Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T13:57:30.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ICRC's position on “humanitarian intervention”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2010

Anne Ryniker
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

• International humanitarian law cannot serve as a basis for armed intervention in response to grave violations of its provisions; the use of force is governed by the United Nations Charter.

• It is not for the ICRC to pronounce on the legality or legitimacy of such intervention.

• International humanitarian law applies when intervention forces are engaged in hostilities with one or more of the parties to the conflict.

• The ICRC seeks to promote the term “armed intervention in response to grave violations of human rights and of international humanitarian law”.

Type
Croix-Rouge et Croissant-Rouge/Red Cross and Red Crescent
Information
International Review of the Red Cross , Volume 83 , Issue 842 , June 2001 , pp. 527 - 532
Copyright
Copyright © International Committee of the Red Cross 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Abiew, Francis Kofi, The Evolution of the Doctrine and Practice of Humanitarian Intervention, Kluwer Law International, 1999, p. 31.Google Scholar

2 Humanitarian Intervention, Legal and Political Aspects, Danish Institute of International Affairs, 1999, p. 11.Google Scholar

3 Case concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Merits, Judgment, I.C.). Reports 1986, para. 243.

4 Ibid., para 268.