Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T13:00:09.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Dr P. Karsten to Dr E. Mancke

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2011

Peter Karsten
Peter Karsten
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Itinerario , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , March 2004 , pp. 123 - 125
Copyright
Copyright © Research Institute for History, Leiden University 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 I certainly include those fields, but I also treat ordinances and statutes passed by pre- and post-Responsible Government councils and legislatures, as well as the common-law judgments of all of the high courts of the lands of the British Diaspora in North America and the Antipodes as part of my ‘high’ legal culture, something she seems to have missed.

2 Swinfen, David, Imperial Control ofColonial Legislation, 1813-1865: British Policy Towards Colonial Legislative Powers (Oxford, 1970), 151–155, noted on page 518 of my book.Google Scholar

3 I concede that ‘generally’ may have been the wrong adverb there (even though I immediately qualified it by naming eight such colonies where landlords sought tenants rather than purchasers).