Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-846f6c7c4f-544bb Total loading time: 0.216 Render date: 2022-07-07T15:21:23.396Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Politics as Realitätsprinzip in the debate on constitutions and fragmented orders: remarks ‘On constitutions and fragmented orders’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2020

Xymena Kurowska*
Affiliation:
Central European University, Vienna, Austria
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: KurowskaX@ceu.edu

Abstract

The promise of constitutionalisation is, according to Kratochwil, the existential comfort that comes from having a coherent framework for judgement and action. This apparent epistemological confidence comes at the price of parting with a realistic assessment of the concrete situation, and it conceals that politics operate across all levels all the time. This paper critiques this vision and points beyond the idea of exhaustive frameworks. Figuring out contextually appropriate configurations of constitutionalisation and fragmentation allows for greater agency and pluralism. A more fundamental tension in Kratochwil's work remains, however, his falling back on the abstract to articulate the experiential.

Type
Symposium: In the Midst of Theory and Practice: Edited by Hannes Peltonen and Knut Traisbach
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernstein, Richard. 1983. Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Julius. 1963. “The Value of Value Symbols in Law.” In Essays on Jurisprudence from the Columbia Law Review, edited by William O. Douglas, 332–39. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1928. The Future of an Illusion. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1991. On Metapsychology, the Theory of Psychoanalysis: Beyond the Pleasure Principle, The Ego and the Id and Other Works. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan. 2004. “Constitutionalism Lite.” International Organizations Law Review 1 (1): 3158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2006. “On Legitimacy.” International Relations 20 (3): 302–08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2008. “Constructivism: What It Is (Not) and How It Matters.” In Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective, edited by della Porta, Donatella and Keating, Michael, 8098. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2014. The Status of Law in World Society: Meditations on the Role and Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2016. “Of Words and Deeds: A Reply to My Critics.” Millennium 44 (2): 278–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacan, Jacque. 2007. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: The Other Side of Psychoanalysis, Book XVII. New York and London: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Lynch, Cecelia. 2014. Interpreting International Politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Murray, Colin, and O'Donaghue, Aoife. 2017. “A Path Already Travelled in Domestic Orders? From Fragmentation to Constitutionalisation in the Global Legal Order.” International Journal of Law in Context 13 (3): 225–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1989. The View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 1992. Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas. 1995. “Levels.” European Journal of International Relations 1 (1): 3558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas. 2021. “Bewitching the World: Remarks on ‘Inter-disciplinarity, the Epistemological Ideal of Incontrovertible Foundations, and the Problem of Praxis’.” International Theory 13 (3): 522–9.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. 1989. The World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian. 2005. The Flight from Reality in the Human Sciences. Harvard: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Traisbach, Knut. 2021. “On Concepts, Conceptions, and Conceptors: Remarks ‘On the Concept of Law’.” International Theory 13 (3): 530–7.Google Scholar
Wiener, Antje. 2008. The Invisible Constitution of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wisdom, John. 1945. “Gods.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 45 (1): 185206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1958. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
5
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Politics as Realitätsprinzip in the debate on constitutions and fragmented orders: remarks ‘On constitutions and fragmented orders’
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Politics as Realitätsprinzip in the debate on constitutions and fragmented orders: remarks ‘On constitutions and fragmented orders’
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Politics as Realitätsprinzip in the debate on constitutions and fragmented orders: remarks ‘On constitutions and fragmented orders’
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *