Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-27T12:46:02.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determinants of Participation and Consumption: The Case of Crawfish in South Louisiana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

S. T. Yen ,
L. E. Dellenbarger  and
A. R. Schupp
S. T. Yen
Affiliation:
Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University
L. E. Dellenbarger
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University Agricultural center
A. R. Schupp
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University Agricultural center
Get access

Abstract

This study investigates the determinants of crawfish consumption in South Louisiana using a generalized limited dependent variable model that accounts for both participation and consumption decisions. Income, Catholic, white, and household size increase the likelihood of crawfish consumption but not the conditional level of consumption. Education and employment status are among the other household characteristics that determine the conditional level of consumption.

Keywords

Box-Cox transformationcrawfish consumptiondouble-hurdle modelSouth Louisiana
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , July 1995 , pp. 253 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amemiya, T., and Boskin, M.. “Regression Analysis When Dependent Variable is Truncated Lognormal, With an Application to the Determinants of the Duration of Welfare Dependency.” Int. Econ. Rev. 15 (June 1974): 485–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amemiya, T., and Powell, J.L.. “A Comparison of the Box-Cox Maximum Likelihood Estimator and the Non-Linear Two Stage Least Squares Estimator.” J. Econometrics 17 (December 1981): 351–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arabmazar, A., and Schmidt, P.. “An Investigation of the Robustness of the Tobit Estimator to Non-normality.” Econometrica 50 (July 1982): 1055–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A.B., Gomulka, J., and Stern, N.H.. “Household Expenditure on Tobacco 1970-1980: Evidence From the Family Expenditure Survey.” ESRC Programme on Taxation, Incentives, and the Distribution of Income, London School of Economics, Discussion Paper No. 60., 1984.Google Scholar
Blundell, R., and Meghir, C.. “Bivariate Alternatives to the Tobit Model.” J. Econometrics 34 (January/February 1987): 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capps, O. Jr., “Consumer Expenditure Patterns for Fish and Shellfish.” Marine Fisheries Rev. 44 (March 1982): 1–6.Google Scholar
Capps, O. Jr.Analysis of Aggregate Fish and Shellfish Expenditure. Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin No. 82-1 and Department of Agricultural Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, May 1982.Google Scholar
Cheng, H., and Capps, O. Jr. “Demand Analysis of Fresh and Frozen Finfish and Shellfish in the United States.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 70 (August 1988): 533–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cragg, J.G. “Some Statistical Models for Limited Dependent Variables with Applications to the Demand for Durable Goods.” Econometrica 39 (September 1971): 829–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draper, N.R., and Cox, D.R.. “On Distributions and Their Transformations to Normality.” J. Royal Statist. Soc. Ser. B 31 (3) (1969): 472–76.Google Scholar
Fuller, W.A.Measurement Error Models. New York: Wiley, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, B.W. “At-Home Consumption of Cheese: A Purchase-Infrequency Model.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 74 (May 1992): 453–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haines, P., Guilkey, D., and Popkin, B.. “Modeling Food Consumption As a Two-Step Decision.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 70 (August 1988): 543–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, N.L., and Kotz, S.. Distributions in Statistics: Continuous Univariate Distributions-1. New York: Wiley, 1970.Google Scholar
Keithley, W.R. Jr. “Socioeconomic Determinants of At-Home Seafood Consumption: A Limited Dependent Variable Analysis of Existing and Latent Consumers.” Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Florida, Gainsville, Florida, 1985.Google Scholar
Lee, L-F., and Maddala, G.S.. “The Common Structure of Tests for Selectivity Bias, Serial Correlation, Heteroscedasticity and Non-normality in the Tobit Model.” Int. Econ. Rev. 26 (February 1985): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, C.-T. J., and Milon, J.W.. “Attribute and Safety Perceptions in a Double-Hurdle Model of Shellfish Consumption.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 75 (August 1993): 724–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, T., and Schmidt, P.. “A Test of the Tobit Specification Against an Alternative Suggested by Cragg.” Rev. Econ. and Statist. 66 (February 1984): 174–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louisiana Cooperative Extension Service (LCES), Unpublished data, 1994.Google Scholar
Maddala, G.S.Limited-dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, J.F., and Moffitt, R.A.. “The Uses of Tobit Analysis.” Rev. Econ. and Statist. 62 (May 1980): 318–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKelvey, R.D., and Zavoina, W.. “A Statistical Model for the Analysis of Ordinal Level Dependent Variables.” J. Mathematical Sociology 4 (1) (1975): 103–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, M.M., and Nash, D.A.. Regional and Other Related Aspects of Shellfish Consumption-Some Preliminary Findings from the 1969 Consumer Panel Survey. National Marine Fisheries Service Circulation No. 361, Washington, D.C, June 1971.Google Scholar
Nash, D.A.A Survey of Fish Purchases of Socio-Economic Characteristics. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries Service Data Rep. No. 62, Washington, DC, April 1971.Google Scholar
Pereira, C. “Analyses of Household Consumption Patterns for Aquacultural and Seafood Species in the United States.” Unpublished M.S. Thesis, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 1990.Google Scholar
Perry, J.S. “An Econometric Analysis of Socioeconomic and Demographic Determinants of Fish and Shellfish Consumption in the United States.” Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Florida, Gainsville, Florida, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poirier, D.J. “The Use of the Box-Cox Transformation in Limited Dependent Variable Models.” J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 73 (June 1978): 284–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poirier, D.J., and Melino, A.. “A Note on the Interpretation of Regression Coefficients Within a Class of Truncated Distributions.” Econometrica 46 (September 1978): 1207–09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, B.M., Guilkey, D.K., and Haines, P.S.. “Food Consumption Changes of Adult Women Between 1977 and 1985.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 71 (November 1989): 949–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pudney, S.E. “Estimating Engel Curves: A Generalization of the P-Tobit Model.” Finnish Econ. Pap. 1 (Autumn 1988): 129–47.Google Scholar
Pudney, S.E.Modelling Individual Choice: The Econometrics of Corners, Kinks, and Holes. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar
Purcell, J.C, and Raunikar, R.. Analysis of Demand for Fish and Shellfish. U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Research Bulletin, No. 51, Washington, DC, December 1968.Google Scholar
Reynolds, A. “Analyzing Fresh Vegetable Consumption From Household Survey Data.” S. J. Agr. Econ. 22 (December 1990): 31–38Google Scholar
Schupp, A.R., and Dellenbarger, L.E.. “Household Consumption Patterns for Louisiana Crawfish.” AEA Information Series, No. 108, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 1993.Google Scholar
Tobin, J. “Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables.” Econometrica 26 (January 1958): 24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Food Consumption, Prices, and Expenditures, 1970-92. Statistical Bulletin No. 867, Economic Research Service, September 1993.Google Scholar
Yen, S.T. “Working Wives and Food Away From Home: The Box-Cox Double Hurdle Model.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 75 (November 1993): 884–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar