Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-19T00:55:22.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

1890 Institutions in a Changing Socioeconomic Environment: Implications for Human Resource Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2016

Dewitt Jones  and
Alfred L. Parks
Dewitt Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Southern University
Alfred L. Parks
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture atPrairie View A & M University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since their inception, land grant universities have played a vital role in the growth and development of the U.S. economy. Indeed, the land grant model of providing access to and the benefits of higher education to the masses have been effective in raising the standard of living throughout the world. However, it is becoming increasingly clear that the focus of the primary unit (the colleges of agriculture and home economics) of land grant universities must change if it is to remain relevant to society.

Type
Invited Papers and Discussions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , July 1990 , pp. 61 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Black Enterprise. “Careers and Opportunities 1989.” February, 1989:67–70.Google Scholar
Connor, , Larry, J. “Land-Grant Undergraduate Agriculture Programs: They Need Revitalizing.” Choices, First Quarter 1987:12–15.Google Scholar
Gaines-Carter, , Patrice, . “Job Market 2000.” Essence, November, 1988.Google Scholar
Hushak, , Leroy, J. “The Land Grant System: There Can Be A Future.” Choices, Second Quarter 1989:32–33.Google Scholar
Lennon, , Max, . “Some ‘Innocent’ Questions for Land Grant Universities.” Choices, First Quarter 1987:15–17.Google Scholar
Lyons, , Nance, L. “Today's Black College Curriculum Reflects Both Dubois and Washington's Ideas.” Black Issues in Higher Education, October 12,1989:21.Google Scholar
McDowell, , George, R. “Land-Grant Colleges of Agriculture: Renegotiating or Abandoning a Social Contract.” Choices, Second Quarter 1988:18–21.Google Scholar
Mugler, , Dave, et al. “Fall 1987 Enrollment in NASULGC Colleges of Agriculture,” Report prepared for RICOP Division of Agriculture, NASULGC, March, 1988.Google Scholar
O'Brien, , Eileen, M. “HBCUs Promise and Deliver Success to their Students, Officials Say.” Black Issues in Higher Education, October 12,1989:16–17.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, , Wayne, D, and Hildreth, R. J.. “The USDA-Land Grant University System in Transition.” The Form and Food System in Transition, No. 16, Coop. Ext. Service, Michigan State University (not dated).Google Scholar
Schor, , Joel, . “Anachronisms or Rising Stars: The Black Land-Grant College System.” Agriculture and Human Values, 2:3 (Summer, 1985):76–79.Google Scholar
Edward, Schuh G.. “Revitalizing Land Grant Universities: It's Time to Regain Relevance.” Choices, Second Quarter 1986:6–10.Google Scholar
State Times. “Fewer Job Opportunities, Better Pay Likely for Class of 90, Survey Says.” November 8, 1989:A11.Google Scholar
Tevis, , Cheryl, . “Ag Schools Out-of-Step?” Successful Farmer, November, 1989:17.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service and U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Rural and Rural Farm Population: 1988 Population Characteristics. Series P-20, No. 439, Washington, DC, August, 1989.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Population Profile of the U.S. 1989. Series P-23, No. 159, Washington, DC, April, 1989.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Outlook Handbook, 1988-89 Edition. Bulletin 230, Washington, DC, April, 1988.Google Scholar