Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T17:31:22.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Law out of Context: A Comment on the Creation of Traditional Law Discussion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Extract

The ways in which local normative systems and processes of decision-making in Third World states have been interpreted and transformed by colonial and postcolonial lawyers, administrators and social scientists have received much scholarly attention. During the past 15 years in particular, the “creation of traditional law” in Africa and the “myth of adapt” in Indonesia have became a special topic in the writing of legal anthropologists, largely influenced by scholars such as Asad arid Said. In recent years analyses have increasingly focussed upon the economic and political forces and purposes behind the transformations and on their consequences rather than on their underlying ethnocentric conceptual biases.

In his paper “Traditionalism and Traditional Law” in this volume Peter Fitzpatrick presents an elegant, sophisticated and critical account of the main strands of analysis in the discussions about the creation of customary or traditional law. In my comment upon his views and those of other authors which he discusses I am not so much concerned with a critique; I would rather like to expand and amend these views by enlarging the analytical framework in which they should be seen. My concern is with the selectivity of these analyses. Firstly, I think that they usually tend to generalize from a limited (set of) context(s) in which the creation of customary law has been observed, such as adjudication in colonial courts or academic writing and teaching in colonial law.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Burns, P., The Myth of Adat. Paper presented at the Asian Studies Association of Australia. Monash Univ., 1982.Google Scholar

2 Asad, T. (ed.), Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter. London: Ithaca Press, 1983.Google Scholar

3 Said, E., Orientalism. London: Routledge and Kegah Paul, 1978.Google Scholar

4 Bohannan, P., “Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology”. In: Nader, L. (ed.), Law in Culture and Society. Chicago: Aldine, 1969;Google ScholarGluckman, M. “Concepts in the Comparative Study of Tribal Law”. In: Nader, L. (ed.), Law in Culture and Society. Chicago: Aldine, 1969.Google Scholar

5 Vollenhoven, C. van, Miskenningen van net Adatrecht. Leiden: Brill, 1909.Google Scholar

6 See, for example, Woodman, G. R., “Some Realism About Customary Law – the West African Experience”. (1969) Wisconsin Law Review 128;Google Scholar“Customary Law, State Courts and the Notion of Institutionalization of Norms in Ghana and Nigeria”, in: Allott, A. N. and Woodman, G. R. (eds.), People's Law and State Law—The Bellagio Papers. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 1985;Google ScholarBenda-Beckmann, K. von, “Traditional Values in a Non-Traditional Context: Adat and State Courts in West Sumatra”. (1982) Indonesia Circle 27.Google Scholar

7 Chanock, M., “Neo-Traditionalism and Customary Law in Malawi”. (1978) African Law Studies 18.Google Scholar

8 Holleman, J. F., “Trouble-Cases and Trouble-less Cases in the Study of Customary Law and Legal Reform”. (1973) Law and Society Review 7.Google Scholar

9 See Benda-Beckmann, K. von, The Broken Stairways to Consensus: Village Justice and Slate Courts in Minangkabau. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 1984.Google Scholar

10 Galanter, M., “Justice in Many Rooms”, (1981) Journal of Legal Pluralism 19.Google Scholar

11 Benda-Beckmann, F. and Von, K., “Transformation and Change in Minangkabau”. In: Thomas, L. L. and Benda-Beckmann, F. von (eds.), Change and Continuity in Minangkabau: Local, Regional and Historical Perspectives. Athens: Ohio University Mongraphs in International Studies No. 71, 1985.Google Scholar

12 See reference cited in note 9 above.

13 Fitzpatrick, P., “Law, Plurality and Underdevelopment”. In: Sugarman, D. (ed.). legality, Ideology and the State. London and New York: Academic Press, 1983.Google Scholar

14 “Why Law Does Not Behave: Critical and Constructive Reflections on the Social Scientific Perception of the Social Significance of Law”l. In: H. Finkler (comp.), Proceedings of the Symposium on Folk Law and Legal Pluralism, XIth IUAES Congress, Vancouver, Ottawa, 1983, pp. 242, 243.Google Scholar

15 See, e.g. Werbner, R. P., “The Quasi-Judicial and the Experience of the Absurd: Remaking Land Law in North-Eastern Botswana”. In: Werbner, R. P. (ed.), Land Reform in the Making: Tradition, Public Policy andldeology in Botswana [1980] J.A.L., Special Number;Google ScholarColdham, S.The Effect of Registration of Title Upon Customary Land Rights in Kenya”, [1978] J.A.L. 22.Google Scholar

16 See reference cited at note 15 above, at p. 131.

17 But see reference cited at note 9 above, at p. 103fF.

18 Hooker, M. B., Legal Pluralism: An Introduction to Colonial and Neo-Colonials Laws. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.Google Scholar

19 See reference cited at note 6, above.

20 At p. 21 above.

21 See also reference cited at note 13, above.

22 See, Okoth-Ogendo, H. W. O., The Political Economy of law—An Essay in the Legal Organization of Underdevelopment in Kenya, 1895–1974. J. S. Dissertation. Yale Law School (unpublished), 1978;Google ScholarDevelopment and the Legal Process in Kenya: An Analysis of the Role of Law in Rural Development Administration” (1984) International Journal of Sociology of Law 12:Google ScholarSnyder, F., Capitalism and Legal Change: An African Transformation. New York: Academic Press, 1981;Google Scholar for Indonesia see: Breman, J., Control of Land and Labour in Colonial Java. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 1983.Google Scholar

23 “Introduction”. In: Allott, A. N. and Woodman, G. R. (eds.), People's Law and State Law—The Bellagio Papers. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24 See, for example, West Sumatra: von Benda-Beckmann, F., Property in Social Continuity: Continuity and Change in the Maintenance of Property Relationships in Minangkabau, West Sumatra. The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 1979; and the reference at note 23, above.Google Scholar

25 See Comaroff, J., “Class and Culture in a Peasant Economy: The Transformation of Land Tenure in Barolong”. In: Werbner, R. P. (ed.), Land Reform in the Making: Tradition, Public Policy and Ideology in Botswana, [1980] J.A.L., Special Number.Google Scholar