Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T05:23:19.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

General practitioners' opinion of a new psychiatry of old age service

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Margaret Kelleher
Margaret Kelleher*
Affiliation:
Consultant in Psychiatry of Old Age, St Camillus' Hospital, Shelbourne Road, Limerick, Co Limerick, Ireland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the reaction of local general practitioners to a new psychiatry of old age service 10 months following its inception.

Method: An anonymous questionnaire was sent to all GPs in the catchment area of the Service. Questions asked the opinion of GPs on structure and process of the Service, and also asked for suggestions as to how the Service could patients did not have any reservations about being seen by a psychiatrist, but 72% of rural GPs felt the location of the service base (in the city) was a problem.

Conclusion: The results of the study suggest that GPs are reasonably satisfied with the initial service offered by the new specialty. Future service developments must address issues highlighted such as access to the service for patients living outside the city, improving the inpatient facilities for patients with a functional mental illness, and improving communication with GPs.

Keywords

Psychiatry of old ageGeneral practitionersCommunicationDomiciliary assessment
Type
Brief Reports
Information
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , September 1997 , pp. 102 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.The Years Ahead. A Policy for the Elderly. Dublin: Department of Health, 1988.Google Scholar
2. Who Cares. Mid-Western Health Board, February 1992.Google Scholar
3.Jolley, D, Arie, T. Developments in psychogeriatric services. In: Recent advances in psychogeriatrics Vol 2. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1992: 117–35.Google Scholar
4. Personal Communication.Google Scholar
5.Ashaye, O, Dhadphale, M, Okore, A. General practitioners' views of a psychogeriatric serivice. Psychiatr Bull 1996; 20: 135–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Collins, D, Clinch, , Liston, R. General practitioner views of a new specialist department of medicine for the elderly. IMJ 1995; 88(5): 162–4.Google ScholarPubMed
7.Gehlhaar, E. Service evaluation in old age psychiatry; using the general practitioner's view. Psychiatr Bull 1989; 13: 428–30.Google Scholar
8.Arie, T. The first year of the Goodmayes psychiatric service for old people. Lancet 1970; ii: 1179–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Shah, A. Home visits by psychiatrists. BMJ 1992; 304: 780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Hardy-Thompson, C, Orrell, M, Bergman, K. Evaluating a psychogeriatric domiciliary visit service: views of general practitioners. BMJ 1992; 304: 421–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Wilkinson, G. Referrals from general practitioners to psychiatrists and paramedical mental health professionals. Br J Psychiatry 1989; 154: 72–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.VP, Prasher, Fitzmaurice, D, Krishnan, V, Oyebode, F. Communication between general practitioners and psychiatrists. Psychiatr Bull 1992; 16: 468–9.Google Scholar
13.Banerjee, S, Lindesay, J, Murphy, E. Psychogeriatricians and general practitioners; a national survey. Psychiatr Bull 1993; 17: 592–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.AH, Mann. Future directions for the specialty of old age psychiatry; Some suggestions for debate. Int J Geriat Psychiatry 1995; 10: 87–91.Google Scholar
15.BA, Lawlor. Barriers to the diagnosis and treatment of depression in the community dwelling elderly. Ir J Psych Med 1995; 12(1): 22–3.Google Scholar