Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-5dd2w Total loading time: 0.312 Render date: 2022-05-24T21:04:23.537Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

INDIVIDUALISMO METODOLOGICO E AUTORITÀ NELLE ORGANIZZAZIONI

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2016

Get access

Introduzione

Tra gli scienziati sociali che operano oggi in Italia l'espressione «teorie razionali della politica» può far pensare a Max Weber e alla sua concezione del carattere razionale del potere legale con apparato amministrativo burocratico.

Type
Saggi
Copyright
Copyright © Società Italiana di Scienza Politica 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, G. (1971), Essence of Decision , Little Brown, Boston.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. (1974), The Limits of Organization , Norton, New York e Londra; trad. it. I limiti dell'organizzazione, Il Saggiatore, Milano 1986.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R. (1970), Conflict of Interest , Markham, Chicago.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1789), An Introduction to the Principles of Moral and Legislation ; l'edizione Clarendon Press, Oxford 1907 è una ristampa di «A New Edition» rivista dall'autore e pubblicata nel 1823.Google Scholar
Black, D. (1958), The Theory of Committees and Elections , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Breton, A. e Wintrobe, R. (1982), The Logic of Bureaucratic Conduct , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; trad. it. La logica del comportamento burocratico, Il Mulino, Bologna 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brosio, G. (a cura di) (1989), La teoria economica dell'organizzazione , Il Mulino, Bologna.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. (1977), Freedom in Constitutional Contract , Texas A & M University Press, College Station; trad. it. Libertà nel contratto costituzionale, Il Saggiatore, Milano 1990.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. e Tullock, G. (1962), The Calculus of Consent , The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R. (1937), The Nature of the Firm , in «Economica», IV, pp. 386405; trad. it. in Brosio (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R. (1960), The Problem of Social Cost , in «Journal of Law and Economics», IV, pp. 144; trad. it. (parziale) in Forte e Granaglia (1980).Google Scholar
Cohen, M., March, J. e Olsen, J. (1972), A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice , in «Administrative Science Quarterly», 17, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cyert, R. e March, J. (1963), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. (1971), Polyarchy. Participation and Opposition , Yale University Press, New Haven; trad. it. Poliarchia, Franco Angeli, Milano 1981.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. (1982), Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy , Yale University Press, New Haven; trad. it. I dilemmi della poliarchia pluralista, Il Saggiatore, Milano 1988.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. e Lindblom, C. (1976), Politics, Economics and Welfare , The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Debreu, G. (1959), Theory of Value , Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1957), An Economic Theory of Democracy , Harper & Row, New York; trad. it. Teoria economica della democrazia, Il Mulino, Bologna 1988.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, F. (1981), Mathematical Psychics , Kegan Paul & Co.; trad. it. Psichica matematica, «Nuova collana di economisti stranieri e italiani», vol. IV, UTET, Torino 1937, pp. 193327.Google Scholar
Farquharson, R. (1969), Theory of Voting , Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Forte, F. e Granaglia, E. (1980) (a cura di), La nuova economia politica americana , SugarCo, Milano.Google Scholar
Gossen, H. (1854), Entwicklung der Gesetze des menschlichen Verkehrs und der daraus fliessenden Regeln für menschliches Handeln ; trad. it. Sviluppo delle leggi del commercio umano, CEDAM, Padova 1950.Google Scholar
Halperin, M. (1974), Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy , The Brooking Institution, Washington.Google Scholar
Jevons, S. (1871), Theory of Political Economy , Macmillan, London, trad. it. Teoria della economia politica, UTET, Torino 1947.Google Scholar
Kyburg, H. e Smockler, H. (1964) (a cura di), Studies in Subjective Probability , Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Luce, D. e Raiffa, H. (1957), Games and Decisions , Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
March, J. e Olsen, J. (1976), Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations , Universitetsforlaget, Bergen.Google Scholar
March, J. e Simon, H. (1958), Organizations , The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Martelli, P. (1983), La logica della scelta collettiva , Il Saggiatore, Milano.Google Scholar
Mckelvey, R. (1976), Intransitivities in Multidimensional Voting Models and Some Implications for Agenda Control , in «Journal of Economic Theory», XII, pp. 285–97.Google Scholar
Moe, T. (1984), The New Economic of Organization , in «American Journal of Political Science», XXVIII; trad. it. in Brosio (1989).Google Scholar
Olson, M. (1965), The Logic of Collective Action , Harvard University Press, Cambridge Ma.; trad. it. La logica dell'azione collettiva, Feltrinelli, Milano 1983.Google Scholar
Ordeshook, P. (1986), Game Theory and Political Theory , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panebianco, A. (1986), La dimensione internazionale dei processi politici , in Pasquino, G. (a cura di) (1986), Manuale di Scienza della politica , Il Mulino, Bologna.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. (1897), Cours d'économie politique , Rouge, Lausanne; trad. it. Corso di economia politica, Einaudi, Torino 1943.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. (1906), Manuale di economia politica , Società Editrice Libraria, Milano.Google Scholar
Plott, C. (1967), The Notion of Equilibrium and its Possibility under Majority Rule , in «American Economic Review», LVII, pp. 787806.Google Scholar
Riker, W. (1962), The Theory of Political Coalitions , Yale University Press, New Haven & Londra.Google Scholar
Riker, W. e Ordeshook, P. (1973), An introduction to Positive Political Theory , Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliff.Google Scholar
Rusconi, G. (a cura di) (1989), Giochi e paradossi in politica , Einaudi, Torino.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. (1954), The pure Theory of Public Expenditure , in «The Review of Economics and Statistics», XXXVI, pp. 387–9.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy , Harper and Row, New York; trad. it. Capitalismo, socialismo, democrazia, Etas Kompass, Milano 1955.Google Scholar
Scott, R. (1981), Organizations. Rational, Natural and Open Systems , Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliff; trad. it. Le organizzazioni, Il Mulino, Bologna 1985.Google Scholar
Simon, H. (1957), Administrative Behavior , New York, Macmillan, seconda edizione; trad. it. Il comportamento amministrativo, Il Mulino, Bologna 1967.Google Scholar
Simon, H. (1976), From Substantive to Procedural Rationality , in Metod and Appraisal in Economics , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; ristampato in Hahn, F. e Hollis, M. (a cura di), Philosophy and Economic Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1979.Google Scholar
Simon, H. (1983), Reason in Human Affairs , Stanford University Press, Stanford; trad. it. La ragione nelle vicende umane, Il Mulino, Bologna 1984.Google Scholar
Simon, H. (1985), Causalità, razionalità, organizzazione , Il Mulino, Bologna 1985.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. (1961), The Economics of Information in «Journal of Political Economy», LXIX, pp. 213–25.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. (1968), The organization of Industry , Inwin Inc., Homewood, Ill.Google Scholar
von Hayek, F.(1945), The Use of Knowledge in Society , in «American Economic Review», XXXV, pp. 519–30; trad. it. L'uso delle conoscenze nelle società, in von Hayek, F.A., Conoscenze, mercato, pianificazione, Il Mulino, Bologna 1988.Google Scholar
von Hayek, F.(1973), Rules and Order , Chicago University Press, Chicago; trad. it. in Legge, legislazione e libertà, Il Saggiatore, Milano 1986.Google Scholar
von Neumann, J. e Morgenstern, O. (1944), Theory of Games and Economic Behavior , Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1922), Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft , Mohr, Tubingen; trad. it. Economia e società, Edizioni di Comunità, Milano 1961.Google Scholar
Weingast, B. e Marshall, W. (1988), The Industrial Organization of Congress or Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are not Organized as Markets , in «Journal of Political Economy», XCVI pp. 132–63; trad. it. in Brosio (1989).Google Scholar
Wildavsky, A. (1964), The Politics of the Budgetary Process , Little Brown, Boston; trad. it. Bilancio e sistema politico, Franco Angeli, Milano 1978.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies , Free Press, New York.Google Scholar

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

INDIVIDUALISMO METODOLOGICO E AUTORITÀ NELLE ORGANIZZAZIONI
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

INDIVIDUALISMO METODOLOGICO E AUTORITÀ NELLE ORGANIZZAZIONI
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

INDIVIDUALISMO METODOLOGICO E AUTORITÀ NELLE ORGANIZZAZIONI
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *