Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-28T07:51:33.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Economic Analysis of Spiny Lobster Production by Individual Firms at Optimum Stock Levels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Get access

Extract

Spiny lobster (Panulirus argus) landings in Florida increased from 1.9 million pounds in 1954 to 6.6 million pounds in 1974 [1], a gain of 239 percent. Florida landings currently account for 94 percent of U.S. spiny lobster landings. Total Florida spiny lobster landings have declined since 1974 for two reasons. First, prohibition of Florida fishermen from lobster fishing on the Bahamian continental shelf reduced landings considerably. Florida landings declined approximately 3.5 million pounds between 1974 and 1975, mainly because of the loss of the domestic landings which were caught in Bahamian waters. Second, domestic landings from Florida waters appear to have reached a maximum in 1974 and have since remained relatively stable or declined slightly.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Fisheries of the United States. Current Fishery Statistics, NMFS, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C, annual issues.Google Scholar
[2]U.S. Congress. Fishery Conservation and Management Act of 1976. 94th Congress, PL 94-265, Washington, D.C, 13 April 1970.Google Scholar
[3]Williams, Joel S.An Economic Analysis of Alternative Management Strategies for the Spiny Lobster Industry,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida, 1976.Google Scholar
[4]Williams, Joel S. and Prochaska, Fred J.. “Maximum Economic Yield and Resource Allocation in the Spiny Lobster Industry,” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 9, Number 1, 1977, pp. 145149.Google Scholar