Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:53:36.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IL GOVERNO ELETTRONICO: VISIONI, PRIMI RISULTATI E UN'AGENDA DI RICERCA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2018

Mauro Calise  and
Rosanna De Rosa

Introduzione

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Sul governo elettronico (e-government per gli addetti ai lavori) pesa, dalle origini, un'ambivalenza — e ambiguità. Terminologica ma, al tempo stesso, politologica. Nella quasi totalità degli studi, sia di presentazione che di implementazione, l'e-government viene indicato come un processo di trasformazione tecnologica (più o meno radicale) di alcune prassi amministrative, con l'obiettivo principale (dichiarato) di rendere più trasparente, efficiente e interattiva l'erogazione di alcuni servizi e l'accesso a molte informazioni. In tale accezione, l'e-government si collocherebbe tra i processi di ammodernamento della macchina burocratica rientrando nell'affollata categoria dei tentativi di riforma della pubblica amministrazione. Coerentemente con tale impostazione, numerose definizioni sottolineano l'ambito strettamente implementativo e policy-oriented dei principali progetti di e-government, collegandoli — e condizionandoli — alle potenzialità tecnologiche offerte dallo sviluppo delle ICT e di Internet in particolare.

Summary

Summary

E-government is commonly defined as a process of technological transformation of administrative organization and routines, with its main aim consisting in a more efficient and interactive provision of -and access to - public services. Thanks to the pervasive and globalizing impact of the ICT revolution and the Internet, e-government has rapidly become a key policy platform for bureaucratic reform. Yet, the growth of governmental intervention through electronic reingi-neering of the administrative branch also raises critical questions of democratic accountability. This article presents a state of the art assessment of the development of e-government by a) reviewing its main ideological manifestos originating from governmental, international and corporate actors, b) evaluating two major cross-national surveys of e-government recent achievements worldwide, c) defining a research agenda focusing on the (new) opportunities and (old) shortcomings of the electronic fronteer.

Type
Ricerche
Information
Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , August 2003 , pp. 257 - 283
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 by Società editrice il Mulino, Bologna 

References

Riferimenti bibliografici

Abramson, J.B., Arterton, F.C e Orren, J.R. (1988), The Electronic Commonwealth. The Impact of New Technologies on Democratic Politics, New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Barber, B. (2001), Building Security and Trust: Privacy and Integrity in the Use of Information, III Global Forum on Reinventing Government, Napoli.Google Scholar
Braga, C. (2000), The Networking Revolution. Opportunities and Challenges for Developing Countries, Washington, D.C., The World Bank Group.Google Scholar
Burke, S. (1999), Some Cautionary Notes on the «Virtual State», in Kamarck, E.C. e Nye, J.S. Jr. (a cura di), Democracy.com, Governance in a Networked World, Hollis, Hollis Publishing, pp. 163–168.Google Scholar
Caldow, J. (1999), The Quest for Electronic Government: A Defining Vision, Institute for Electronic Government, IBM.Google Scholar
Cap Gemini Ernst & Young (2002), Web-based Survey on Electronic Public Services, Commissione Europea, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Castells, M. (2002), Galassia Internet, Milano, Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Commissione Europea (1997), Coesione e società dell'informazione, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Commissione Europea (2000a), e-Europe. An Information Society for All, Communication on a Commission Initiative for the Special European Council of Lisbon, 23 and 24 March 2000, Lisbona.Google Scholar
Commissione Europea (2000b), e-Europe 2002. Una società dell'informazione per tutti, Piano d'azione preparato dal Consiglio e dalla Commissione europea per il Consiglio europeo di Feira 19-20 giugno, Feira.Google Scholar
Commissione Europea (2002), e-Europe 2005 action plan, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Delors, J. (1993), White Paper on Growth, Competitiveness and Employment: the Challenges and Ways forward into the 21st Century, Commissione Europea, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Dente, B. (a cura di) (2002), Federalismo informatico e rinnovamento delle istituzioni: dieci tesi sull'e-government, Roma, Astrid.Google Scholar
De Rosa, R. (2000), Fare politica in Internet, Milano, Apogeo.Google Scholar
Digital Opportunity Task Force (2002), Report on the State of Implementation of the Genoa Plan of Action, Dot Force, 27 giugno 2002.Google Scholar
Donati, E. e Cubello, A. (1999), www.cambiamento.pa, Milano, Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H. et al. (2001), Policy Learning and Public Information Technology. Contractual and e-Government Change, San Francisco, American Political Science Association Meeting.Google Scholar
Fountain, J.A. (1999), The Virtual State: Toward a Theory of Federal Bureaucracy in 21st Century, in Kamarck, E.C. e Nye, J.S. Jr. (a cura di), Democracy.com, Governance in a Networked World, Hollis, Hollis Publishing, pp. 133–156.Google Scholar
Goddard, T.D. and Riback, C. (1998), You Won – Now What? How Americans Can Make Democracy Work from City Hall to the White House, Scribners.Google Scholar
Holmes, D. (2002), E-Gov. Strategie innovative per il governo e la pubblica amministrazione, Milano, Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
InfoRegio 2002, Structural Actions in Support of the Information Society, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Kettl, D. (1998), Reinventing Government. A Fifth-Year Report Card, Washington, D.C., Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Kettl, D. (2000), The Global Public Management Revolution, Washington, D.C., Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Lessig, L. (1999), Code and other Laws of Cyberspace, New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lessig, L. (2001), The Future of Ideas. The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World, New York, Random House.Google Scholar
Lyon, D. (1994), The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society, Cambridge, Polity Press.Google Scholar
Lyon, D. (2002), La società sorvegliata, Milano, Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Mechling, J. (1999), Information Age Governance: Just the Start of Something Big? In E.C. Kamarck e J.S. Nye Jr. (a cura di), Democracy.com, Governance in a Networked World, Hollis, Hollis Publishing, pp. 169–192.Google Scholar
Norris, P. (2001), Digital Divide? Civic Engagement, Information Poverty & the Internet in Democratic Societies, New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
NTIA (2000), Falling Through the Net: Defining the Digital Divide, Washington, D.C., US Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
NTIA (2002), A Nation on line. How Americans Are Expanding Their Use of the Internet, Washington, D.C, US Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
Oecd (2002), Regulatory Policies in OECD Countries: From Interventionism to Regulatory Governance, Parigi.Google Scholar
Osborne, D. e Gaebler, T. (1995), Dirigere e governare. Una proposta per reinventare la pubblica amministrazione, Milano, Garzanti.Google Scholar
Osnaghi, A. (2002), Intervento al Seminario Astrid «Federalismo informatico e rinnovamento delle istituzioni», per la presentazione delle 10 tesi sull'e-government, Roma, 9 dicembre.Google Scholar
Padovani, C. e Nesti, G. (2002), La dimensione regionale nelle politiche dell'Unione Europea per la Società dell'Informazione, Convegno annuale della Società Italiana di Scienza Politica, Genova, 19-20 settembre.Google Scholar
Pew Internet & American Life Project (2002), The Rise of the E-Citizen: How People Use Government Agencies’ Web Sites, Washington, D.C., Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
Polliti, C. e Bouckaert, G. (2002), La riforma del management pubblico, Milano, EGEA.Google Scholar
Regonini, G. (2002), E-government e bisogno di imprecisione, Convegno annuale Società Italiana di Scienza Politica, Genova, 19-20 settembre.Google Scholar
Rodotà, S. (1997), Tecnopolitica. La democrazia e le nuove tecnologie della comunicazione, Bari, Laterza.Google Scholar
Rur (2003), Città digitali in Italia 2003, Milano, Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Stanca, L. (2002), Per una visione condivisa dell'innovazione nello stato federale, 2° Riunione del Comitato strategico della Commissione permanente per l'innovazione e le tecnologie, Conferenza dei Presidenti delle Regioni, Roma, 28 novembre.Google Scholar
Tapscott, D. (2000), Governance in the Digital Economy. Online Government Blurring the Boundaries, Boston, Digital4sight.Google Scholar
UN-dpepa (2002), Benchmarking E-government: Assessing the United Nations Member States, New York.Google Scholar
Whitaker, R. (1999), The End of Privacy, New York, The New Press.Google Scholar
Williams, S. (2003), Codice Libero: la crociata di Richard Stallman per il software libero, Milano, Apogeo.Google Scholar
Winograd, M.A. (2001), ICT Impact on the Organisation of Government, III Global Forum on Reinventing Government, Napoli.Google Scholar
World Bank (2000a), The Network Revolution: Opportunities and Challenges for Developing Countries, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
World Bank (2000b), The e-Government Handbook for Developing Countries InfoDev paper, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar