Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T07:29:01.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The French Left-Wing Radicals

Their Views on Trade Unionism, 1870–18981

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Leo A. Loubère
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

During the first three decades of the Third Republic there appeared a group of left-wing republicans who became known as Radical-Socialists. As a group they had many ideas in common and tended to vote on many issues with a rather high degree of unity. However, a careful study of their voting record allows three divisions to be made among them. On the extreme Left were the hard core Radical-Socialists (HCRS). They are so designated because their voting record attained a total of about 90% on bills and orders of the day of an advanced social nature. Somewhat less consistent were the Radical-Socialists (RS) who attained at least 75%. Among the former were deputies whose stand for reform was about as consistent as that of the average Socialist. Some of the most famous were Georges Clemenceau, Camille Pelletan, Georges Perin, Tony Révillon, Désiré Barodet, Henri and Félix Mathé, Armand Duportal, Félix Cantagrel, Camille Raspati, Sigismond Lacroix, Ernest Lefèvre, Martin Nadaud, Stéphan Pichon, Emile Chautemps and Marius Chavanne. Among the Radical-Socialists were Antoine Achard, Jules Baulard, Henri Maret, Germain Casse, René Goblet, Paul Doumer, Edouard Lockroy, Gustave Mesureur, Louis-Bernard Montaut, Michel Salis, Emile Brousse, Jules Lasbaysses, Roque de Fillol, Gustave Hubbard, and Benjamin Raspati. Another group, somewhat peripheral to the present study but included in order to round it out, were the social Radicals(SR), or Radicaux de Gauche, as they called themselves after 1881. Their voting record averaged about 60%. The term “left-wing Radicals” includes all the above categories. The moderate or orthodox Radicals were really advanced liberals as regards social legislation, and do not form part of the groups examined in this essay.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Review of Social History , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , August 1962 , pp. 203 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis 1962

References

page 205 note 1 Goguei, FrançoisLa politique des partis sous la Troisième République (Paris, 1946), p. 67.Google ScholarChastenet, J., Histoire de la Troisième République (Paris, 1954), II, 23–24.Google Scholar

page 206 note 1 Oct. 7, 1876, p. 1, col. 2.

page 206 note 2 Le, Radical, Nov. 4, 1881, p. 1, col. 4.Google Scholar

page 206 note 3 Journal officiel. Débats parlementaires. Chambre des Députés. March 31, 1882, p. 469. Henceforth cited as J. O. The dates refer to the sessions.

page 207 note 1 République française, March 9, 1872, p. 3, cols. 1–2; April 4, 1872, p. 2, col. 1; April 7, 1872, pp. 2–3.

page 208 note 1 Martin, Nadaud, Sociétés ouvrières (Paris, 1873), pp. 104–10.Google Scholar

page 208 note 2 La Justice, May 22, 1880, p. 1, cols. 5–6.

page 208 note 3 Le, Rappel, July 4, 1871, p. 3Google Scholar, cols. 1–2; July 18, 1872, p. 3, col. 5; Nov. 13, 1872, p. 3, cols. 4–5; see also his brochure Associations et chambres syndicales ouvrières (Paris, 1873), pp. 34–35, 81ff.

page 209 note 1 Le, Rappel, Jan. 16, 1875, p. 3Google Scholar, col. 4; Jan. 19, 1875, p. 3, col. 3.

page 209 note 2 La, Justice, May 22, 1880, p. 1Google Scholar, col. 3; Sept. 15, 1880, p. 1, cols. 5–6.

page 209 note 3 ibid., Oct. 12, 1880, p. 1, cols. 3–4.

page 210 note 1 J.O., June 12, 1883, p. 1283. See also La, Justice, Feb. 4, 1880, p. 1Google Scholar, cols. 3–4.

page 210 note 2 J.O., June 19. 1883, pp. 1352–56, 1359–60. See also Le, Radical, Feb. 19, 1893, p. 1Google Scholar, col. 4.

page 211 note 1 Le, Radical, Dec. 15, 1871, p. 1Google Scholar, cols. 3–4.

page 211 note 2 See this speech in Le, Rappel, July 19, 1876, p. 1Google Scholar, col. 6. This paper strongly supported Lockroy, as did the shortlived organ of Louis, Blanc, Homme Libre, Nov. 14, 1876, p. 1Google Scholar, col. 1.

page 212 note 1 Jean, Montreuil, Histoire du mouvement ouvrier en France (Paris, 1946), p. 131.Google ScholarEmile, Levasseur, Questions ouvrières et industrielles en France (Paris, 1907), p. 476.Google Scholar

page 213 note 1 J.O., May 17, 1881, pp. 910–12.

page 213 note 2 ibid., p. 917.

page 214 note 1 ibid.

page 214 note 2 ibid., pp. 918–19.

page 214 note 3 ibid., pp. 921–24.

page 215 note 1 March 23, 1882, p. 1, cols. 5–6.

page 216 note 1 J.O., June 16, 1883, p. 1315.

page 216 note 2 ibid., June 18, 1883, pp. 1334–35.

page 217 note 1 ibid., Jan. 30, 1884, p. 254.

page 217 note 2 ibid., March 13, 1884, p. 742.

page 217 note 3 ibid., pp. 738–39.

page 218 note 1 Montreuil, , p. 134.Google Scholar

page 218 note 2 Nov. 14, 1871, p. 2, cols. 5–6.

page 218 note 3 March 2, 1872, p. 1, col. 1. See March 7, p. 1, cols. 1–4.

page 218 note 4 March 19, 1872, p. 1, col. 1. Not to be confused with Clemenceau's paper founded in 1880.

page 219 note 1 Dec. 12, 1881, p. 1, cols. 5–6.

page 219 note 2 La, Justice, July 11, 1882, p. 1Google Scholar, col. 1. The Radicals were hardly in favor of freedom for religious associations, at least as long as the state supported the church.

page 219 note 3 J.O., Jan. 31, 1884, p. 257.

page 220 note 1 ibid., May 2, 1893, p. 1328.

page 221 note 1 Feb. 23, 1893, p. 1, cols. 2–3.

page 221 note 2 La, Justice, July 7, 1893, p. 1Google Scholar, cols. 1–2.

page 221 note 3 J.O., Feb. 10, 1894, pp. 187–88, 191.

page 222 note 1 Le, Radical, Dec. 11, 1895, p. 1Google Scholar, cols. 1–2.

page 222 note 2 Sept. 29, 1880, p. 1, cols. 5–6.

page 223 note 1 La, Justice, March 11, 1882, p. 1Google Scholar, col. 3.

page 225 note 1 Nov. 11, 1885, p. 2, cols. 2–3.

page 226 note 1 J.O., June 19, 1885, p. 1137.

page 227 note 1 ibid., March 19, 1892, pp. 307–17; p. 317 for quotation.

page 228 note 1 Nov. 13, 1893, p. 1, col. 1.

page 228 note 2 Sept. 29, 1893. p. 1, col. 6.

page 228 note 3 La, Justice, Nov. 13, 1893, p. 1Google Scholar, col. 1. See also Le, Rappel, Oct. 8, 1895, p. 1Google Scholar, cols. 1–2.

page 228 note 4 J.O., Feb. 23, 1895, p. 546.

page 228 note 5 ibid., Nov. 21. 1895, pp. 2442–44; Feb. 4, 1896, p. 167.

page 229 note 1 ibid., June 1, 1891, pp. 1074–76.

page 229 note 2 ibid., Nov. 3, 1892, pp. 1402–7.

page 229 note 3 ibid., June 14, 1894, pp. 1012–13, 1023.

page 229 note 4 ibid., p. 1017.

page 230 note 1 ibid., June 18, 1894, pp. 1053–55.

page 230 note 2 See, for example, Le, Rappel, Oct. 8, 1895, p. 1Google Scholar, cols. 1–2.