Hostname: page-component-588bc86c8c-pgks5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-11-30T11:10:48.135Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Confirmatory factor analysis of the Spanish version of the revised memory and behavior problems checklist

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2014

Celia Nogales-González ,
Andrés Losada  and
Rosa Romero-Moreno
Celia Nogales-González*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
Andrés Losada
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
Rosa Romero-Moreno
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Celia Nogales-González, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Departamental II Avda/Atenas s/n 28922, Alcorcón, Spain. Phone: +0034 914888912. Email: celia.nogales@urjc.es.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Behavioral and psychological symptoms of Dementia (BPSD) are a cause of significant stress in caregivers. The revised memory and behavior problems checklist (RMBPC) (Teri et al., 1992) is an instrument used for the assessment of BPSD. The psychometric properties of the RMBPC-Spanish version were analyzed.

Method:

361 family caregivers of people with dementia were interviewed individually. The RMBPC is a 24-item questionnaire that assesses both the frequency of the BPSD and the reaction they cause in the caregiver. It has three factors: memory problems, disruptive behaviors, and depressive behaviors. Caregivers’ depressive symptomatology, anxiety and burden, and the functional capacity of the person with dementia were also measured.

Results:

The results of a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) show that the original three-factor model with 24 items, with error covariances, had a marginally acceptable adjustment for the frequency and reaction scales. The deletion of items with low factor loadings results in a better adjustment of the data to the model, for both the frequency and reaction scales. We found adequate internal consistency for all subscales, and significant associations between the subscales, burden, anxiety, and depression.

Conclusions:

The results suggest that the Spanish version of the RMBPC shows adequate adjustment for the three-factor model with 24-items, but that removing some of the items improves the adjustment. The results support the use of this instrument for the assessment of BPSD in Spanish people with dementia.

Keywords

RMBPCbehavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD)confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)dementiacaregiving
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , April 2015 , pp. 683 - 692
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, R. S. et al. (2003). The revised memory and behavior problems checklist-nursing home: instrument development and measurement of burden among certified nursing assistants. Psychology and Aging, 18, 886.Google Scholar
Browne, M. W., Cudeck, R., Bollen, K. A. and Long, J. S. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage Focus Editions, 154, 136–136.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Canevelli, M. et al. (2013). Behavioral and psychological subsyndromes in Alzheimer's disease using the neuropsychiatric inventory. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 28, 795–803.Google Scholar
Coon, D. W. et al. (2004). Well-being, appraisal, and coping in Latina and Caucasian female dementia caregivers: findings from the REACH study. Aging & Mental Health, 8, 330–345.Google Scholar
Fauth, E. B. and Gibbons, A. (2013). Which behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia are the most problematic? Variability by prevalence, intensity, distress ratings, and associations with caregiver depressive symptoms. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Fidell, L. S. and Tabachnick, B. G. (2006). Using Multivariate Statistics. Using multivariate statistics. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 29, 263–271.Google Scholar
Finkel, S. I. and Burns, A. (2000). Introduction. International Psychogeriatrics, 12, 9–12.Google Scholar
Fuh, J.-L., Liu, C.-Y., Wang, S.-J., Wang, H.-C. and Liu, H. C. (1999). Revised memory and behavior problems checklist in Taiwanese patients with Alzheimer's disease. International Psychogeriatrics, 11, 181–189.Google Scholar
García-Alberca, J. M., Lara, J. P. and Berthier, M. L. (2011). Anxiety and depression in caregivers are associated with patient and caregiver characteristics in Alzheimer's disease. The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 41, 57–69.Google Scholar
González-Salvia, M. et al. (2011). Spanish revised memory and behavior problems checklist scale (SpRMBPC): trans-cultural adaptation and validation of the RMBPC questionnaire. International Psychogeriatrics, 23, 1160–1166.Google Scholar
Harwood, D. G., Barker, W.W., Ownby, R.L., Bravo, M., Aguero, H. and Duara, R. (2001). The behavior problems checklist-spanish: a preliminary study of a new scale for the assessment of depressive symptoms and disruptive behaviors in Hispanic patients with dementia. International Psychogeriatrics, 13, 23–35.Google Scholar
Hatch, D. J., DeHart, W. B. and Norton, M. C. (2013). Subjective stressors moderate effectiveness of a multi-component, multi-site intervention on caregiver depression and burden. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 29, 406–413.Google Scholar
Hinton, L., Haan, M., Geller, S. and Mungas, D. (2003). Neuropsychiatric symptoms in Latino elders with dementia or cognitive impairment without dementia and factors that modify their association with caregiver depression. The Gerontologist, 43, 669–677.Google Scholar
Hu, L. and Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. M., Wackerbarth, S. B. and Schmitt, F. A. (2001). Revised memory and behavior problems checklist. Clinical Gerontologist, 22, 87–108.Google Scholar
Kajiyama, B. et al. (2013). Exploring the effectiveness of an Internet-based program for reducing caregiver distress using the iCare Stress Management e-Training Program. Aging & Mental Health, 17, 544–554.Google Scholar
Logsdon, R. G., McCurry, S. M. and Teri, L. (2007). Evidence-based psychological treatments for disruptive behaviors in individuals with dementia. Psychology and Aging, 22, 28.Google Scholar
Losada, A. B., Puente, C. P., González, M. M. and Cigarán, M. (2008). Cuidar cuidándose. Evaluación e intervención interdisciplinar con cuidadores familiares de personas con demencia. Obra Social Caja Madrid.Google Scholar
Mahoney, F. I. (1965). Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 61–65.Google Scholar
Mausbach, B. T., Chattillion, E. A., Roepke, S. K., Patterson, T. L. and Grant, I. (2013). A comparison of psychosocial outcomes in elderly Alzheimer caregivers and noncaregivers. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21, 5–13.Google Scholar
McNair, D. M., Lorr, M. and DroppLemn, L. F. (1971). EITS manual for the profile of mood states (POMS). Educational and industrial testing service.Google Scholar
Ornstein, K. and Gaugler, J. E. (2012). The problem with “problem behaviors”: a systematic review of the association between individual patient behavioral and psychological symptoms and caregiver depression and burden within the dementia patient–caregiver dyad. International Psychogeriatrics, 24, 1536–1552.Google Scholar
Perdrix, S., de Roten, Y., Kolly, S. and Rossier, J. (2010). The psychometric properties of the WAI in a career counseling setting: comparison with a personal counseling sample. Journal of Career Assessment, 18, 409–419.Google Scholar
Pinquart, M. and Sörensen, S. (2003). Differences between caregivers and noncaregivers in psychological health and physical health: a meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 18, 250.Google Scholar
Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.Google Scholar
Romero-Moreno, R. et al. (2011). Analysis of the moderating effect of self-efficacy domains in different points of the dementia caregiving process. Aging & Mental Health, 15, 221–231.Google Scholar
Roth, D. R. et al. (2003). Psychometric analysis of the revised memory and behavior problems checklist: factor structure of occurrence and reaction ratings. Psychology and Aging, 18, 906–915.Google Scholar
Teri, L., Truax, P., Logsdon, R., Uomoto, J., Zarit, S. and Vitaliano, P.P. (1992). Assessment of behavioral problems in dementia: the revised memory and behavior problems checklist. Psychology and Aging, 7, 622–631.Google Scholar
Voisin, T., Andrieu, S., Cantet, C. and Vellas, B. (2010). Predictive factors of hospitalizations in Alzheimer's disease: a two-year prospective study in 686 patients of the REAL.FR study. The Journal of Nutrition Health and Aging, 14, 288–291. doi:10.1007/s12603-010-0063-4.Google Scholar
Weiner, M. F. et al. (2000). Quantifying behavioral disturbance in Alzheimer's disease patients. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 34, 163–167.Google Scholar
Zarit, S. H., Reever, K. E. and Bach-Peterson, J. (1980). Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden. The Gerontologist, 20, 649–655.Google Scholar
Zaudig, M. (1996). Assessing behavioral symptoms of dementia of the Alzheimer type: categorical and quantitative approaches. International Psychogeriatrics, 8, 183–200.Google Scholar