Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T08:57:23.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Demand for Plant Nutrients in Tennessee Disaggregated by Mixed Fertilizers and Direct Application Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Roland K. Roberts
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Peter V. Garrod
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Hawaii, Manoa

Abstract

When obtaining nitrogen (N), phosphate (P) and potash (K), purchasing decisions concerning the quantity and the form of each plant nutrient must be made. Logit models are estimated for the choice-of-form decision by considering those variables influencing the probability that plant nutrients will be purchased in Tennessee as part of a mixed fertilizer or as direct application materials. Parameter and elasticity estimates can be used by fertilizer manufacturers and distributors to anticipate changes in the composition of demand for plant nutrients in Tennessee.

Type
Submitted Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amemiya, T.Qualitative Response Models: A Survey.J. Econ. Lit., 14(1981):14831536.Google Scholar
Bartlett, M. S.A Note on the Multiplying Factors for Various x2 Approximations.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 16(1954):296298.Google Scholar
Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., and Welsch, R. E.. Regression Diagnostics, Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1980.Google Scholar
Carman, H. F.The Demand for Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potash Fertilizer Nutrients in the Western United States.West. J. Agr. Econ., 4(1979):2331.Google Scholar
Chiang, A. C. Fundamental Methods of Mathematical Economics. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company, 1967.Google Scholar
Garrod, P. V., and Roberts, R. K.. “Choice of Technology: The Case of Grass Fed Versus Grain Fed Cattle in Hawaii.West. J. Agr. Econ., 8(1983):112123.Google Scholar
Gyawu, E. A., Jones, L. D., Debertin, D. L., and Pagoulatos, A.. An Econometric Analysis of the U. S. Fertilizer Industry. University of Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station, Agricultural Economics Research Report 39, 1984.Google Scholar
Heady, E. O., and Yeh, M. H.. “National and Regional Demand Functions for Fertilizer.J. Farm Econ., 41(1959):332348.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. M., and Quandt, R. E.. Microeconomic Theory. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1971.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. Econometric Methods. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1984.Google Scholar
Miklius, W., Casavant, K. S., and Garrod, P. V.. “Estimation of Demand for Transportation of Agricultural Commodities.Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 58(1976):217223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, R. K.Plant Nutrient Demand Functions for Tennessee with Prices of Jointly Applied Nutrients.So. J. Agr. Econ., 18(1986):107112.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. K., and Heady, E. O.. “Fertilizer Demand Functions for Specific Nutrients Applied to Three Major U.S. Crops.West. J. Agr. Econ., 7(1982):265277.Google Scholar
Tennessee Department of Agriculture. Tennessee Agricultural Statistics: 1984 Annual Bulletin. Tennessee Crop Reporting Service, Bulletin T-21, 1984.Google Scholar
Tennessee Valley Authority. Fertilizer Summary Data. National Fertilizer Development Center, Muscle Shoals, Alabama, 1964-1984.Google Scholar
Theil, H. Principles of Econometrics. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1971.Google Scholar
U. S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Prices: Annual Summary. Statistical Reporting Service, 1964-1984.Google Scholar
U. S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Statistics. Washington, D.C., U. S. Government Printing Office, 1978-1985.Google Scholar
U. S. Department of Agriculture. Inputs Outlook and Situation Report. Economic Research Service, November, 1984.Google Scholar