Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T11:46:32.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of morning bright light treatment for rest–activity disruption in institutionalized patients with severe Alzheimer's disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2005

Glenna A. Dowling
Affiliation:
University of California, San Francisco, CA, U.S.A.
Erin M. Hubbard
Affiliation:
Institute on Aging, Research Center, San Francisco, CA, U.S.A.
Judy Mastick
Affiliation:
Institute on Aging, Research Center, San Francisco, CA, U.S.A.
Jay S. Luxenberg
Affiliation:
The Jewish Home, San Francisco, CA, U.S.A.
Robert L. Burr
Affiliation:
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, U.S.A.
Eus J. W. Van Someren
Affiliation:
Netherlands Institute for Brain Research and VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

Background: Disturbances in rest–activity rhythm are prominent and disabling symptoms in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Nighttime sleep is severely fragmented and daytime activity is disrupted by multiple napping episodes. In most institutional environments, light levels are very low and may not be sufficient to enable the circadian clock to entrain to the 24-hour day. The purpose of this randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial was to test the effectiveness of morning bright light therapy in reducing rest–activity (circadian) disruption in institutionalized patients with severe AD.

Method: Subjects (n=46, mean age 84 years) meeting the NINCDS-ADRDA (National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke – the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association) AD diagnostic criteria were recruited from two large, skilled nursing facilities in San Francisco, California. The experimental group received one hour (09:30–10:30) of bright light exposure (≥2500lux in gaze direction) Monday through Friday for 10weeks. The control group received usual indoor light (150–200lux). Nighttime sleep efficiency, sleep time, wake time and number of awakenings and daytime wake time were assessed using actigraphy. Circadian rhythm parameters were also determined from the actigraphic data using cosinor analysis and nonparametric techniques. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test the primary study hypotheses.

Results and conclusion: Although significant improvements were found in subjects with aberrant timing of their rest–activity rhythm, morning bright light exposure did not induce an overall improvement in measures of sleep or the rest–activity in all treated as compared to control subjects. The results indicate that only subjects with the most impaired rest–activity rhythm respond significantly and positively to a brief (one hour) light intervention.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© International Psychogeriatric Association 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)