No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
THE ROYAL CEMETERY AT UR DURING THE SECOND HALF OF THE THIRD MILLENNIUM B.C.: POTTERY ANALYSIS THROUGH THE USE OF ARCHIVAL DATA, A CASE STUDY
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 September 2020
Abstract
The Royal Cemetery at Ur, with its almost two thousand graves, is one of the most impressive archaeological settings in southern Mesopotamia. Although most of the graves have been assigned to the Early Dynastic Period, more than three hundred graves have been dated to a timeframe from the Late Akkadian Period to the end of the third millennium B.C. However, the precise dating of many of these graves is under debate because stratigraphic data are often lacking, and the material culture used for dating has mainly been cylinder seals and other small finds. Due to the poor quality of the data published by Woolley, pottery has rarely been used to establish chronological determinants that could be useful in dating the graves. Thanks to the Ur Digitization Project, the field records from the Ur excavations are now available online. Among them are the Field Notes, which often contain pottery drawings, reproduced to scale. This paper re-analyses some of the graves in the Royal Cemetery at Ur that have been dated to the final part of the third millennium B.C. This analysis is based on a typological approach to the pottery assemblages that allows revised chronological determinants for dating selected grave contexts.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2020
References
Armstrong, J.A. and Gasche, H.. 2014. Mesopotamian Pottery: A Guide to the Babylonian Tradition in the Second Millennium BC. Belgium: University of Ghent; Chicago: Oriental Institute, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Arrivabeni, M. 2014. “Heart-Shaped ‘Akkadian’ Beakers and Bottles” in Lebeau, M., ed., ARCANE Interregional Vol. I, Ceramics. Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 237–243.Google Scholar
Ayoub, S.A.S. 1982. Die Keramik in Mesopotamien und in den Nachbargebieten: Von der Ur III Zeit bis zum Ende der kassitischen Periode. Mittenwald: Mäander.Google Scholar
Baadsgaard, A., Monge, J., Cox, S. and Zettler, R.L.. 2011. “Human sacrifice and intentional corpse preservation in the Royal Cemetery of Ur”. Antiquity 85: 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benati, G. 2015. “Re-modeling Political Economy in Early 3rd Millennium BC Mesopotamia: Patterns of Socio-Economic Organization in Archaic Ur (Tell al-Muqayyar, Iraq)”. Cuneiform Digital Library Journal 2015 (2): 1–37.Google Scholar
Benati, G., Leoni, E. and Mantellini, S.. 2016. “Georeferencing Woolley's ‘Royal Cemetery’ and Deep Soundings at Ur (Iraq)”. Ocnus 24: 9–22.Google Scholar
Boehmer, R.M. 1965. Die Entwicklung der Glyptik während der Akkad-Zeit. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehmer, R.M., Pedde, F., Salje, B., Kúcher, F., Maul, S. and Meinert, G.. 1995. Uruk: die Gräber. Mainz am Rhein: von Zabern.Google Scholar
Buchanan, B. 1954. “The Date of the So-Called Second Dynasty Graves of the Royal Cemetery at Ur”. Journal of the American Oriental Society 74 (3): 147–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casadei, E. 2016. “Southern Mesopotamian Contexts and a Reevaluation of the Ur III Pottery. Reconsidering a Chronological Periodization” in Stucky, R.A., Kaelin, O. and Mathys, H.-P., eds. Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East, 9–13 June 2014, Basel, Vol. 3. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, pp. 31–43.Google Scholar
Casadei, E. 2020. “The pottery repertoire at the end of the 3rd Millennium BC as chronological marker between Southern Mesopotamian and the neighbouring regions. The case-study of the Syrian Jazirah” in Coppini, C. and Simi, F. eds. Broadening Horizons 5, Civilizations in Contact: Interactions and New Directions in Near Eastern Archaeology. Trieste: West & East, pp. 41–76.Google Scholar
Casadei, E. and Volpi, L.. In press. “Ceramic Technology between the Third and Second Millennium BC. New Insights from Southern Mesopotamia” in M. Arntz and M. Lewis, eds. The Chaîne opératoire: Past, Present and Future. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 35 (1).Google Scholar
Cohen, A.C. 2005. Death rituals, ideology, and the development of early Mesopotamian kingship: Toward a new understanding of Iraq's royal cemetery of Ur. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Collon, D. 1982. Catalogue of the Western Asiatic seals in the British Museum. Cylinder seals Vol. 2, Akkadian-Post Akkadian-Ur III-periods. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Delougaz, P. 1952. Pottery from the Diyala Region. Chicago: Oriental Institute, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
De Meyer, L. ed. 1984. Tell Ed-Dēr IV: Progress reports (Second Series). Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Dickson, D.B. 2013. “Kingship as Racketeering: The Royal Tombs and Death Pits at Ur, Mesopotamia, Reinterpreted from the Standpoint of Conflict Theory” in Hill, J. A., Jones, P. and Morales, A. J., eds. Experiencing Power, Generating Authority: Cosmos Politics, and Ideology of Kingship in Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology.Google Scholar
Edwards, I.E.S., Gadd, C.J. and Hammond, N.G.L., eds. 1971. The Cambridge Ancient History: Early History of the Middle East (3rd ed., Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edzard, D.O. 1968/1969. “Die Inschriften der altakkadischen Rollsiegel”. Archiv für Orientforschung 22: 12–20.Google Scholar
Frankfort, H. 1955. Stratified cylinder seals from the Diyala region. Chicago: Oriental Institute, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Frankfort, H., Lloyd, S. and Jacobsen, T.. 1940. The Gimilsin Temple and the Palace of the Rulers at Tell Asmar. Chicago: Oriental Institute, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Gernez, G. 2007. L'armement en métal au Proche et Moyen-Orient: des origines à 1750 av. J.-C. Paris: Université Panthéon-Sorbonne. Sciences de l'Homme et Société. (Vols. I-II).Google Scholar
Gibson, M. 1982. “A Re-Evaluation of the Akkad Period in the Diyala Region on the Basis of Recent Excavations at Nippur and in the Hamrin”. American Journal of Archaeology 86 (4): 531–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafford, W.B. 2017. “City of the Moon”. Expedition 59 (1): 10–19. Accessed 20 Apr 2019 http://www.penn.museum/sites/expedition/?p=24158Google Scholar
Haneen, Q.R. 2003–2004. “Prospectings and Archaeological Investigation in Ur ‘2001’”. Sumer 52: 26–58 (in Arabic).Google Scholar
Hussein, S.Y., Altaweel, M. and Rejeb, Z.. 2009. “Report on Excavations at Tell al-Wilaya, Iraq Further Information on the 1999 and 2000 Seasons”. Akkadica 130 (1): 3–43.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, T. 1939. The Sumerian King List. Assyriological studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Karstens, K. 1987. Typologische Untersuchungen an Gefässen aus Altakkadischen Gräbern des Königsfriedhofes in Ur. Ein Betrag zur modernen archäologischen Methodik. München: Profil Verlag.Google Scholar
Mallowan, M.E.L. and Parker, B.. 1970. “Zur Datierung des Königsfriedhofes von Ur (Hans Jörg Nissen): A Review”. Iraq 32 (2): 214–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchesi, G. 2010. “The Sumerian King List and the Early History of Mesopotamia”. Quaderni Di Vicino Oriente V: 231–248.Google Scholar
Martin, H.P. 1982. “The Early Dynastic Cemetery at al-’Ubaid, a Re-Evaluation”. Iraq 44: 145–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, H.P., Moon, J. and Postgate, J.N.. 1985. Abu Salabikh Excavations Volume 2: Graves 1 to 99. London: British School of Archaeology in Iraq.Google Scholar
McCarthy, A.P. 2011. “Glyptic” in Lebeau, M., ed. Jezirah (ARCANE Series I). Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 277–290.Google Scholar
McCown, D.E. and Haines, R.C.. 1967. Nippur I. Temple of Enlil, Scribal Quarter and Soundings (OIP 78). Chicago: Oriental Institute, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
McMahon, A. 2006. Nippur V. The Early Dynastic to Akkadian Transition: The WF Sounding at Nippur. (OIP 129). Chicago: Oriental Institute, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
McMahon, A. 2014. “Carinated, Ridged-Shoulder ‘Akkadian’ Jars” in Lebeau, M., ed. Ceramics (ARCANE Interregional vol. I). Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 245–252.Google Scholar
Michalowski, P. 1983. “History as Charter, Some Observations on the Sumerian King List”. Journal of the American Oriental Society 103 (1): 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, J. 1987. Abu Salabikh Excavations Vol. 3: Catalogue of Early Dynastic Pottery. London: British School of Archaeology in Iraq.Google Scholar
Moorey, P.R.S. 1977. “What do we know about the people buried in the Royal Cemetery?” Expedition 20: 24–40.Google Scholar
Moorey, P.R.S. 1984. “Where Did They Bury the Kings of the IIIrd Dynasty of Ur?” Iraq 46 (1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nissen, H.J. 1966. Zur Datierung des Königsfriedhofes von Ur: unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Stratigraphie der Privatgräber. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt Verlag.Google Scholar
Pollock, S. 2007. “Death of a Household” in Laneri, N. ed. Performing Death (Oriental Institute Seminars 3). Chicago: Oriental Institute, University of Chicago, pp. 209–222.Google Scholar
Pruβ, A. 2007. “Comb-Incised Pottery in Syria and Mesopotamia and Its Relevance for Chronology” in Matthiae, P., Pinnock, F., Nigro, L. and Peyronel, L., eds. Proceedings of the International Colloquium: From Relative Chronology to Absolute Chronology, The Second Millennium BC in Syria-Palestine. Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei. Roma: Bardi editore, pp. 473–497.Google Scholar
Rakic, Y.Z. 2003. The contest scene in Akkadian glyptic: A study of its imagery and function within the Akkadian empire. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/dissertations/AAI3095932.Google Scholar
Reichel, C. 2018. “Centre and Periphery–The Role of the ‘Palace of the Rulers’ at Tell Asmar in the History of Ešnunna (2,100 –1,750 BCE)”. Journal of the Canadian Society for Mesopotamian Studies 11–12: 29–53.Google Scholar
Rohn, K. 2011. Beschriftete mesopotamische Siegel der Frühdynastischen und der Akkad-Zeit. Fribourg: Academic Press; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Sallaberger, W. and Schrakamp, I., eds. 2015. History and Philology (ARCANE Vol. III). Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Stone, E. and Zimansky, P.. 2016. “Archaeology Returns to Ur. A New Dialog with Old Houses”. Near Eastern Archaeology 79 (4): 246–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Ess, M. 1988a. “Keramik von der Akkad- bis zum Ende der Altbabylonischen Zeit aus den Planquadraten N XV und XVI und aus dem Sinkašid-Palast in Uruk-Warka”. Baghdader Mitteilungen 19: 321–442.Google Scholar
van Ess, M. 1988b. “Keramik von der Ur III- und Altbabylonischen Zeit aus dem Suchgraben im Planquadrat P XIII in Uruk-Warka”. Baghdader Mitteilungen 19: 443–463.Google Scholar
Woolley, L.C. 1934. Ur Excavations Vol. II: The Royal Cemetery. A report on the Predynastic and Sargonid graves excavated between 1926 and 1931. London: British Museum; Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Woolley, L.C. 1955. Ur Excavations Vol. IV: The Early Periods. London: British Museum; Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Woolley, L.C. 1974. Ur Excavations Vol. VI: The Buildings of the Third Dynasty. London: British Museum; Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Woolley, L.C. and Mallowan, M.E.L., 1976. Ur Excavations Vol. VII: The Old Babylonian Period. London: British Museum; Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Yaseen, G.T. 1995. Old Babylonian Pottery from the Hamrin: Tell Halawa. London: NABU Publications.Google Scholar
Zettler, R.L. 1991. “Nippur under the Third Dynasty of Ur: Area TB.” Aula Orientalis IX: 251–281.Google Scholar
Zettler, R.L. and Hafford, W.B.. 2015. “Ur. B. Archäologisch.”. Reallexicon der Assyriologie 14: 367–385.Google Scholar
Zettler, R.L. and Horne, L., eds. 1998. Treasures from the Royal Tombs of Ur. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, P.C. 1998. A Critical Reexamination of the Early Dynastic “Royal Tomb” Architecture from Ur. M.A. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar