Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T18:38:46.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Transition to Democracy in Victorian England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

“The organization and the establishment of democracy in Christendom”, de Tocqueville wrote in 1835, “is the great political problem of the time.” Nowhere was the problem more urgent than in England, whose industrial towns were soon to be torn by intense class conflict. Yet England resolved the tensions of the 1830's and 1840's, and went on to build a tough and supple political democracy in a massively undemocratic society.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis 1961

References

page 226 note 1 Tocqueville, Alexis de, Democracy in America, edited with an introduction by Commager, Henry Steele (New York 1947), p. 216.Google Scholar

page 226 note 2 Walling, R. A. J., ed., The Diaries of John Bright (New York 1931), p. 297.Google Scholar

page 229 note 1 Cole, G. D. H. and Filson, A. W., British Working Class Movements: Select Documents 1789–1875 (London 1951), p. 381.Google Scholar

page 230 note 1 Guardian, Manchester, 09 3, 1866. Cited hereafter as M.G.Google Scholar

page 230 note 2 Ibid., January 7, 1859.

page 230 note 3 Ibid., May 8, 1850.

page 230 note 4 Maccoby, S., English Radicalism 1853–1886 (London 1958), p. 82Google Scholar, quoting The National Review, April 1863. For a satiric description of the middle-class conception of its philanthropic role see the excerpt from Porcupine in Simey, Margaret B., Charitable Effort in Liverpool in the Nineteenth Century (Liverpool 1951), p. 56.Google Scholar

page 231 note 1 M.G., 10 14, 1858.Google Scholar

page 231 note 2 Ludlow, J. M. and Jones, Lloyd, Progress of the Working Class 1832–1867 (London 1867), p. 294.Google Scholar

page 231 note 3 M.G., 01 7, 1859Google Scholar. Samuel Smiles, sensitive to every nuance of mid-Victorian culture, also called for a greater sympathy between classes: “Thus only can the breath of society be sweetened and purified.” Briggs, Asa, Victorian People (London 1954), pp. 142–3.Google Scholar

page 232 note 1 See Simon, D., Master and Servant, in: Saville, J. ed., Democracy and the Labour Movement (London 1954).Google Scholar

page 232 note 2 See Hedges, R. Y. and Winterbottom, A., Legal History of Trade Unionism (London 1930), Chapter 5.Google Scholar

page 232 note 3 Young, G. M. and Handcock, W. D. eds., English Historical Documents 1833–1874, p, 390Google Scholar, quoting the Census Report of 1851–53 on Religious Worship.

page 232 note 4 M.G., 01 7, 1859.Google Scholar

page 232 note 5 See Hobsbawm, E. J., The Labour Aristocracy in 19th Century Britain, in: Saville, ed., Democracy and the Labour Movement.Google Scholar

page 233 note 1 See Altick, Richard D., The English Common Reader (Chicago 1957)Google Scholar; Simon, B., Studies in the History of Education, 1780–1870 (London 1960)Google Scholar; Smith, F., A History of English Elementary Education, 1760–1902 (London 1931)Google Scholar; Mathews, H. F., Methodism and the Education of the People, 1791–1851 (London 1949)Google Scholar; Maltby, S. E., Manchester and the Movement for National Elementary Education, 1800–1870 (Manchester 1918)Google Scholar; Tylecote, M., The Mechanics' Institutes of Lancashire and Yorkshire before 1851 (Manchester 1957)Google Scholar; Arnold, M., Reports on Elementary Schools, 1852–1882 (London 1910)Google Scholar; for excellent descriptions of the educational situation in two different industrial areas, see Education Commission, Reports of the Assistant Commissioners Appointed to Inquire into the State of Popular Education in England, 1861 (London 1861), II, 175242Google Scholar, on Rochdale, and Bradford, , and 245301Google Scholar, on the Potteries and the Black Country.

page 233 note 2 Jones, E. R., The Life and Speeches of Joseph Cowen, M.P. (London n.d.), p. 96.Google Scholar

page 233 note 3 M.G., 03 24, 1866.Google Scholar

page 233 note 4 Ibid., January 15, 1859.

page 233 note 5 Ibid., January 1, 1859.

page 233 note 6 Ibid., May 1, 1850. For an account of the mutual improvement societies and working-men's clubs see Ludlow, and Jones, , op. cit., pp. 174–80.Google Scholar

page 234 note 1 See Baernreither, J. M., English Associations of Working Men (London 1891)Google Scholar; Ludlow, and Jones, , op. cit., ch. 2Google Scholar; Cole, G. D. H., A Short History of the British Working Class Movement (London 1948), pp. 152–68.Google Scholar

page 234 note 2 M.G., 09 3, 1866.Google Scholar

page 234 note 3 Ludlow, and Jones, , op. cit., pp. 291–2.Google Scholar

page 234 note 4 Jones, , Cowen, Joseph, pp. 96–7.Google Scholar

page 235 note 1 See , S. and Webb, B., The History of Trade Unionism (London 1920), pp. 180232Google Scholar; Cole, G. D. H., A Short History of the British Working Class Movement (London 1948), pp. 169–85Google Scholar; Briggs, Asa, Victorian People (London 1954)Google Scholar, ch. 7, The Age of Improvement (London, 1959), pp. 408410Google Scholar; Cole, G. D. H. has described the wide variation within the mid-Victorian trade union movement in Some Notes on British Trade Unionism in the Third Quarter of the Nineteenth Century, in: International Review for Social History, II, 1937.Google Scholar

page 235 note 2 M.G., 09 7, 1866.Google Scholar

page 235 note 3 Briggs, , Victorian People, p. 178.Google Scholar

page 236 note 1 See Wickham, E. R., Church and People in an Industrial City (London 1957)Google Scholar. Chapter 4 not only describes the religious situation in Sheffield between 1850 and 1900, but also notes the presence of similar patterns in other cities. See also Inglis, K. S., Churches and Working Classes in Nineteenth Century England, in: Historical Studies: Australia and New Zealand, VIII, No. 29, 1957.Google Scholar

page 236 note 2 M.G., 01 5, 1859.Google Scholar

page 236 note 3 Ibid., April 27, 1850.

page 237 note 1 Wickham, , Church and People, p. 159Google Scholar. For examples of the relationship between the working classes and religious institutions in Liverpool, Bradford, and Manchester see the evidence presented to the Select Committee of the House of Lords on Deficiency of Means of Spiritual Instruction, Parliamentary Papers, 1857–58, IX, pp. 382f., 416f., 448f.Google Scholar

page 237 note 2 M.G., 05 1, 1850.Google Scholar

page 237 note 3 Wickham, , p. 141.Google Scholar

page 237 note 4 Young, and Handcock, , op. cit., p. 315.Google Scholar

page 238 note 1 M.G., 05 3, 1848Google Scholar; London Times, 05 1, 1848.Google Scholar

page 239 note 1 M.G., 05 3, 6, 17, 1848Google Scholar; London Times, 06 1, 8, 21, 1848Google Scholar; Illustrated London News, 06 10, 24, 1848.Google Scholar

page 239 note 2 London Times, 06 8, 1848.Google Scholar

page 239 note 3 Journal of the House of Commons, 1847–8, pp. 636–8.Google Scholar

page 239 note 4 See Gillespie, Frances E., Labor and Politics in England (Durham 1927)Google Scholar; Maccoby, S., English Radicalism, 1832–1852 (London 1935)Google Scholar, and English Radicalism, 1853–1886 (London 1938).Google Scholar

page 239 note 5 Gillespie, , pp. 85110Google Scholar; Maccoby, , English Radicalism 1832–1852, pp. 314315Google Scholar; Illustrated London News, 01 12, 1850.Google Scholar

page 239 note 6 M.G., 12 6, 1851.Google Scholar

page 239 note 7 Illustrated London News, 03 6, 1852Google Scholar; M.G., 03 6, 1852.Google Scholar

page 240 note 1 M.G., 01 1, 1859.Google Scholar

page 240 note 2 See M.G., 01 1859, passimGoogle Scholar; Gillespie, , pp. 178ff.Google Scholar, describes Radical activity in the Midlands and the North.

page 240 note 3 M.G., 02 2, 1859Google Scholar; Gillespie, , p. 154.Google Scholar

page 240 note 4 Gillespie, , pp. 238–86Google Scholar; Maccoby, , Radicalism 1853–1886, pp. 8499Google Scholar; Cole, and Filson, , pp. 529–32Google Scholar; M.G., 04 20, 1864, 05 16, 17, 1865, 11 20, 1866, 02 20, 1867.Google Scholar

page 240 note 5 Reid, T. W., Life of the Right Honourable William Edward Forster (London 1888), I, p. 367.Google Scholar

page 240 note 6 Saturday Review, 08 4, 1866.Google Scholar

page 241 note 1 Rogers, J. E. T., ed., Speeches on Questions of Public Policy by John Bright, M.P. (London 1869), II, pp. 100101.Google Scholar

page 241 note 2 M.G., 12 6, 1851.Google Scholar

page 242 note 1 Ibid., February 2, 1859.

page 242 note 2 Saville, John, Ernest Jones: Chartist (London 1952), pp. 6276.Google Scholar

page 242 note 3 M.G., 01 12, 1859.Google Scholar

page 242 note 4 Guttsman, W. L., The 1859 Election in Seven Yorkshire Cities, in: International Review of Social History, II (1957), Pt. 2.Google Scholar

page 242 note 5 Ibid., p. 253.

page 243 note 1 Cole, and Filson, , p. 529.Google Scholar

page 243 note 2 M.G., 04 1, 1864.Google Scholar

page 243 note 3 Ibid., September 24, 1866.

page 244 note 1 Ibid., September 25, 1866.

page 244 note 2 Reid, , Life of Forster, I, pp. 392–6.Google Scholar

page 244 note 3 On Tyneside a group of middle-class Radicals, led by Joseph Cowen, refused to stop short of manhood suffrage. In Birmingham the household suffrage position won a more complete triumph among both the middle and working classes, whereas another Midland town, Leicester, approximated the Lancashire and Yorkshire pattern, in that a substantial segment of the middle class held aloof from the Radicals. Such diversity, while of considerable importance, should not be permitted to obscure the unity of middle-class Radicalism in the industrial towns. See Jones, E. R., The Life and Speeches of Joseph Cowen, M.P.Google Scholar; McKinley, R. A. ed., A History of the County of Leicester, IV, (London 1958). pp. 216–24Google Scholar; and my article, The Origins of the Birmingham Caucus, in: Historical Journal, II, No. 2 (1959).Google Scholar

page 245 note 1 Reid, , Life of Forster, I, p. 399.Google Scholar

page 245 note 2 M.G., 11 20, 1866.Google Scholar

page 246 note 1 Cole, and Filson, , p. 535.Google Scholar

page 247 note 1 Hanham, H. J., Elections and Party Management: Politics in the Time of Disraeli and Gladstone (London 1959), pp. 6890.Google Scholar

page 247 note 2 Ibid., p. 81.

page 248 note 1 Harrison, Royden, The British Working Class and the General Election of 1868, in: International Review of Social History, vol. V (1960), part 3, and vol. VI (1961), part 1Google Scholar. Harrison has shown the importance of Liberal money in inducing Howell to enter into these Lib-Lab arrangements, which did not spring spontaneously from the Liberal inclinations of the working-class leadership. On the other hand, the deal with Howell would not have worked had not the vast majority of the artisan class been very favorably disposed to the Liberal party.

page 248 note 2 Cole, G. D. H., British Working Class Politics 1832–1914 (London 1941), pp. 5276Google Scholar; Hanham, , chapters 7 and 15Google Scholar; Pelling, H., The Origins of the Labour Party 1880–1900 (London 1954), pp. 38.Google Scholar

page 248 note 3 Pelling, , p. 218.Google Scholar

page 248 note 4 Ibid., pp. 235–8.