Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T12:42:23.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Enterprise Competition Analysis of Beef Production in the South

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

James E. Nix ,
Neil R. Martin Jr.  and
John W. Hubbard
James E. Nix
Affiliation:
Commodity Economics Division, Economic Research Service, USDA, stationed at Washington, D.C. and Athens, Georgia
Neil R. Martin Jr.
Affiliation:
Commodity Economics Division, Economic Research Service, USDA, stationed at Washington, D.C. and Athens, Georgia
John W. Hubbard
Affiliation:
Clemson University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Enterprise competition among beef, hog and crop alternatives in the South has been recognized by a number of analysts; Potential enterprise adjustments in this region must be evaluated before reliable decisions affecting the beef industry can be made. This paper is concerned with an appraisal of normative adjustments in southern beef production and related enterprises over an intermediate period of time.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , December 1975 , pp. 95 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Amick, R.J., Allison, J.R., and J.C., Elrod Optimum Organization for General Crop and Crop- Livestock Farms In The Piedmont of Georgia, Georgia Agr. Exp. Sta. Bui. N.S. 133, May 1965.Google Scholar
[2] Berry, John H. “A Method for Handling Pecuniary Externalities in Relating Farm and Aggregate Supply Functions,” Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University, 1969.Google Scholar
[3] Crom, Richard. A Dynamic Price-Output Model of the Beef and Pork Sectors, Economic Research Service U.S. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin No. 1426, September 1970.Google Scholar
[4] Dietrich, Raymond A. Interregional Competition in the Cattle Feeding Economy With Emphasis on Economies of Size, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station B-1115, September 1971.Google Scholar
[5] Hubbard, John W. and Burch, Thomas A.. Aggregate Farm Production and Income Effects of Changes in Cotton Allotments and Prices in South Carolina, South Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 533, July 1967.Google Scholar
[6] Martin, Neil R. Jr. “Stepped Product Demand and Factor Supply Functions in Linear Programming Analyses,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 54 (1972): 116–120.Google Scholar
[7] Martin, Neil R. Jr. “An Economic Model for Appraisal of Beef Production in the Midwest,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois, 1974.Google Scholar
[8] Nix, James E. “Beef Production in the South: Model Development and Economic Appraisal of Beef Supply Response,” Ph.D. Thesis, Clemson University, 1974.Google Scholar
[9] Nix, James E. and Hubbard, John W.. Responses of Beef Production in the South to Changes in Farm-Level Beef Prices, South Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 579, December 1974.Google Scholar
[10] Sharples, Jerry A. “The Representative Farm Approach to Estimation of Supply Response,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 51 (1969), 353–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Sharples, Jerry A., Miller, Thomas A., and Day, Lee M.. Evaluation of a Firm Model in Estimating Aggregate Supply Response, North Central Regional Research Publication No. 179, January 1968.Google Scholar
[12] Southern Cooperative Series. Cotton: Supply, Demand, and Farm Resource Use, Bulletin 110, November 1966.Google Scholar
[13] Southern Cooperative Series. Cotton: The Effects of Allotments on Supply and Farm Resource Use, Bulletin 128, May 1968.Google Scholar
[14] Swanson, E.R. “Programmed Normative Agricultural Supply Response: Establishing Farm-Regional Links,” Economic Models and Quantitative Methods for Decision and Planning in Agriculture, Earl O., Heady, Ed., pp. 229–242, Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
[15] Technical Committee for Regional Research Project S-67. Procedural Guide for Objective II, unpublished paper.Google Scholar
[16] Trierweiler, John E., and Hassler, James B.. Orderly Production and Marketing in the Beef-Pork Sector, Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station Res. Bulletin 240, November 1970.Google Scholar
[17] United States Department of Agriculture, Statistical Reporting Service, Cattle, February 1975.Google Scholar
[18] Wills, Ian R. “Projections of Effects of Modern Inputs on Agricultural Income and Employment in a Community Development Block, Uttar Pradesh, India,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 54 (1972):452–460.Google Scholar
[19] Worden, Gaylord E. “An Interfirm Competition Model for Deriving Empirical Estimates of Supply Response,” Ph.D. Thesis, Iowa State University, 1970.Google Scholar
[20] Yaron, Dan, Yakin, Plessner, and Heady, Earl O.. “Competitive Equilibrium-Application of Mathematical Programming,” California Journal of Agricultural Economics 13 (1965);65–79.Google Scholar