Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T06:21:26.045Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Herbicide Evaluation to Control Clematis terniflora Invading Natural Areas in Gainesville, Florida

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Kenneth Langeland*
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department and Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. 7922 NW 71st Street, Gainesville, FL 32653
Michael Meisenburg
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department and Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. 7922 NW 71st Street, Gainesville, FL 32653
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: gator8@ufl.edu

Abstract

Japanese clematis, a herbaceous to woody vine native to Asia, has been widely used for landscaping in the southeastern United States and is now a naturalized and invasive in Florida. Herbicides that contain the active ingredients fluroxypyr, glyphosate, imazapic, metsulfuron, or triclopyr, applied alone or in combination on a spray-to-wet basis, were evaluated for their effectiveness to control the plant in a natural area of Gainesville, FL. All herbicide treatments provided some level of control 30, 60, and 90 d after application. The most effective herbicide treatments, imazapic 0.6 g ae/L, glyphosate as low as 3.6 g ae/L, triclopyr as low as 3.6 g ae/L, metsulfuron 0.07 g ai/L, and fluroxypyr as low as 1.8 g ae/L, resulted in 72% to 99% control 90 d after application, but were not significantly different from each other. Natural area managers throughout the range of Japanese clematis should be vigilant for this species and remove it whenever encountered. Our results indicate that it can be controlled by foliar application of several herbicides commonly used for management of pest plants in natural areas, but repeat applications will be necessary.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Broschat, T. K. and Meerow, A. W. 1991. Betrock's Reference Guide to Florida Landscape Plants. Cooper City, FL Betrock Information Systems, Inc. 426.Google Scholar
Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council 2005. Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council's 2007 List of Invasive Plant Species. http://www.fleppc.org. Accessed: October 17, 2007.Google Scholar
Moreno, N. P. and Essig, F. 1997. 6a. Clematis Linnaeus subg. Clematis. Pages 159164 in Flora of North America North of Mexico. Vol. 3. New York Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, G. 1996. The Woody Shrubs and Woody Vines of Florida. Sarasota, FL Pineapple Press. 391.Google Scholar
Pringle, J. S. 1997. 6. Clematis Linnaeus. Pages 156176 in Flora of North America North of Mexico. Vol. 3. New York Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
SAS 2003. SAS for Windows. Release 9.1. Cary, NC SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Spingarn, J. E. 1935. Two notes on clematis: I. Clematis for the rock garden. II. The clematis lovers' debt to Japan. Bull. Garden Club of America September:6365.Google Scholar
Wunderlin, R. P. and Hansen, B. F. 2003. Guide to the Vascular Plants of Florida. 2nd ed. Gainesville, FL United Press of Florida. 787.Google Scholar