Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-564cf476b6-2jsqd Total loading time: 0.254 Render date: 2021-06-21T12:45:46.782Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

An Evaluation of Factors Affecting the Choice of Coastal Recreational Activities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Krishna P. Paudel
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University and LSU Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA
Rex H. Caffey
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University and LSU Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA
Nirmala Devkota
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University and LSU Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA
Get access

Abstract

A visitor's decision to use a particular recreational site is influenced by the individual's taste as well as the characteristics of the site. For this reason, improved knowledge of the visitors' interests and factors influencing their choices are vital for both planning and policy formulations in coastal development. This study examines visitor characteristics and desired site-specific characteristics in order to determine the factors affecting use of the Louisiana coast for specific recreational purposes. We use a multinomial logit model and internet survey data to evaluate the factors affecting individuals' decisions to visit coastal Louisiana for a specific use. Results suggest that the major variables affecting the choice of coastal recreational activities include environmental quality of the site, income, and travel time.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Acharya, R.N., Hatch, L.U., and Clonts, H.A.The Role of On-Site Time in Recreational Demand for Wilderness.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 35(2003): 159–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albaladejo-Pina, I.P., and Diaz-Delfa, M.T.Tourist Preferences for Rural House Stays: Evidence from Discrete Choice Modelling in Spain.” Tourism Management 30(2009): 805–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barras, J.A. Land Area Change and Overview of Major Hurricane Impacts in Coastal Louisiana, 2004-08. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3080, scale 1:250,000, 6 p. Phamphlet, 2009. Internet site: http://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/3080/dovraloads/SIM3080.pdf (Accessed January 2, 2011).Google Scholar
Barras, J.A., Bernier, J.C., and Morton, R.A. Land Area Change in Coastal Louisiana: A Multi-decadal Perspective (from 1956 to 2006). U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3019, scale 1:250,000, 14 p. Pamphlet, 2008. Internet site: http://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/3019/ (Accessed January 2, 2011).Google Scholar
Beharry-Borg, N., and Scarpa, R.Valuing Quality Changes in Caribbean Coastal Waters for Heterogeneous Beach Visitors.” Ecological Economics 69(2010): 1124–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bestard, A.B., and Font, A.R.Environmental Diversity in Recreational Choice Modeling.” Ecological Economics 68(2009):2743–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhat, C.R., Sener, I.N., and Eluru, N.A Flexible Spatially Dependent Discrete Choice Model: Formulation and Application to Teenagers' Weekday Recreational Activity Participation.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 44(2010):903–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bockstael, N.I., and Hanemann, M.Time and the Recreation Demand Model.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 69(1987):296302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, A., and Boyd, S.Climate Change and Coastal Tourism in Ireland.” In Disappearing Destinations: Climate Change and the Future Challenges for Coastal Tourism. Edited by Jones, A. and Phillips, M., pp. 125–43. CAB International, Wallingford, U.K. 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutter, W.B., Pendleton, L., and DeShazo, J.R.Activities in Models of Recreational Demand.” Land Economics 83(2007):370–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebi, K.L., Meehl, G.A., Bachelete, D., Twilley, R.R., and Boesch, D.F. Regional Impacts of Climate Change – Four Case Studies in the United States. Arlington, VA: Pew Center on Global Climate Change, 2007, p. 66.Google Scholar
Economics for the Environment Consultancy Limited. Valuation of Benefits to England and Wales of a Revised Bathing Water Quality Directive and Other Beach Characteristics Using the Choice Experiment Methodology. Technical Report, Economics for the Environment Consultancy Limited (EFTEC). U.K.: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, 2002.Google Scholar
Eggert, H., and Olsson, B. “Heterogeneous Preferences for Marine Amenities: A Choice Experiment Applied to Water Quality.” Working Paper. The Department of Economics, Göteborg University, 2005.Google Scholar
Green, W.H. Econometric Analysis, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc., 2002.Google Scholar
Hicks, R.L., and Schnier, K.E.Dynamic Random Utility Modeling: A Monte Carlo Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88(2006):816–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurt, A.S., Achuhmann, P.W., Boyd, R., and Doroodian, D.The Value of Changes in Deer Season Length: An Application of the Nested Model.” Environmental and Resource Economics 19(2001): 131–47.Google Scholar
Leones, J., Colby, B., and Crandall, K.Tracking Expenditures of the Elusive Nature Tourists of Southeastern Arizona.” Journal of Travel Research 36(1998):5664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lew, D.K., and Larson, D.M.Valuing a Beach Day with a Repeated Nested Logit Model of Participation, Site Choice and Stochastic Time Value.” Marine Resource Economics 23(2008): 233–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilley, M.B., Firestone, J., and Kemton, W.The Effect of Wind Power Installations on Coastal Tourism.” Energies 3(2010): 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, J.S. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication Inc., 1997.Google Scholar
Loomis, J., Yorizane, S., and Larson, D.Testing Significance of Multi-Destination and Multipurpose Trip Effects on a Travel Cost Method Demand Model for Whale Watching Trips.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 29(2000): 183–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morey, E., Shaw, W.D., and Watson, M.A Repeated Nested Logit Model of Atlantic Salmon Fishing.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75(1993):578–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association. NRDA by the Numbers: Deepwater Horizon Spill Natural Resource Damage Assessment, December 10, 2010. Internet site: http://www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov/ (Accessed February 18, 2011).Google Scholar
National Survey on Recreation and the Environment Major Findings, 2000. Internet site: http://wamell.forestry.uga.edu/nrrt/nsre/ClemSC907.pdf (Accessed January 2, 2011).Google ScholarPubMed
Parsons, G.R., Massey, D.M., and Tomasi, T.Familiar and Favorite Sites in a Random Utility Model of Beach Recreation.” Marine Resource Economics 14(2000):299315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, P.R., Plantinga, A.J., and Boyle, K.J.Narrow Choice Sets in a Random Utility Model of Recreation Demand.” Land Economics 76(2000):8699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, G., and Thur, S.Valuing Changes in the Quality of Coral Reef Ecosystems: A Stated Preference Study of Scuba Diving in the Bonaire National Marine Park.” Environmental and Resource Economics 40(2008):593608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paudel, K.P., Caffey, R.H., Devkota, N., and Hall, L.M.Opening a Public Recreation Area to Revitalize Coastal Communities and Preserve Natural Resources in Louisiana: The Case of Elmer's Island.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 37(2005):475–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romando, D.Modeling Determinants of Participation, Number of Trips and Site Choice for Outdoor Recreation in Protected Areas.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 51(2000):224–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twilley, R.Gulf Coast Wetland Sustainability in a Changing Climate.” In Regional Impacts of Climate Change Four Case Studies in the United States. Edited by Ebi, K.L., Meehl, G. A., Bachelete, D., Twilley, R.R., and Boesch, D.F., pp. 4251. Arlington, VA: Pew Center on Global Climate Change, 2007.Google Scholar
Vesterinen, J., Pouta, E., Huhtala, A., and Neuvonen, M.Impacts of Changes in Water Quality on Recreation Behavior and Benefits in Finland.” Journal of Environmental Management 91(2010):984–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

An Evaluation of Factors Affecting the Choice of Coastal Recreational Activities
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

An Evaluation of Factors Affecting the Choice of Coastal Recreational Activities
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

An Evaluation of Factors Affecting the Choice of Coastal Recreational Activities
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *