Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T17:00:55.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can public communication protect victims?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2005

Roland Huguenin-Benjamin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The phenomenon of 24-hour global coverage of world events has arguably made it more difficult for journalists to remain true to the deontology of their profession. At the same time, humanitarians are at pains to defend the concept of neutral independent action in armed conflicts that have global reverberations. Moral dilemma is often the order of the day for those who have to report on increasingly complex emergencies in war zones or to attempt to alleviate the suffering of victims. With examples from recent conflicts, this article asks whether there are ways in which journalists and humanitarians can contribute to saving lives.

Type
Communication
Information
International Review of the Red Cross , Volume 87 , Issue 860: Communication , December 2005 , pp. 661 - 672
Copyright
Copyright © International Committee of the Red Cross 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Quoted by Alan Rusbridger in the first edition of the new Berlin format Guardian, 9 September 2005.

2 Weingarten, Marc, Who is Afraid of Tom Wolfe? How New Journalism Rewrote the World, Aurum Press, 2005Google Scholar.

3 John Kleinwith, Time magazine, 26 September 2005.

4 Abdul-Ahad, Ghaith, “How can you establish a free media in such fear and anarchy?” The Guardian, 26 September 2005Google Scholar.

5 The Guardian, 26 August 2005

6 Mattin, David, “We are changing the nature of news”, Media Guardian, 15 August 2005Google Scholar.

7 Mary Kaldor, Professor, “The idea of global civil society”, Martin Wight Memorial Lecture, University of Essex, 31 October 2002Google Scholar.

8 Dowd, Maureen, “Smoke gets in our news”, New York Times, 20 April 2005Google Scholar.

9 “This media tribe disfigures public life”, address by the Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, at Lambeth Palace, 15 June 2005.

10 “This is not about name-calling, it is about scrutiny”, commented Alan Rusbridger in the Media Guardian, 14 March 2005.

11 Seymour Hersh, “Scoop”, Times Literary Supplement, 9 October 2004.

12 Wells, Matt, “Have I got news for you”, Media Guardian, 12 September 2005Google Scholar.

13 BBC Producers' Guidelines, p. 7.

14 Thompson, Mark, Forging War: The Media in Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Article 19, The Bath Press, Avon, 1994Google Scholar.

15 Hedges, Chris, “On war”, New York Review of Books, 16 December 2004Google Scholar.

16 Dart Centre for Journalism & Trauma, website visited on 2 September 2005.

17 Hansell, Saul, “Yahoo hires journalist to report on wars”, New York Times, 12 September 2005Google Scholar.

18 Gutman, Roy W., “Spotlight on violations of international humanitarian law”, International Review of the Red Cross, No. 325, December 1998, p. 619CrossRefGoogle Scholar.