Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T19:21:24.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MESAG REPORTS A MURDER: CUNEIFORM TABLETS IN THE COLLECTIONS OF NORWICH CASTLE MUSEUM AND CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2015

E. Robson  and
G. Zólyomi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present editions of five cuneiform tablets in the collection of Norwich Castle Museum and two held by Cambridge University Library. The Norwich tablets comprise three tablets from the well-known “Mesag archive” or “Umma C” from the Sargonic period; one small tablet from Ur III Umma; and a fragment of an unprovenanced Old Babylonian account. Those in Cambridge are both from Ur III Girsu: a wool receipt and part of a balanced labour account.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 76 , December 2014 , pp. 189 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AAICAB = Grégoire, Jean-Pierre (1996). Archives administratives et inscriptions cunéiformes: Ashmolean Museum, Bodleian Collection, Oxford. Paris: Librairie Orientaliste Paul Geuthner.Google Scholar
AAS = Grégoire, Jean-Pierre (1970). Archives administratives sumériennes. Paris: Librairie Orientaliste Paul Geuthner.Google Scholar
BPOA 1 = Ozaki, Tohru and Sigrist, Marcel (2006). Ur III Administrative Tablets from the British Museum, vol. 1 (Biblioteca del Proximo Oriente Antiguo, 1). Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.Google Scholar
BPOA 6 = Sigrist, Marcel and Ozaki, Tohru (2009). Neo-Sumerian Administrative Tablets from the Yale Babylonian Collection, vol. 6 (Biblioteca del Proximo Oriente Antiguo, 6). Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Google Scholar
CHEU = Contenau, Georges (1915). Contribution à l'histoire économique d'Umma (Bibliothèque de l'école des Hautes Études, sciences philologiques et historiques, 119). Paris: É. Champion.Google Scholar
DCS = Charpin, Dominique and Durand, Jean-Marie (1981). Documents cunéiformes de Strasbourg, conservés à la Bibliothèque nationale et universitaire (Recherche sur les grandes civilisations, 4). Paris: Éditions A.D.P.F.Google Scholar
HLC = Barton 1905–14 .Google Scholar
MC 4 = Steinkeller 1991.Google Scholar
Metal = Limet, Henri (1976). Le travail du metal au pays de Sumer au temps de la IIIe dynastie d'Ur (Bibliothèque de la Faculté de philosophie et lettres de l'Université de Liège). Brussels: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Nik = Nikol'skij, Mikhail Vasil'evič (1908–15). Dokumenty khozjajstvennoj otcetnosti drevnejsej epokci Khaldei iz sobranija N.P. Likhaceva (Drevnosti Vostocnyja, 3/2 & 5). St Petersburg: A. Vil'borg.Google Scholar
USP = Foster 1982.Google Scholar
UTI 3 = Yildiz, Fatma and Gomi, Tohru (1993). Die Umma-Texte aus den Archäologischen Museen zu Istanbul, Band III (Nr. 1601–2300). Bethesda, MD: CDL Press.Google Scholar
UTI 5 = Yildiz, Fatma and Gomi, Tohru (2000). Die Umma-Texte aus den Archäologischen Museen zu Istanbul, Band V (Nr. 3001–3500). Bethesda, MD: CDL Press.Google Scholar
UTI 6 = Yildiz, Fatma and Gomi, Tohru (2001). Die Umma-Texte aus den Archäologischen Museen zu Istanbul, Band VI (Nr. 3501–3834). Bethesda, MD: CDL Press.Google Scholar
Barton, George A. (1905–14). Haverford Library Collection of Cuneiform Tablets or Documents from the Temple Archives of Telloh, 3 volumes. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bridges, Susan Jane (1981). ‘The Mesag archive: A study of Sargonic society and economy’ . Unpublished PhD dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
Catagnoti, Amalia (2003). ‘Two Sargonic tablets mentioning Mesag, énsi of Umma’, in Marrassini, Paolo et al. , eds., Semitic and Assyriological Studies. Presented to Pelio Fronzaroli by Pupils and Colleagues. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, pp. 105–15.Google Scholar
Cripps, Eric L. (2010). Sargonic and Presargonic Texts in The World Museum Liverpool (BAR International Series, 2135). Oxford: Archaeopress.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damerow, Peter (2012). ‘Sumerian beer: the origins of brewing technology in ancient Mesopotamia’, Cuneiform Digital Library Journal 2012:002, http://cdli.ucla.edu/pubs/cdlj/2012/cdlj2012_002.html Google Scholar
Foster, Benjamin R. (1980). ‘Notes on Sargonic royal progress’, Journal of the Ancient Near Eastern Society 12: 29–42.Google Scholar
Foster, Benjamin R. (1982). Umma in the Sargonic Period (Memoirs of the Connecticut Academy of Arts & Sciences, 20). Hamden, CT: Archon Books.Google Scholar
Foster, Benjamin R. (1993a). ‘Management and administration in the Sargonic period’, in Liverani, Mario, ed., Akkad: The First World Empire. Structure, Ideology, Traditions (History of the Ancient Near East. Studies, 5). Padova: Sargon srl, pp. 25–39.Google Scholar
Foster, Benjamin R. (1993b). ‘[Review of Steinkeller 1992]’, Orientalia 62: 442–46.Google Scholar
Jagersma, Abraham Hendrik (2010). ‘A descriptive grammar of Sumerian’ . Unpublished PhD dissertation, Universiteit Leiden.Google Scholar
Kienast, Burkhart and Volk, Konrad (1995). Die sumerischen und akkadischen Briefe des III. Jahrtausends aus der Zeit vor der III. Dynastie von Ur (Freiburger Altorientalische Studien, 19). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Martin, Emma (2010). ‘A feminine touch: Elaine Tankard and the creation of the Tibet collection at National Museums Liverpool’, Journal of Museum Ethnography 23: 98–114.Google Scholar
Michalowski, Piotr (1993). Letters from Early Mesopotamia (Writings from the Ancient World, 3). Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Mosley, Charles, ed. (1999). Burke's Peerage and Baronetage, 106th edition, 2 volumes. Crans, Switzerland: Burke's Peerage (Genealogical Books) Ltd.Google Scholar
Salgues, Emmanuelle (2011). ‘Naram-Sin's conquests of Subartu and Armanum’, in Barjamovic, Gojko et al. , eds., Akkade is King. A Collection of Papers by Friends and Colleagues Presented to Aage Westenholz on the Occasion of his 70th Birthday, 15th of May 2009 (Publications de l'Institut historique-archéologique néerlandais de Stamboul, 118). Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten, pp. 253–72.Google Scholar
Sallaberger, Walther (1996). ‘Zur frühen mesopotamischen Briefliteratur’, Orientalistische Literaturzeitung 91: 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sallaberger, Walther (2012). ‘Bierbrauen in Versen: Eine neue Edition und Interpretation der Ninkasi-Hymne’, in Mittermayer, Catherine and Ecklin, Sabine, eds., Altorientalische Studien zu Ehren von Pascal Attinger: mu-ni u4 ul-li2-a-aš ĝa2-ĝa2-de3 (Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis, 256). Fribourg: Academic Press and and Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, pp. 291–328.Google Scholar
Schrakamp, Ingo (2012). ‘Zu den vor-Ur III-Zeitlichen Keilschrifttexten des World Museum, Liverpool’, Journal of Cuneiform Studies 64: 145–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinkeller, Piotr (1991). Third-Millennium Legal and Administrative Texts in the Iraq Museum, Baghdad (Mesopotamian Civilizations, 4). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Steinkeller, Piotr (2013). ‘Corvée labor in Ur III times’, in Garfinkle, Stephen and Molina, Manuel, eds., From the 21st Century BC to the 21st Century AD. Proceedings of the International Conference on Sumerian Studies Held in Madrid, 22–24 July 2010. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, pp. 347–424.Google Scholar
Visicato, Giuseppe (2000). The Power of Writing. The Early Scribes of Mesopotamia. Bethesda, MD: CDL Press.Google Scholar