Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:38:13.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Asian Multilateralism in the Age of Japan's ‘New Normal’: Perils and Prospects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2015

SEE SENG TAN*
Affiliation:
Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological UniversityISSSTan@ntu.edu.sg

Abstract

This paper makes three related points. First, Japan has played an instrumental role in helping to define the shape and substance of multilateralism in Asia in ways deeper than scholarly literature on Asia's regional architecture has allowed. A key driving force behind Japan's contributions is the perceived utility of multilateralism in facilitating Japan's engagement of and/or balancing against China. Second, Japan has been able to achieve this because of the United States' support for Asian multilateralism and Japanese security interests. In the immediate post-Cold War period, Japan facilitated US participation in regional arrangements such as the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation and the ASEAN Regional Forum. But Japanese ambivalence over its dependence on the United States was also apparent in Tokyo's attempts to exclude Washington from the newly formed East Asia Summit in late 2005, despite Japan's felt need to balance China. Japan's reliance on quiet diplomacy and an implicit regional leadership has equally been instrumental to its achievements in regional integration. Third, in the light of Japan's longstanding aim to become a normal military power and adopt a more assertive policy toward China, Japan‒US security ties are likely to deepen with negative consequences for Asian multilateralism. However, if its ties with China and South Korea worsen over their islands disputes in the East China Sea, Japan risks undermining its relations with the United States. How Japan balances its normalization with a continued engagement with multilateralism could be key to a stable and secure Asia.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abe, S. (2014), ‘Keynote Address’, The 13th IISS Asia Security Summit: The Shangri-La Dialogue, 30 May, International Institute for Strategic Studies, London.Google Scholar
Abe, S. (2013), ‘Japan is Back’, speech given at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, DC, 22 February, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan.Google Scholar
Acharya, A. (2010), ‘Asia-Pacific Security: Community, Concert of What?’, PacNet, 11, 12 March.Google Scholar
Agence, France-Presse (2013), ‘Japan to Give Patrol Boats to Manila amid China Tensions’, South China Morning Post, 1 February.Google Scholar
Ashizawa, K. (2013), Japan, the US, and Regional Institution-Building in the New Asia: When Identity Matters, Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ba, A. D. (2006), ‘Who's Socializing Whom? Complex Engagement in China-ASEAN Relations’, The Pacific Review, 19 (2): 157‒79.Google Scholar
Baker, G. and Schlesinger, J. M. (2014), ‘Abe's Strategy: Rearrange Region's Power Balance’, The Wall Street Journal, 26 May.Google Scholar
Beeson, M. (2003), ‘ASEAN Plus Three and the Rise of Reactionary Regionalism’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 25 (2): 251‒68.Google Scholar
Berkofsky, A. (2012), A Pacifist Constitution for an Armed Empire, Milan: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
Börzel, T. A. and Risse, T. (2009), Diffusing (Inter-) Regionalism: The EU as a Model of Regional Integration, KFG Working Paper 7, September, Berlin: Free University.Google Scholar
Bosco, J. A. (2013), ‘Entrapment and Abandonment in Asia’, The National Interest, 8 July.Google Scholar
Bremmer, I. (2014), ‘Japan's Path Forward, in Five Steps’, Reuters, 9 May, http://blogs.reuters.com/ian-bremmer/2014/05/09/japans-path-forward-in-five-steps/.Google Scholar
Breslin, S. (2010), ‘Comparative theory, China, and the future of East Asian regionalism(s)’, Review of International Studies, 36 (3): 709–29.Google Scholar
