Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T11:41:00.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Implementation should now be considered in parallel with designing clinical research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 December 2020

Gill Livingston*
Affiliation:
Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK Services for Ageing and Mental Health, Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
Penny Rapaport
Affiliation:
Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK Services for Ageing and Mental Health, Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentary
Copyright
© International Psychogeriatric Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bray, J. et al. (2019a). Costing resource use of the Namaste Care Intervention UK: a novel framework for costing dementia care interventions in care homes. International Psychogeriatrics, 32, 14291438. doi: 10.1017/S1041610218002314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bray, J., Brooker, D. J. and Garabedian, C. (2019b). What is the evidence for the activities of Namaste Care? A rapid assessment review. Dementia (London), 1471301219878299. doi: 10.1177/1471301219878299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, J. et al. (2019c). Practice of Namaste Care for people living with dementia in the UK. Nursing Older People, 31, 2228.10.7748/nop.2018.e1109CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chambers, D. A., Glasgow, R. E. and Stange, K. C. (2013). The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change. Implementation Science, 8, 117.10.1186/1748-5908-8-117CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Froggatt, K., Patel, S., Perez Algorta, G. et al. (2018). Namaste Care in nursing care homes for people with advanced dementia: protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 8, e026531.10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026531CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwok, E. Y. L., Moodie, S. T. F., Cunningham, B. J. and Oram Cardy, J. E. (2020). Selecting and tailoring implementation interventions: a concept mapping approach. BMC Health Services Research, 20, 385.10.1186/s12913-020-05270-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Livingston, G., Pitfield, C., Morris, J., Manela, M., Lewis-Holmes, E. and Jacobs, H. (2012). Care at the end of life for people with dementia living in a care home: a qualitative study of staff experience and attitudes. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 27, 643650.10.1002/gps.2772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingston, G. et al. (2017). Dementia prevention, intervention, and care. Lancet, 390, 26732734.10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31363-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nilsen, P. (2015). Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implementation Science, 10, 53.10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sampson, E. L., Burns, A. and Richards, M. (2011). Improving end-of-life care for people with dementia. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 199, 357359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sampson, E. L., Stringer, A. and La Frenais, F. et al. (2019). Agitation near the end of life with dementia: an ethnographic study of care. PLoS One, 14, e0224043.10.1371/journal.pone.0224043CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHO. (2020). Framework for decision-making: implementation of mass vaccination campaigns in the context of COVID-19. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/framework-for-decision-making-implementation-of-mass-vaccination-campaigns-in-the-context-of-covid-19; last accessed 17 June 2020.Google Scholar