Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T04:51:28.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Locating (new) materialist characters and processes in global governance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2020

Anna Leander*
Affiliation:
Department of International Relations and Political Science, The Graduate Institute, Geneva, Switzerland
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: anna.leander@graduateinstitute.ch

Abstract

This contribution probes A Theory of Global Governance from a materialist perspective. I focus on three forms of materialisms that have played a significant role in social theory as well as International Relations theory: the materialisms of markets, of artefacts, and of embodied affects. Integrating these materialisms serves to unsettle the conceptualization of global governance and of the politics of authority, legitimacy, and contestation underpinning it. A materialist perspective moves the theory of global governance towards a focus on processes instead of institutions, allowing it to capture both the multiple forms of global governance and their increasingly rapidly shifting forms. The contribution is anchored in a discussion of the global governance of cyber-security.

Type
Symposium: Authority, Legitimacy, and Contestation in Global Governance: Edited by Orfeo Fioretos and Jonas Tallberg
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amicelle, Anthony, Aradau, Claudia, and Jeandesboz, Julien. 2015. “Questioning Security Devices: Performativity, Resistance, Politics.Security Dialogue 46 (4): 293306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ananny, Mike, and Crawford, Kate. 2018. “Seeing without Knowing: Limitations of the Transparency Ideal and its Application to Algorithmic Accountability.” New Media & Society 20 (3): 973–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. 1988. “Introduction: Commodities and the Politics of Value.” In The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, edited by Appadurai, Arjun, 363. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aradau, Claudia, and Blanke, Tobias. 2018. “Governing Others: Anomaly and the Algorithmic Subject of Security.” European Journal of International Security 3 (1): 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, Jacqueline, and Walters, William. 2013. “‘Actor-Network Theory’ and International Relationality: Lost (and Found) in Translation: Introduction.” International Political Sociology 7 (3): 332–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2015. Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, Michel. 2008. “Economic Markets and the Rise of Interactive Agencements: From Prosthetic Agencies to Habilitated Agencies.” In Living in a Material World: Economic Sociology Meets Science and Technology Studies, edited by Pinch, Trevor and Swedberg, Richard, 2956. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chun, Wendy. 2008. “On ‘Sourcery’, or Code as Fetish.” Configurations 16 (3): 299324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chun, Wendy. 2016. Updating to Remain the Same: Habitual New Media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, William E. 2013. The Fragility of Things: Self-Organizing Processes, Neoliberal Fantasies, and Democratic Activism. Durham, NC, : Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Kevin E., Kingsbury, Benedict and Merry, Sally Engle 2012. “Indicators as a Technology of Global Governance.Law & Society Review 46 (1): 71104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deitelhoff, Nicole, and Daase, Christopher. 2020. “Rule and Resistance in Global Governance.” International Theory 13 (1): 122–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1992. “What is a Dispositif?” In Michel Foucault: Philosopher, edited by Deleuze, Gilles, 159–68. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
DeNardis, Laura. 2009. Protocol Politics: The Globalization of Internet Governance. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeNardis, Laura. 2012. “Hidden Levers of Internet Control: An Infrastructure-Based Theory of Internet Governance.” Information, Communication & Society 15 (5): 720–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeNardis, Laura, and Musiani, Francesca. 2016. “Governance by Infrastructure.” In The Turn to Infrastructure in Internet Governance, edited by Musiani, Francesca, Cogburn, Derrick L., DeNardis, Laura and Levinson, Nanette S., 324. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Easterling, Keller. 2014. Extrastatecraft: The Power of Infrastructure Space. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Edwards, Paul N., Bowker, Geoffrey C., Jackson, Steven J, and Williams, Robin. 2009. “Introduction: An Agenda for Infrastructure Studies.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10 (5): 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 1990. Bananas, Beaches, and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fotopoulou, Aristea, and O'Riordan, Kate. 2017. “Training to Self-Care: Fitness Tracking, Biopedagogy and the Healthy Consumer.” Health Sociology Review 26 (1): 5468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garsten, Christina, and Sörbom, Adrienne. 2018. Discreet Power: How the World Economic Forum Shapes Market Agendas. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, Tarleton. 2014. “The Relevance of Algorithms.” In Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, edited by Gillespie, Tarleton, Boczkowski, Pablo J., and Foot, Kirsten A., 167–94. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Tarleton. 2018. Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano (2017) “Power and Cause.Journal of International Relations and Development 20 (4): 737–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Mark B. N. 2015. Feed Forward: On the Future of Twenty First Century Media. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1991. “A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century.” In Simians, Cybords and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, edited by Haraway, Donna, 183202. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna Jeanne. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, Graham. 2015. “Object-Oriented Ontology.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Posthumanism in Film and Television, edited by Hauskeller, Michael, Carbonell, Curtis D. and Philbeck, Thomas D., 401–09. London: Palgrave McMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayles, Kathrine. 2005. My Mother Was a Computer: Digital Subjects and Literary Text. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohmann, Stephanie (2019) “The Lives of Objects. In International Law's Objects, edited by Hohmann, S. and Joyce., D. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Richard. 1992. Pierre Bourdieu. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, Fleur. 2016. “Global Governance through the Pairing of List and AlgorithmEnvironment and Planning D: Society and Space 34 (1): 126–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, Fleur. 2017. “Data, Detection, and the Redistribution of the Sensible in International Law.” American Journal of International Law 111 (1): 57103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 2020. “The Global Politics Paradigm: Guide to the Future or Only the Recent Past?International Theory 13 (1): 112–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaminski, Liz (2018) “Calling a Truce to the Crypto Wars: Why Congress and Tech Companies Must Work Together to Introduce New Solutions and Legislation to Regulate Encryption.Seton Hall Law Review 48 (2): 507–33.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Re-assembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, and Weibel, Peter, eds. 2005. Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Law, John. 2015. “What's Wrong with a One-World World?Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 16 (1): 126–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Dantec, Christopher A., and DiSalvo, Carl. 2013. “Infrastructuring and the Formation of Publics in Participatory Design.” Social Studies of Science 43 (2): 241–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leander, Anna. 2019. “Sticky Politics: Composing Security by Advertising Tracking Devices.” European Journal of International Security 4 (3): 322–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leander, Anna. 2020. “The Politics of Neo-Liberal Rituals: Performing the Institutionalization of Liminality at Trade Fairs.” In The Oxford Handbook of Politics and Performance, edited by Rai, Sirin, Gluhovic, M., Jestrovic, S. and Saward, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, in press.Google Scholar
Lessig, Lawrence. 2009. “Code: And Other Laws of Cyberspace.” ReadHowYouWant.com.Google Scholar
Lupton, Deborah. 2016. “Digital Companion Species and Eating Data: Implications for Theorising Digital Data–Human Assemblages.” Big Data & Society 3 (1): 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M'charek, Amade, Schramm, Katharina, and Skinner, David. 2014. “Topologies of Race: Doing Territory, Population and Identity in Europe.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 39 (4): 468–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, Donald. 2019. “How Algorithms Interact: Goffman's ‘Interaction Order’ in Automated Trading.” Theory, Culture & Society 36 (2): 3959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Ruth. 2015. Snarl: In Defense of Stalled Traffic and Faulty Networks. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha. 2003. “Public and Private Partnerships: Accounting for the New Religion.” Harvard Law Review 116 (March): 1229–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mol, Anne-Marie. 2002. The Body Multiple. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, Lisa. 2013. Cybertypes: Race, Ethnicity, and Identity on the Internet. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peters, John Durham, 2015. The Marvelous Clouds: Toward a Philosophy of Elemental Media. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pignarre, Philippe, and Stengers, Isabelle. 2011. Capitalist Sorcery: Breaking the Spell. Houndmills, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pipek, Volkmar, and Wulf, Volker. 2009. “Infrastructuring: Toward an Integrated Perspective on the Design and Use of Information Technology.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10 (5): 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantin, Jean-Christophe, Lagoze, Carl, Edwards, Paul N., and Sandvig, Christian. 2018. “Infrastructure Studies Meet Platform Studies in the Age of Google and Facebook.” New Media & Society 20 (1): 293310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. 1957. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Paperback.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent. 2020. “Global Governance in the Age of Epistemic Authority.” International Theory 13 (1): 144–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, Mark B., ed. 2016. Making Things International, vols 1 and 2. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Shah, Nishant (2013) “Citizen Action in the Time of the Network.Development and Change 44 (3): 665681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, Nishant. 2015a. “Identity and Identification: The Individual in the Time of Networked Governance.” Socio-Legal Review 11 (2): 2240.Google Scholar
Shah, Nishant. 2015b. “Sluts ‘r'us: Intersections of Gender, Protocol and Agency in the Digital Age.” First Monday 20 (4).Google Scholar
Srnicek, Nick, Fotou, Maria, and Arghand, Edmund. 2013. “Introduction: Materialism and World Politics.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 41 (3): 397–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Star, Susan Leigh. 1999. “The Ethnography of Infrastructure.” American Behavioral Scientist 43 (3): 377–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Star, Susan Leigh, and Strauss, Anselm. 1999. “Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8 (1–2): 930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Star, Susan Leigh and Geoffrey C., Bowker (2002) “How to Infrastructure.” In Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Social Consequences of ICTs, edited by Livingstone, L. A. and Lievrouw, S., 151162. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starosielski, Nicole (2015) The Undersea Network. Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterne, Jonathan. 2003. “Bourdieu, Technique and Technology.” Cultural Studies 17 (3/4): 367–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoler, Ann Laura. 2010. Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power: Race and the Intimate in Colonial Rule. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 2018. “Infrastructures in and of Ethnography.” Anuac 7 (2): 4969.Google Scholar
Thrift, Nigel. 2008. Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trownsell, Tamara, Querejazu Escobari, Amaya, Shani, Giorgio, Chadha Behera, Navnita, Reddekop, Jarrad, and Tickner, Arlene B.. 2019. “Recrafting International Relations through Relationality.” E-International Relations. https://www.e-ir.info/2019/01/08/recrafting-international-relations-through-relationality/.Google Scholar
Walters, William (2002) “The Power of Inscription: Beyond Social Construction and Deconstruction in European Integration Studies.Millennium: Journal of International Studies 31 (1): 83108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziewitz, Malte. 2016. “Governing Algorithms: Myth, Mess, and Methods.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 41 (1): 316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 2018. A Theory of Global Governance: Authority, Legitimacy, and Contestation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar