Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T17:28:44.248Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

FC23: Dementia and Triadic (Doctor-Patient-Carer) Interactions in Primary Care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2024

C. Balsinha
Affiliation:
CHRC, NOVA Medical School, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
F. Barreiros
Affiliation:
CHRC, NOVA Medical School, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
M.J. Marques
Affiliation:
CHRC, National School of Public Health, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
S. Dias
Affiliation:
CHRC, National School of Public Health, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
S. Iliffe
Affiliation:
University College London, United Kingdom
M. Gonçalves-Pereira
Affiliation:
CHRC, NOVA Medical School, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

Primary care visits of persons with dementia often bring together triads composed of patients, family carers and general practitioners (GPs), as previously discussed (1). Communication dynamics potentially affect dementia outcomes, not least because primary care is a health setting where these triad encounters often occur naturally. Our aim is to present further data from Portuguese primary care consultations with persons with dementia, their carers and GPs.

Methods:

We refer to the conclusion of our study ‘Dementia in Primary Care: the Patient, the Carer and the Doctor in the Medical Encounter - Bayer Investigation Grant | NOVAsaúde Ageing 2018’ (1). Fieldwork was interrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic and resumed in 2022. Sixteen consultations with persons with dementia, their carers and GPs (purposive sampling) were audio- recorded and transcribed verbatim. Interactions were thematically analysed using NVIVO® software. The analytical framework combined codes derived from the transcripts with codes from the literature.

Results:

Dementia-related content took up less than half of consultations’ time, despite their considerable length (as compared to the average in primary care). Most GPs assessments lacked breadth, although efforts towards positive attitudes were present. Themes specifically related to social health in dementia were not (or were poorly) covered. Frequently, carers facilitated GPs’ assessment of dementia consequences, but their own needs were neglected. Patients’ self-expression tended to be limited.

Discussion:

Our findings suggest that doctor-patient interactions in many GPs’ consultations seemingly compromise patient-centred approaches. There are challenges regarding how to assess the biopsychosocial consequences of dementia in a context of fragmented care (2,3). Given the scarcity of evidence from live-recorded primary care consultations about triadic dynamics, our findings are important to guide further explorations.

Type
Free/Oral Communications
Copyright
© International Psychogeriatric Association 2024

Footnotes

Presenting author: Manuel Gonçalves-Pereira (gpereira@nms.unl.pt)

References

Balsinha, , Iliffe, , Dias, , Gonçalves-Pereira, . Dementia in primary care and doctor-patient-carer interactions: Preliminary findings. 431 - poster presentation, IPA/International Psychogeriatric Association Virtual Congress, 2020. International Psychogeriatrics, 32(S1), 147147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balsinha, , et al. Dementia and primary care teams: obstacles to the implementation of Portugal’s Dementia Strategy. Primary Health Care Research and Development, 2022; 23, E10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balsinha, , Gonçalves-Pereira, , Dias, , Freitas, , Iliffe, . Consultation analysis of dementia triads in Portuguese General Practice: exploratory study. (2022, submitted)CrossRefGoogle Scholar