Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T11:34:08.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Responding to mental health statutory drivers: experience of a low intensity cognitive behavioural therapy programme

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2015

R. Mills*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Psychology, The Queen’s University of Belfast, Northern Ireland
W. Mowlds
Affiliation:
Psychological Therapies Service, Whiteabbey Hospital, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland
K. F. W. Dyer
Affiliation:
Psychological Therapies Service, Holywell Hospital, Antrim, Northern Ireland
P. Corr
Affiliation:
Northern Health & Social Care Trust, Spruce House, Braid Valley Site, Ballymena, Northern Ireland
M. Kavanagh
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Psychology, The Queen’s University of Belfast, Northern Ireland
*
*Address for correspondence: M. Kavanagh, Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Psychology, The David Keir Building, 18-30 Malone Road, The Queen’s University of Belfast, BT9 5BP, Northern Ireland. (Email: rmills05@qub.ac.uk)

Abstract

Objectives

Stress control (SC), a brief psycho-education course, was implemented to increase access to psychological therapies in line with Northern Irish mental health service statutory drivers. The first aim of this study was to gauge the efficacy of SC in a robust manner with clinical significance testing. The second aim was to assess whether demographics traditionally ‘hard-to-reach’ – males, younger adults and those from deprived areas – accessed SC. The third aim was to elucidate what prompted their access and the experiences of attendees at SC.

Methods

Attendees at SC were 170 adults over six iterations of the course. Pre- and post-questionnaires included the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales – 21, captured demographic details and qualitative feedback, which was subject to a mixed-methods analysis.

Results

SC attendees reported significant decreases on depression, anxiety and stress sub-scales post-intervention. Moreover, 38.71% (n=36) of attendees who completed SC exhibited clinically significant improvement afterwards on one or more sub-scale. Attendance figures for males, younger adults and those classified as socioeconomically deprived were modest. Patterns within the data suggested prospective success for targeting these cohorts.

Conclusions

SC attracted people in need of mental healthcare input and affected quantifiable change within those people’s lives, while satisfying statutory demands for service delivery in an accessible community context. Recommendations to increase engagement with those traditionally ‘hard-to-reach’ for psychological services are provided, which, if implemented, have the potential to achieve further compliance with Northern Irish mental health statutory drivers.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
© College of Psychiatrists of Ireland 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antony, MM, Bieling, PJ, Cox, BJ, Enns, MW, Swinson, RP (1998). Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the depression anxiety stress scales in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychological Assessment 10, 176181.Google Scholar
Bamford Review of Mental Health and Learning Disability (2007). A Comprehensive Legal Framework for Mental Health and Learning Disability. Bamford Review of Mental Health and Learning Disability: Northern Ireland.Google Scholar
Bennett-Levy, J, Richards, DA, Farrand, P (2010). Low intensity CBT interventions: a revolution in mental health care. In Oxford Guide to Low Intensity CBT Interventions (ed. J. Bennett-Levy, D. Richards, P. Farrand, H. Christensen and K. Griffiths), pp. 318. Oxford University Press: New York, NY.Google Scholar
Creswell, JW (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety (2012). Protect Life. Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety: Northern Ireland.Google Scholar
Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety (2013). Transforming your Care: Vision to Action. Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety: Northern Ireland.Google Scholar
Griner, D, Smith, TB (2006). Culturally adapted mental health intervention: a meta-analytic review. Psychotherapy 43, 531548.Google Scholar
Gyani, A, Shafran, R, Layard, R, Clark, DM (2013). Enhancing recovery rates: lessons from year one of IAPT. Behaviour Research and Therapy 51, 597606.Google Scholar
Henry, JD, Crawford, JR (2005). The short‐form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS‐21): construct validity and normative data in a large non‐clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 44, 227239.Google Scholar
Hsieh, HF, Shannon, SE (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15, 12771288.Google Scholar
Jacobson, NS, Truax, P (1991). Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 59, 1219.Google Scholar
Kellett, S, Clarke, S, Matthews, L (2007). Delivering group psychoeducational CBT in primary care: comparing outcomes with individual CBT and individual psychodynamic‐interpersonal psychotherapy. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 46, 211222.Google Scholar
Lovibond, SH, Lovibond, PF (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales, II edn., Psychology Foundation: Sydney.Google Scholar
Maybin, E, Dyer, K (2011). A Baseline Service Evaluation of Individuals Attending a Trauma Service. Belfast Health & Social Care Trust Report: Northern Ireland.Google Scholar
Northern Ireland Statistics & Research Agency (2010). Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measure 2010. Northern Ireland Statistics & Research Agency: Northern Ireland.Google Scholar
Singleton, N, Bumpstead, R, O’Brien, M, Lee, A, Meltzer, H (2003). Psychiatric morbidity among adults living in private households, 2000. International Review of Psychiatry 15, 6573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Daele, T, Van Audenhove, C, Vansteenwegen, D, Hermans, D, Van Den Bergh, O (2013). Effectiveness of a six session stress reduction program for groups. Mental Health & Prevention 1, 1925.Google Scholar
White, J (1998). Stress control large group therapy for generalized anxiety disorder: two year follow-up. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 26, 237245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, J (2008). Stepping up primary care. Psychologist 21, 844847.Google Scholar
White, J (2010). Large group didactic CBT classes for common mental health problems. In Oxford Guide to Low Intensity CBT Interventions (ed. J. Bennett-Levy, D. Richards, P. Farrand, H. Christensen and K. Griffiths), pp. 313321. Oxford University Press: New York, NY.Google Scholar
Young, JE, Rygh, JL, Weinberger, AD, Beck, AT (2007). Cognitive therapy for depression. In Clinical Handbook of Psychological Disorders: A Step-by-Step Treatment Manual, 4th edn. (ed. D. H. Barlow), pp. 250305. Guilford Press: New York, NY.Google Scholar