Buszynski, L. and Roberts, C. B. (2013), The South China Sea: Stabilization and Resolution, Occasional Paper, Canberra: National Security College, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Callahan, W. A. (2012), China: The Pessoptimist Nation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cha, V. D. (2011), ‘Complex Patchworks: US Alliances as Part of Asia's Regional Architecture’, Asia Policy, 11.Google Scholar
Claude, I. L. (1989), ‘The Balance of Power Revisited’, Review of International Studies, 15 (2): 7785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, T. (2014), ‘Abe and the Re-Militarization of Japan’, Counterpunch, 1 April, http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/04/01/abe-and-the-re-militarization-of-japan/.Google Scholar
Clinton, H. R. (2010), ‘Remarks on Regional Architecture in Asia: Principles and Priorities’, US Department of State, 12 January, m.state.gov/md135090.htm.Google Scholar
Cronin, P. M., Ratner, E., Coby, E., Hosford, Z. M., and Sullivan, A., (2014), Tailored Coercion: Competition and Risk in Maritime Asia, Washington, DC: Center for New American Security.Google Scholar
Drifte, R. (1998), Japan's Foreign Policy for the 21st Century: From Economic Superpower to What Power? Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Edström, B. (2011), Japan and Human Security: The Derailing of a Foreign Policy Vision, Asia Paper, March, Stockholm: Institute for Security and Development Policy.Google Scholar
Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, M. and Verdier, D. (2005), ‘European Integration as a Solution to War’, European Journal of International Relations, 11 (1): 95135.Google Scholar
Emmers, R. (2003), Cooperative Security and the Balance of Power in ASEAN and the ARF, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Emmers, R., Liow, J. C., and Tan, S. S. (2011), The East Asia Summit and the Regional Security Architecture, Maryland Series in Contemporary Asian Studies 3–2010 (202), College Park, MD: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Emmers, R. and Tan, S. S. (2011), ‘The ASEAN Regional Forum and Preventive Diplomacy: Built to Fail?’, Asian Security, 7 (1): 4460.Google Scholar
Finkel, J., Menn, J., and Viswanatha, A. (2014), ‘US Accuses China of Cyber Spying on American Companies’, Reuters, 19 May, http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/05/19/us-cybercrime-usa-china-idUSBREA4I09420140519.Google Scholar
Fujiwara, K. (2003), ‘Prioritizing Japan‒US Relations or a Multilateral Diplomacy?’, The Asahi Shimbun, 27 September.Google Scholar
Futori, H. (2013), ‘Japan's Disaster Relief Diplomacy: Fostering Military Cooperation in Asia’, Asia-Pacific Bulletin, 213, 13 May.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (2007), America at the Crossroads: Democracy, Power, and the Neoconservative Legacy, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Good, C. (2009), ‘The Obama Doctrine: Multilateralism With Teeth’, The Atlantic, 10 December.Google Scholar
Gowan, R. and Jones, B. (2009), ‘Mr Obama Goes to New York: The President and the Restoration of Multilateral Diplomacy’, Brookings Report, 17 September.Google Scholar
Green, M. J. (2006), ‘US‒Japanese Relations after Koizumi: Convergence or Cooling?’, The Washington Quarterly, 29 (4): 101‒10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, M. J. (1999), ‘Managing Chinese Power: The View from Japan’, in Johnston, A. I. and Ross, R. S. (eds.), Engaging China, Abingdon, Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grenville, S. (2014), ‘The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Where Economics and Geopolitics Meet’, The Lowy Interpreter, 4 March, http://www.lowyinterpreter.org/post/2014/03/04/Trans-Pacific-Partnership-Where-economics-and-geopolitics-meet.aspx?COLLCC=3559796430&.Google Scholar
Haggard, S. D. (2013), ‘The Organizational Architecture of the Asia-Pacific: Insights from the New Institutionalism’, in Kahler, M. and MacIntyre, A. (eds.), Integrating Regions: Asia in Comparative Context, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Haass, R. (2008), ‘The Age of Non-polarity: What Will Follow US Dominance’, Foreign Affairs, 87 (3): 4456.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Y. (2013), ‘Abe Tells Obama Japan Will Boost Its Defense’, The Wall Street Journal, 22 February.Google Scholar
Heydarian, R. J. (2014), ‘The Dangers of Asian Nationalism: Why Washington Should Be Alarmed’, The World Post, 20 May, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/richard-javad-heydarian/the-dangers-of-asian-nati_b_5348254.html.Google Scholar
Hirose, S. (2014), ‘Shinzo Abe's Biggest Enemy: the LDP’, The Diplomat, 14 April, http://thediplomat.com/2014/04/shinzo-abes-biggest-enemy-the-ldp/.Google Scholar
Hook, G. D. (2009), ‘Japan in the World’, in Tsutsui, W. M. (ed.), A Companion to Japanese History, Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hook, G. D. (1998), ‘Japan and the ASEAN Regional Forum: Bilateralism, Multilateralism or Supplementalism?’, Japanstudien, 10.Google Scholar
Hook, G. D., Gilson, J., Hughes, C. W. and Dobson, H. (2001), Japan's International Relations: Politics, Economics, and Security, 2nd edn, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hughes, C. W. (2009), ‘Japan's Response to China's Rise: Regional Engagement, Global Containment, Dangers of Collision’, International Affairs, 85 (4): 837‒56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, C. W. (2007), Japan's Re-emergence as a ‘Normal’ Military Power, Adelphi Series 368–9, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. J. (2000), After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jimbo, K., Sahashi, R., Takahashi, S., Sakata, Y., Masuda, M., and Yuzawa, T. (2011), Japan's Security Strategy toward China: Integration, Balancing, and Deterrence in the Era of Power Shift, Tokyo: The Tokyo Foundation.Google Scholar
Johnston, A. I. (2003), ‘Is China a Status Quo Power?’, International Security, 27 (4): 556.Google Scholar
Johnston, A. I. and Evans, P. (1999), ‘China's Engagement with Multilateral Security Institutions’, in Johnston, A. I. and Ross, R. (eds.), Engaging China, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kagan, R. (2002), ‘Multilateralism, American Style’, The Washington Post, 13 September.Google Scholar
Kawai, M. and Wignaraja, G. (2008), ‘EAFTA or CEPEA’, ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 25 (2): 113‒39.Google Scholar
Kelly, T. (2014), ‘US Backs Militarization of Japan in Response to China’, Reuters, 5 April, http://www.businessinsider.sg/r-hagel-backs-japan-plan-to-bolster-self-defense-2014-04/#.U7ZOXY_2NMs.Google Scholar
Khong, Y. F. (2004), ‘Coping with Strategic Uncertainty: The Role of Institutions and Soft Balancing in Southeast Asia's Post-Cold War Strategy’, in Suh, J. J., Katzenstein, P. J., and Carlson, A. (eds.), Rethinking Security in East Asia: Identity, Power, and Efficiency, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Koh, T. (2009), ‘Rudd's Reckless Regional Rush’, The Australian, 18 December.Google Scholar
Lam, P. E. (2006), ‘Japan's Human Security Role in Southeast Asia’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 28 (1): 141‒59.Google Scholar
Lind, J. M. (2004), ‘Pacifism or Passing the Buck?: Testing Theories of Japanese Security Policy’, International Security, 29 (1): 92121.Google Scholar
Little, R. (1989), ‘Deconstructing the Balance of Power: Two Traditions of Thought’, Review of International Studies, 15 (2): 87100.Google Scholar
Lipscy, P. (2003), ‘Japan's Asian Monetary Fund Proposal’, Stanford Journal of East Asian Affairs, 3 (1): 93104.Google Scholar
Manning, R. (2013), ‘US Rebalancing Asia, Not Containing China’, Global Times, 8 July.Google Scholar
Marquardt, E. (2013), ‘Japan's Nationalism Risks its Power Position in East Asia’, World Security Network, 5 April, http://www.worldsecuritynetwork.com/Japan-Asia/Marquardt-Erich/Japans-Nationalism-Risks-its-Power-Position-in-East-Asia.Google Scholar
Medeiros, E. S. (2005/06), ‘Strategic Hedging and the Future of Asia-Pacific Stability’, The Washington Quarterly, 29 (1): 145‒67.Google Scholar
Meltzer, J., Okubo, T., Jackson, B., and Sheehan, J. (2014), ‘TPP: What's at Stake with the Trade Deal?’, BBC News, 22 April, http://www.bbc.com/news/business-27107349.Google Scholar
Merand, F. and Hofmann, S. (2011), ‘Regional Institutions a la Carte: Mechanisms of Variable Geometry in Europe’, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association Annual Conference, Montreal, 16 March.Google Scholar
Midford, P. (2011), Rethinking Japanese Public Opinion and Security: From Pacifism to Realism? Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Naim, M. (2009), ‘Minilateralism: The Magic Number to Get Real International Action’, Foreign Policy, 22 June, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2009/06/18/minilateralism.Google Scholar
Nippon (2013), ‘Japan Must Engage China, Freeze the Senkaku Debate: An Interview with Former Japanese Ambassador to China Niwa Uichirō’, Nippon.com, 29 October, http://www.nippon.com/en/people/e00050/.Google Scholar
Okawara, N., and Katzenstein, P. J. (2001), ‘Japan and Asia-Pacific Security: Regionalization, Entrenched Bilateralism, and Incipient Multilateralism’, The Pacific Review, 14 (2): 165–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patrick, S. (2009), ‘Prix Fixe and á la Carte: Avoiding False Multilateral Choices’, The Washington Quarterly, 32 (4).Google Scholar
Paul, T. V. (2005), ‘Soft Balancing in the Age of US Primacy’, International Security, 30 (1): 4671.Google Scholar
Pekkanen, S. M. (2005), ‘Bilateralism, Multilateralism, or Regionalism?: Japan's Trade Forum Choices’, Journal of East Asian Studies, 5 (1): 77103.Google Scholar
Pempel, T. J. (2010), ‘Soft Balancing, Hedging, and Institutional Darwinism: The Economic-Security Nexus and East Asian Regionalism’, Journal of East Asian Studies, 10 (2): 209‒38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regnier, P., and Warner, D., Eds. (2001), Japan and Multilateral Diplomacy, Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Rix, A. (1993), ‘Japan and the Region: Leading from Behind’, in Higgott, R., Leaver, R., and Ravenhill, J. (eds.), Pacific Economic Relations in the 1990s: Cooperation or Conflict? Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Samuels, R. J. (2007), Securing Japan: Tokyo's Grand Strategy and the Future of East Asia, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Satoh, Y. (2012), ‘Foreword’, in Lam, P. R. (ed.), Japan's Relations with Southeast Asia: The Fukuda Doctrine and Beyond, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shoji, T. (2013), ‘Japan's Perspective on Security Environment in the Asia Pacific and Its Approach toward Multilateral Cooperation: Contradictory or Consistent?’, Paper presented at the National Institute of Defense Studies (NIDS) International Symposium on Security, Tokyo, 12 November.Google Scholar
Sieff, M. (2013), ‘ASEAN Defense Ministers Host Disaster Relief, Military Medicine Exercise’, Asia Pacific Defense Forum, 28 June, http://apdforum.com/en_GB/article/rmiap/articles/online/features/2013/06/28/asean-disaster-relief.Google Scholar
Sieg, L. and Takenaka, K. (2013), ‘Japan to Bolster Military, Boost Asia Ties to Counter China’, Reuters, 17 December, http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/12/17/us-japan-security-idUSBRE9BG02S20131217.Google Scholar
Singh, B. (2013), Japan's Security Identity: From a Peace State to an International State, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, S. A. (2013), ‘Abe's Yasukuni Visit: The Consequences?’, Asia Unbound, 30 December, New York: Council for Foreign Relations, http://blogs.cfr.org/asia/2013/12/30/abes-yasukuni-visit-the-consequences/.Google Scholar
Soeya, Y. (2012), ‘China, and Japan's Foreign Policy Posture’, East Asia Forum, 8 April, http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2010/02/16/the-us-japan-alliance-beyond-futenma/.Google Scholar
Sudo, S. (1992), The Fukuda Doctrine and ASEAN: New Dimensions in Japanese Foreign Policy, Singapore: ISEAS.Google Scholar
Sukma, R. (2012), ‘Insight: East Asia Needs a Steering Committee’, The Jakarta Post, 4 September.Google Scholar
Snyder, G. H. (1997), Alliance Politics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Tabuchi, H. (2013), ‘With Shrine Visit, Leader Asserts Japan's Track from Pacifism’, The New York Times, 26 December.Google Scholar
Tan, S. S. (2009), ‘Introduction’, in Tan, S. S. (ed.), Regionalism in Asia, Vol. III: Regional Order and Architecture, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tan, S. S. (2012), ‘“Talking Their Walk”? The Evolution of Defense Regionalism in Southeast Asia’, Asian Security, 8 (3): 232‒50.Google Scholar
Tan, S. S. (2013a), ‘Herding Cats: The Role of Persuasion in Political Change and Continuity in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 13 (2): 233‒65.Google Scholar
Tan, S. S. (2013b), Facilitating China‒US Relations in the Age of Rebalancing: ASEAN's ‘Middle Power’ Diplomacy, EAI MPDI Working Paper 1, October, Seoul: East Asia Institute.Google Scholar
Tanaka, H. (2010), ‘The US‒Japan alliance: beyond Futenma’, East Asia Forum, 16 February.Google Scholar
Tang, S. M. (2007), ‘Japan's Grand Strategic Shift from Yoshida to Koizumi: Reflections on Japan's Strategic Focus in the 21st Century’, Akademika 70 (January).Google Scholar
Terada, T. (1998), ‘The Origins of Japan's APEC Policy: Foreign Minister Takeo Miki's Asia-Pacific Policy and Current Implications’, The Pacific Review, 11 (3): 337‒63.Google Scholar
Terada, T. (1999), The Genesis of APEC: Australian‒Japanese Political Initiatives, Pacific Economic Papers 298, December, Canberra: Australia‒Japan Research Centre, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Terada, T. (2001), ‘Directional Leadership in Institution-Building: Japan's Approaches to ASEAN in the Establishment of PECC and APEC’, The Pacific Review, 14 (2).Google Scholar
Terada, T. (2006), ‘The Birth and Growth of ASEAN+3’, in Fort, B. and Webber, D. (eds.), Regional Integration in East Asia and Europe: Convergence or Divergence? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Terada, T. (2011), ‘Security Partnership: Toward a Softer Triangle Alliance with the United States?’, in Ikenberry, G. J., Inoguchi, T., and Sato, Y. (eds.), The US‒Japan Security Alliance: Regional Multilateralism, Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
The Editorial Board (2013), ‘Risky Nationalism in Japan’, The New York Times, 26 December.Google Scholar
The White House (2014), ‘US‒Japan Joint Statement: The United States and Japan Shaping the Future of the Asia-Pacific and Beyond’, The White House: Office of the Press Secretary, 25 April.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. (2009), ‘Interview: Bob Hawke and Gareth Evans, APEC Architects’, CNN Global News View, 12 November.Google Scholar
Tiezzi, S. (2014), ‘China's Response to the US Cyber Espionage Charges’, The Diplomat, 21 May, http://thediplomat.com/2014/05/chinas-response-to-the-us-cyber-espionage-charges/.Google Scholar
Tisdall, S. (2013), ‘Shinzo Abe: Is Japan's PM a Dangerous Militarist or Modernizing Reformer?’, The Guardian, 16 December.Google Scholar
Tow, W. T. and Taylor, B. (2010), ‘What is Asian Security Architecture?’, Review of International Studies, 36 (1): 95‒116.Google Scholar
Wesley, M. (2007), ‘Jealous Suitors: Sino-Japanese Competitive Regionalism and the Future of East Asia’, in Heazle, M. and Knight, N. (eds.), China‒Japan Relations in the Twenty-First Century: Creating a Future Past? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
White, H. (2014), ‘Japanese Collective Self-Defense: Abe's Changes Won't Help’, The Lowy Interpreter, 4 July, http://www.lowyinterpreter.org/post/2014/07/04/Japan-collective-self-defence-abe.aspx.Google Scholar
Wright, T. (2009), ‘Toward Effective Multilateralism: Why Bigger May Not Be Better’, The Washington Quarterly, 32 (3): 163‒80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xia, L. (2007), ‘East Asian Multilateral Cooperation and the Prospects for China‒Japan Relations’, in Heazle, M. and Knight, N. (eds.), China‒Japan Relations in the Twenty-first Century: Creating a Future Past? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Yang, L. and Lim, C. K. (2010), ‘Hatoyama's East Asian Community and Sino-Japanese Relation’, East Asia Policy, 2 (1).Google Scholar
Yuzawa, T. (2007), Japan's Security Policy and the ASEAN Regional Forum: The Search for Multilateral Security in the Asia-Pacific, Abingdon, Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar