Hostname: page-component-758b78586c-pp4sz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-11-29T10:04:50.527Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Reducing the revolving door phenomenon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Antoinette Daly*
Mental Health Research Unit, Health Research Board, Knockmaun House, 42-47 Lower Mount Street, Dublin 2, Ireland
Donna Tedstone Doherty
Mental Health Research Unit, Health Research Board, Knockmaun House, 42-47 Lower Mount Street, Dublin 2, Ireland
Dermot Walsh
Mental Health Research Unit, Health Research Board, Knockmaun House, 42-47 Lower Mount Street, Dublin 2, Ireland
*Correspondence E-mail:


Objectives: De-institutionalisation and the expansion of community services have resulted in a reduction in the number of inpatient admissions in Ireland having fallen by 31% between 1986 and 2006. However, despite this, readmissions continue to account for over 70% of all admissions. The policy document A Vision for Change identified many shortcomings in the current model of provision of mental health services, making recommendations for the future development of community-based services with emphasis on outreach components such as homecare, crisis intervention and assertive outreach approaches. These recommendations are reviewed in relation to readmissions and the impact they may have on reducing the revolving door phenomenon.

Method: Three main intervention programmes essential to the delivery of an effective community-based service outlined and recommended by A Vision for Change, along with other pertinent factors, are discussed in relation to how they might reduce readmissions in Ireland. A series of Pearson correlations between Irish inpatient admissions rates and rates of outpatient attendances and provision of community mental health services are carried out and examined to explain possible relationships between increasing/decreasing admission rates and provision/attendances at community services. International literature is reviewed to determine the effectiveness of these intervention programmes in reducing admissions and readmissions and their relevance to the Irish situation is discussed.

Conclusions: Whilst A Vision for Change goes a long way towards advocating a more person-centred, recovery oriented and integrated model of service delivery, it is apparent from the consistently high proportion of readmissions in Ireland that there are still many shortcomings in service provision. The availability of specialised community-based programmes of care is as yet relatively uncommon in Ireland and uneven in geographical distribution. A considerable improvement in their provision, quantitatively and qualitatively, is required to impact on the revolving door phenomenon. In addition a re-configuration of existing catchment populations is required if they are to be successfully introduced and expanded.

Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


1.Department of Health. Report of the Inspector of Mental Hospitals. Dublin: Stationery Office, 1923.Google Scholar
2.O'Connor, A, Walsh, D. Activities of Irish Psychiatric hospitals and Units 1986. Dublin: Health Research Board, 1989.Google Scholar
3.Daly, A, Walsh, D, Moran, R. Activities of Irish Psychiatric Units and Hospitals 2006. Dublin: Health Research Board, 2007.Google Scholar
4.Department of Health. The Psychiatric Services – Planning for the Future. Dublin: Stationery Office, 1984.Google Scholar
5.Department of Health. Green Paper on Mental Health. Stationery Office, Dublin, 1992.Google Scholar
6.Department of Health. Commission of Inquiry on Mental Illness 1966 Report. Dublin: Stationery Office, 1966.Google Scholar
7.Department of Health and Children. A Vision for Change. Report of the Expert Group on Mental Health Policy. Dublin: Stationery Office, 2006.Google Scholar
8.May, AR. Mental health services in Europe. Geneva: WHO, 1976.Google Scholar
9.Kastrup, M. Who became revolving door patients? Acta Psychiatr Scand 1987; 76: 80–8.Google Scholar
10.Kastrup, M. The use of psychiatric register in predicting the outcome “revolving door patient”; a nationwide cohort of first time admitted psychiatric patients. Acta Psychiatrica Scand 1987; 76; 552560.Google Scholar
11.Lien, L. Are re-admission rates influenced by how psychiatric services are organized? Nord J Psychiatry 2002; 56: 23–8.Google Scholar
12.Daly, A, Tedstone, Doherty D, Walsh, D. Readmissions to psychiatric units and hospitals 2001-2005. Dublin: Health Research Board, 2007.Google Scholar
13.Mental Health Commission. Annual Report 2006. Mental Health commission including the Report of the Inspector of Mental Health Services 2006. Dublin: Mental Health Commission, 2007.Google Scholar
14.Department of Health. A National Service Framework for Mental Health: Modern Standards and Service Models. London: Department of Health, 1999.Google Scholar
15.Department of Health. Mental Health Policy Implementation Guide. Community Mental Health teams. London, 2001.Google Scholar
16.Department of Health. The National Service Framework for Mental Health – Five years On. London, 2004.Google Scholar
17.Gaddini, A, Biscaglia, L, Bracco, Ret al.A One-Day census of acute psychaitric inpatient facilities in italy: Findings from the PROGRES-Acute Project. Psych Services 2008; 59: 722724.Google Scholar
18.Commander, M, Disanyake, L. Impact of functionalised community mental health teams on inpatient care. Psychiatric Bull 2007; 30: 213–15.Google Scholar
19.Department of Health. The NHS Plan. A Plan for Investment. A Plan for Reform (Cm 4818-1). London: TSO (The Stationery Office), 2000.Google Scholar
20.Department of Health. Mental health ten years on: progress on mental health care reform. London, 2007.Google Scholar
21.Burns, T, Knapp, M, Catty, J, Healey, A, Henderson, J, Watt, H, Wright, C. Home treatment of mental heath problems: a systematic review. Health Technology Assessment 2001; 5(15) Scholar
22.Jethwa, K, Galappathie, N, Hewson, P. Effects of a crisis resolution and home treatment team on inpatient admissions. Psychiatric Bull 2007; 31:170–2.Google Scholar
23.Johnson, S, Nolan, F, Hoult, Jet al.Outcomes of crisis before and after introduction of a crisis resolution team. Br J Psychiat 2005; 187: 6875.Google Scholar
24.Johnson, S, Nolan, F, Pilling, Set al.Randomised controlled trial of acute mental health care by a crisis resolution team: the North Islington crisis study. BMJ 2005; 331: 599602.Google Scholar
25.Glover, G, Arts, G, Babu, KS. Crisis resolution/home treatment teams and psychiatric admission rates in England. Br J Psychiat 2006; 189: 441–5.Google Scholar
26.Gibbons, P, Cocoman, A. Building Blocks: Evaluation of a Home Based Service for Patients with Acute Mental Illness in North Kildare. Health Service Executive, 2006.Google Scholar
27.Smyth, MG, Hoult, J. The home treatment enigma. BMJ 2000; 320: 305–8.Google Scholar
28.Keogh, F. Family Burden and Mental Illness in Ireland. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Trinity College Dublin, 1997.Google Scholar
29.McCauley, M, Rooney, S, Clarke, C, Carey, T, Owens, J. Home-based treatment in Monaghan: the first two years. Ir J Psych Med 2003; 20(1): 11–4.Google Scholar
30.Stein, LI, Test, MA. Alternative to mental health treatment I: conceptual model, treatment program and clinical evaluation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1980; 37: 392–7.Google Scholar
31.Bond, GR, Witheridge, TF, Dincin, J, Wasmer, D, Webb, J, De, Graaf-Kaser R. Assertive community treatment for frequent users of psychiatric hospitals in a large city: a controlled study. Am J Comm Psychol 1990; 18(6): 865–91.Google Scholar
32.Bond, GR, McGrew, JH, Fekete, DM. Assertive outreach for frequent users of psychiatric hospitals: a meta-analysis. J Ment Health Adm 1995 Winter; 22(1): 416.Google Scholar
33.Nelson, G, Aubry, T, Lafrance, A. A review of the literature on the effectiveness of housing and support, assertive community treatment, and intensive case management nterventions for persons with mental illness who have been homeless. Am J Orthopsychiat 2007; 77(3): 350–61.Google Scholar
34.Thornicroft, G, Wykes, T, Holloway, F, Johnson, S, Szmukler, G. From efficacy to effectiveness in community mental health services. PRiSM Pschosis Study 10. Brit J Psychiat 1998; 173:423–7.Google Scholar
35.Burns, T, Creed, F, Fahy, T, Thompson, S, Tyrer, P, White, I. Intensive versus standard case management for severe psychotic illness: a randomised trial. Lancet 1999; 353: 2185–9.Google Scholar
36.McGorry, PD, Killackey, E, Yung, AR. Early intervention in psychotic disorders: detection and treatment of the first episode and the critical early stages. Med J Aust 2007 Oct 1; 187(7 Suppl): s810.Google Scholar
37.Marshall, M, Lewis, S, Lockwood, A, Drake, R, Jones, P, Croudace, T. Association between duration of untreated psychosis and outcome in cohorts of first-episode patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62: 975–83.Google Scholar
38.Clarke, M, Whitty, P, Browne, Set al.Untreated illness and outcome of psychosis. Brit J Psychiat 2006; 189; 235–40.Google Scholar
39.Melle, I, Larsen, TK, Haar, Uet al.Reducing the duration of untreated first-episode psychosis: effects on clinical presentation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004; 61 (2): 143–50.Google Scholar
40.McCorry, PD. Early intervention in psychotic disorders: beyond debate to solving problems. Brit J Psychiat 2005 Suppl Aug; 48: 108–10.Google Scholar
41.WHO. The optimal mix of services for mental health. Mental health Policy, Planning and Service Development Information Sheet, WHO, Geneva, 2007. Accessed 4 September 2007. Scholar
42.Keogh, F, Roche, A, Walsh, D. “We Have No Beds....An enquiry into the availability and use of Acute Psychiatric Beds in the Eastern Health Board region. Dublin: Health Research Board, 1999.Google Scholar
43.Hickey, T, Moran, R, Walsh, D. Psychiatric Day Care – An Underused Option? The purposes and functions of Psychiatric Day Hospitals and Day Centres: A Study in Two Health Boards. Dublin: Health Research Board, 2003.Google Scholar
44.Daly, A, Walsh, D. Activities of Irish Psychiatric Services 2004. Dublin: Health Research Board, 2005.Google Scholar
45.Mental Health Commission. Community Mental Health Services in Ireland. Activity and Catchment Area Characteristics 2004. Mental Health Commission, 2006.Google Scholar
46.Klinkenberg, WD, Calsyn, RJ. Predictors of receipt of aftercare and recidivism among persons with severe mental illness: a review. Psychiat Serv 1996; 47: 487–96.Google Scholar
47.Caton, CLM, Koh, SP, Fleiss, JL, Barrow, S, Goldstein, JM. Rehospitalization in chronic schizophrenia. J Nerv Mental Dis 1985; 173: 139–48.Google Scholar
48.Boydell, KM, Malcolmson, SA, Sikerbol, K. Early rehospitalisation. Can J Psychiat 1991;36:743–45.Google Scholar
49.Olfson, M, Walkup, J. Discharge planning in psychiatric units in general hospitals. New Directions for Mental Health Services 1997; 73, 7585.Google Scholar
50.Naji, SA, Howie, FL, Cameron, IMet al.Discharging psychiatric inpatients back to primary care: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of a novel discharge protocol. Primary Care Psychiat 1999; 5: 109–15.Google Scholar
51.Walker, SA, Eagles, JM. Discharging psychiatric patients from hospital. Psych Bull 2002;26:241–42.Google Scholar
52.Bridge, JA, Barbe, RP. Reducing hospital admission in depression and schizophrenia: Current evidence. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2004 Nov; 17(6): 505–11.Google Scholar
53.Cassidy, E, Hill, S, O'Callaghan, E. Efficacy of a psycho-educational intervention in improving relatives knowledge about schizophrenia and reducing rehospitalisation. Eur Psychiat 2001; 16(8): 446–50.Google Scholar
54.Ran, MS, Xiang, MZ, Chan, CLet al.Effectiveness of psycho-educational intervention for rural Chinese families experiencing schizophrenia – a randomised controlled trial. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatri Epidemiol 2003 Feb; 38(2): 6975.Google Scholar
55.Pitschel-Walz, G, Bäuml, J, Bender, W, Engel, RR, Wagner, M, Kissling, W. Psychoeducation and compliance in the treatment of schizophrenia: results of the Munich Psychosis Information Project Study. J Clin Psychiat 2006 Mar; 67(3): 443–52.Google Scholar
56.Bäuml, J, Pitschel-Walz, G, Volz, A, Engel, RR, Kissling, W. Psycho-education in schizophrenia: a 7-year follow-up concerning rehospitalisation and days in hospital in the Munich Information Project Study. J Clin Psychiat 2007 Jun; 68(6): 854–61.Google Scholar
57.Department of Health. Mental Health Act 2007. London: HMSO, 2006. (accessed 12 February 2008).Google Scholar
58.Burgess, M, Bindman, J, Leese, M, Henderson, C, Szmukler, G. Do community treatment orders for illness reduce readmission to hospital? An epidemiological study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatri Epidemiol 2006; 41 : 574–9.Google Scholar
59.Segal, SP, Burgess, PM. Conditional Release, a less restrictive alternative to hospitalisation? Psych Services 2006; 57: 1600–6.Google Scholar
60.Kisely, S, Campbell, LA. Does community or supervised community treatment reduce ‘revolving door’ care? Legislation is consistent with recent evidence. Br J Psychiat 2007; 191:373–4.Google Scholar
61.Lawton, Smith S, Dawson, J, Burns, T. Community Treatment Orders are not a good thing. Br J Psychiatry 2008; 193: 96100.Google Scholar
62.Walsh, D. (2008) Community treatment orders and readmissions. Submitted.Google Scholar
63.Tedstone, Doherty D, Moran, R, Kartalova-O'Doherty, Y, Walsh, D. HRB National Psychological Wellbeing and Distress Survey: Baseline Results. HRB Research Series 2. Dublin: Health Research Board, 2007.Google Scholar
64.Tedstone, Doherty D, Moran, R, Kartalova-O'Doherty, Y. Psychological distress, mental health problems and use of health services in Ireland. HRB Research Series 5. Dublin: Health Research Board, 2008.Google Scholar
65.Copty, M. Mental Health in Primary Care. ICGP, 2004.Google Scholar
66.World Health Organization. Monitoring and Evaluation of Mental Health Policies and Plans. Geneva: WHO, 2007.Google Scholar
67.Arboela-Florez, J. Stigmatisation and human rights violations: the state of the evidence. In: World Health Organisation (ed), Mental Health – a call for action by world health ministers. WHO 2001; 5771.Google Scholar
68.National Economic and social Forum (NESF) Mental Health and Social Inclusion Report 36. October 2007; National Economic and Social Development Office (NESDO), Dublin, 2007.Google Scholar