang, S.H. “Meat Demand in South Korea: An Application of the Restricted Source-Differentiated Almost Ideal Demand System Model.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 39,1(2007):47–60.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W., Lawrence, J.L., and Thomas, M.S. “Welfare Comparison Under Exact Aggregation.” The American Economic Review 70,2(1980):268–72.Google Scholar
Jung, M.K., Choi, J.S., Jeon, S.G., Yoo, CH., and Heo, D.. Analysis of Distribution and Consumption in the South Korean Beef Market. Research Report of Korean Rural Economic Institute, Seoul, South Korea, 2002.Google Scholar
Kim, R.B., and Veeman, M.. “Korean Beef Import Preferences: Implications for Trade Patterns in the Twenty First Century.” Presentation Paper, Annual Meetings of the International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium. Auckland, New Zealand: IATRC, 2001.Google Scholar
Kinnucan, H.W., Xiao, H., Hsia, C.J., and Jackson, J.D. “Effects of Health Information and Generic Advertising on U.S. Meat Demand.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(1997):13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korean Customs Services (KCS). Statistical Database for Volume and Value of Imports, Internet site: http://portal.customs.go.kr/kcsipt/portal_link_index.jsp?&portalGoToLink=portals_submam_busme_08&iFrameGoToLink=/CmnPt/jsp/JDCQOOO.jsp (Accessed August 2007).Google Scholar
Korean Statistical Information Service (KOSIS). Internet site: http://www.kosis.kr/domestic/theme/do01_index.jsp (Accessed June 2006).Google Scholar
McGuirk, A., Driscoll, P., Alwang, J., and Haung, H. “System Misspecification Testing and Structural Change in the Demand for Meat.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 20,1(1995):1–21.Google Scholar
Mittelhammer, R.C., Shi, H., and Wahl, T.I. “Accounting for Aggregation Bias in Almost Ideal Demand Systems.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 21(1996):247–62.Google Scholar
Nonghyup (National Agricultural Cooperative Federation of South Korea). Data on Price, Supply and Demand of Livestock Products. Internet site: http://nature.nonghyup.com/live/stock/l_main.jsp (Accessed May 2006).Google Scholar
Sarris, A.H., and Freebairn, J. “Endogenous Price Policies and International Wheat Prices.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65,2(1983):214–24.Google Scholar
Song, J.H., Shin, S.Y., and Kim, CM.. Analysis of South Korean Beef Consumption after BSE Outbreak in the U.S. Research Report of Korean Rural Economic Institute, Seoul, South Korea, 2004.Google Scholar
Von Cramon-Taubadel, S. “A Critical Assessment of the Political Preference Function Approach in Agricultural Economics.” Agricultural Economics 7(1992):371–94.Google Scholar
Wilson, W.W., and Galllagher, P. “Quality Differences and Price Responsiveness of Wheat Class Demands.” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 15,2(1990):254–64.Google Scholar