Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-02T06:34:29.153Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reflection, the Public, and the Modern Machine: An Investigation of the Fukushima Disaster in Relation to the Concepts of Truth and Morality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2017

KOSUKE SHIMIZU
KOSUKE SHIMIZU*
Affiliation:
Ryukoku University, Japanshimizu@world.ryukoku.ac.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In March 2011, Japan suffered a massive earthquake. The resultant tsunami hit the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear reactor and it was later revealed that the reactor was actually in a state of meltdown. While it is still unclear how many people will be affected, both mentally and physically, by the radio-active fallout, the extent to which our lives are subject to the unimaginable risks of scientific technology has become patently clear. This paper strives to clarify the risks of scientific technology in relation to instrumental reason, critical thinking, plurality, and subsequently, the significance of the public realm in contemporary world affairs, with a specific focus on the Fukushima incident. In so doing, I shall introduce arguments regarding scientific technology by such thinkers as Arendt, Heidegger, and Horkheimer as well as the Kyoto School philosophers. This paper also focuses on the issue of morality in order to address the notion of the lack of critical thinking and the disappearance of the public.

Type
Research Article
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , December 2017 , pp. 536 - 551
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arendt, Hannah (1958), The Human Condition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah (1971), The Life of the Mind, San Diego: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah (1977), Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (2007), Practical Reasoning and Ethical Decision, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cox, Robert (1981), ‘Social Forces, States and World Order: Beyond International Relations Theory’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10 (2): 126–55.Google Scholar
The Independent Investigation Commission on the Fukushima Nuclear Accident (2012), ‘The Official Report, available at the Secretariat of the National Diet of Japan Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission’, https://apinitiative.org/en/project/fukushima/ (accessed 6 September 2013).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin (1977), The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, William Lovitt, trans., New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max (1989), ‘Notes on Science and the Crisis’, in Bronner, Stephen E. and Kellner, Douglas M. (eds.), Critical Theory and Society Reader, New York: Routledge, pp. 52–7.Google Scholar
Imamura, Hitoshi (2008), ‘Boryoku Izen no Chikara: Boryoku no Kongen’ [The Power before Violence: The Origin of Violence], in Toru, Tani et al. (eds.), Boryoku to Ningen Sonzai [Violence and Human Existence], Tokyo: Chikumashobo.Google Scholar
Investigation Committee on the Accident at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations (ICAF) (2012), ‘Investigation Report’, http://www.cas.go.jp/jp/seisaku/icanps/post-2.html (accessed 6 September 2013).Google Scholar
Japanese Association of Science and Technology Journalists (JASTJ) (2012), Yotsuno ‘Jikocho’ wo Hikaku Kenshosuru: Fukushima Genpatsujiko no 13 no Naze [Comparative Investigation of the Four Accident Reports: 13 Whys of the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Accident], Tokyo: Suiyosha, Chapter 13.Google Scholar
Masao, Maruyama (1961), Nihon no Shiso [Japanese Thoughts], Tokyo: Iwanami.Google Scholar
Najita, Tetsuo (1989), ‘On Culture and Technology in Postmodern Japan’, in Miyoshi, Masao and Harootunian, H. D. (eds.), Postmodernism and Japan, Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Nishida, Kitaro (1947), ‘Zen no Kenkyu’ [The Inquiry into the Good], Nishida Kitaro Zenshu [Collected Works of Nishida Kitaro], Vol. 1.Google Scholar
Nishida, Kitaro (1952), ‘Daishinsai no Atoni’ [After the Great Kanto Earthquake], Nishida Kitaro Zenshu [Collection of Nishida Kitaro], Vol. 13, Tokyo: Iwanami, pp. 128–9.Google Scholar
Rebuild Japan Initiative Foundation (RJIF) (2012), The Independent Investigation Commission on the Fukushima Nuclear Accident, Tokyo: Discover 21.Google Scholar
Tokyo Electric Power Company (2012), ‘The Investigation Report of the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Accident’, http://www.tepco.co.jp/cc/press/betu12_j/images/120620j0303.pdf (accessed on 1 February 2016).Google Scholar
Tosaka, Jun (1966a), Tosaka Jun Zenshu [Collected Works of Tosaka Jun], Vol. 1, Tokyo: Keisoshobo.Google Scholar
Tosaka, Jun (1966b), Dotoku no Kannen [The Idea of Morals], in Tosaka Jun Zenshu Vol. 4 [Collected Works of Tosaka Jun], Vol. 4, Tokyo: Keisoshobo.Google Scholar
Wago, Ryoichi (2013), from his Twitter @wago 2828 on 6/September/2013 by permission.Google Scholar