Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T23:31:59.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performing International Systems: Two East-Asian Alternatives to the Westphalian Order

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2012

Erik Ringmar
Erik Ringmar
Affiliation:
Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. E-mail: erik@ringmar.net
Get access

Abstract

This article provides a framework for the comparative study of international systems. By analyzing how international systems are framed, scripted, and performed, it is possible to understand how interstate relations are interpreted in different historical periods and parts of the world. But such an investigation also has general implications—inter alia for a study of the nature of power, the role of emotions in foreign policymaking, and public opinion formation. Case studies are provided by the Sino-centric, the Tokugawa, and the Westphalian systems. As this study shows, the two East Asian systems were in several respects better adapted than the Westphalian to the realities of international politics in the twenty-first century.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 66 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 1 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adler, Emanuel. 1997. Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics. European Journal of International Relations 3 (3):319–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel. 2010. Damned if You Do, Damned if You Don't, “Performative Power,” and the Strategy of Conventional and Nuclear Defusing. Security Studies 19 (2):199–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 1988. Action and Its Environments: Towards and New Synthesis. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2006a. Cultural Pragmatics: Social Performance Between Ritual and Strategy. In Social Performance: Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual, edited by Alexander, Jeffrey C., Giesen, Bernhard, and Mast, Jason L., 29–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2006b. From the Depths of Despair: Performance, Counterperformance, and ‘September 11.’ In Social Performance: Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual, edited by Alexander, Jeffrey C., Giesen, Bernhard, and Mast, Jason L., 91–114. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C., and Smith, Philip. 2001. The Strong Program in Cultural Theory: Elements of a Structural Hermeneutics. In Handbook of Sociological Theory, edited by Turner, Jonathan H., 135–50. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Apter, David E. 2006. Politics as Theatre: An Alternative View of the Rationalities of Power. In Social Performance: Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual, edited by Alexander, Jeffrey C., Giesen, Bernhard, and Mast, Jason L., 218–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aroney, Nicholas. 2007. Subsidiarity, Federalism and the Best Constitution: Thomas Aquinas on City, Province and Empire. Law and Philosophy 26 (2):161–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auslin, Michael R. 2006. Negotiating with Imperialism: The Unequal Treaties and the Culture of Japanese Diplomacy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert, and Keohane, Robert O.. 1985. Achieving Cooperation Under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions. World Politics 38 (1):226–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beer, Francis A., and de Landtsheer, Christ'l, eds. 2004. Metaphorical World Politics. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
Berenskoetter, Felix, and Williams, Michael J., eds. 2007. Power in World Politics. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bially Mattern, Janice. 2007. Why “Soft Power” Isn't So Soft: Representational Force and Attraction in World Politics. In Power in World Politics, edited by Berenskoetter, Felix and Williams, Michael J., 98–119. Abingdon, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blatter, Joachim. 2009. Performing Symbolic Politics and International Environmental Regulation: Tracing and Theorizing a Causal Mechanism Beyond Regime Theory. Global Environmental Politics 9 (4):81–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleiker, Roland, and Hutchison, Emma. 2008. Fear No More: Emotions and World Politics. Review of International Studies 34 (S1):115–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozeman, Adda B. 1960. Politics and Culture in International History: From the Ancient Near East to the Opening of the Modern Age. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Braam, André Everard van. 1798. An Authentic Account of the Embassy of the Dutch East-India Company, to the Court of the Emperor of China, in the Years 1974 and 1795. London: R. Phillips.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley. 1995 [1977]. The Anarchical Society. 2d ed. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley, and Watson, Adam, eds. 1984. The Expansion of International Society. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Burke, Peter. 2005. Performing History: The Importance of Occasions. Rethinking History: Journal of Theory and Practice 9 (1):35–52.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, and Little, Richard. 2000. International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, and Little, Richard. 2009. Introduction to the 2009 Reissue. In The Evolution of International Society: A Comparative Historical Analysis, edited by Watson, Adam, ix–xxxii. Abingdon, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
Campbell, David. 1998. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Rev. ed.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Cannadine, David. 2001. Ornamentalism: How the British Saw Their Empire. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carver, Terrell, and Pikalo, Jernej, eds. 2008. Political Language and Metaphor: Interpreting and Changing the World. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christian, Lynda Gregorian. 1987. Theatrum Mundi: The History of an Idea. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Chun, Allen J. 1989. The Ching Tribute System as Guest Ritual: A Preliminary Description. In Proceedings on the Second International Conference on Sinology, 169–208. Taipei, Taiwan: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Colley, Linda. 2004. Captives: Britain, Empire, and the World, 1600–1850. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Crawford, Neta C. 2000. The Passion of World Politics: Propositions on Emotions and Emotional Relationships. International Security 24 (4):116–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crossley, Pamela K. 1999. A Translucent Mirror: History and Identity in Qing Imperial Ideology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. 2000. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: Experiencing Flow in Work and Play. 25th ed.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1957. The Concept of Power. Behavioral Science 2 (3):201–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Steven. 1991. Introduction. In Pragmatics: A Reader, edited by Davis, Steven, 1–15. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Quincey, Thomas. 1897. The Chinese Question in 1857. In The Collected Writings of Thomas De Quincey. Vol. 14, Miscellanea and Index, edited by Masson, David, 345–67. London: A & C Black.Google Scholar
Dessler, David. 1989. What's at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate? International Organization 43 (3):441–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drulák, Petr. 2006. Motion, Container and Equilibrium: Metaphors in the Discourse about European Integration. European Journal of International Relations 12 (4):499–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duyvendak, J.J.L. 1938. The Last Dutch Embassy in the “Veritable Records.” T'oung Pao 34 (3):223–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, Mark C. 2000. The Limits of Tartary: Manchuria in Imperial and National Geographies. Journal of Asian Studies 59 (3):603–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, Mark C. 2001. The Manchu Way: The Eight Banners and Ethnic Identity in Late Imperial China. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Elliott, Mark C. 2009. Emperor Qianlong: Son of Heaven, Man of the World. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Ericson, Mark D. 1979. The Bakufu Looks Abroad: The 1865 Mission to France. Monumenta Nipponica 34 (4):383–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairbank, John K. 1942. Tributary Trade and China's Relations with the West. Far Eastern Quarterly 1 (2):129–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairbank, John K., and Teng, S.Y.. 1941. On the Ch'ing Tributary System. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 6 (2):135–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortune, Robert. 1868. Yedo and Peking: A Narrative of a Journey to the Capitals of Japan and China. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Foster, John Watson. 1906. The Practice of Diplomacy as Illustrated in the Foreign Relations of the United States. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Co.Google Scholar
Franko, Mark. 2003. Majestic Drag: Monarchical Performativity and the King's Body Theatrical. TDR: Drama Review 47 (2):71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frye, Northrop. 1971. Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1980. Negara: The Theatre State in Nineteenth-Century Bali. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1985. “From the Native's Point of View”: On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding. In Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology, 55–70. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Giesen, Bernhard. 2006. Performing the Sacred: A Durkheimian Perspective on the Performative Turn in the Social Sciences. In Social Performance: Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual, edited by Alexander, Jeffrey C., Giesen, Bernhard, and Mast, Jason L., 325–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1986. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Grimm, Jürgen. 2002. Ballets Danced in Münster: François Ogier, Dramatist. Dance Research 20 (2):27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano. 2000. A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 6 (2):147–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, John W. 1974. Rule by Status in Tokugawa Japan. Journal of Japanese Studies 1 (1):39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, John W. 1991. The Bakuhan System. In The Cambridge History of Japan. Vol. 4, Early Modern Japan, edited by Hall, John Whitney, 128–82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Fred. 2011. Shocked and Awed: A Dictionary of the War on Terror. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Heeren, Arnold H.L. 1846. A Manual of the History of the Political System of Europe and Its Colonies, from Its Formation at the Close of the Fifteenth Century, to Its Re-Establishment upon the Fall of Napoleon. London: H.G. Bohn.Google Scholar
Hevia, James L. 1995. Cherishing Men from Afar: Qing Guest Ritual and the Macartney Embassy of 1793. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Hevia, James L. 2003. English Lessons: The Pedagogy of Imperialism in Nineteenth-Century China. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Hopf, Ted. 1998. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security 23 (1):171–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huizinga, Johan. 1988. Homo Ludens: Essai sur la Fonction Sociale du Jeu. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew. 2002. “There Are No Rules” (George W. Bush): International Order After September 11. International Relations 16 (2):185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikegami, Eiko. 1995. The Taming of the Samurai: Honorific Individualism and the Making of Modern Japan. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jansen, Marius B. 2002. The Making of Modern Japan. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jewett, Robert, and Lawrence, John Shelton. 2004. Captain America and the Crusade against Evil: The Dilemma of Zealous Nationalism. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Kaempfer, Engelbert. 1906. The History of Japan: Together with a Description of the Kingdom of Siam, 1690–92. Vol. 1–4. Glasgow, Scotland: James MacLehose.Google Scholar
Kang, David C. 2007. China Rising: Peace, Power, and Order in East Asia. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kang, David C. 2010a. East Asia Before the West: Five Centuries of Trade and Tribute. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kang, David C. 2010b. Hierarchy and Legitimacy in International Systems: The Tribute System in Early Modern East Asia. Security Studies 19 (4):591–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1999. Transnational Advocacy Networks in International and Regional Politics. International Social Science Journal 51 (159):89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keen, Suzanne. 2006. A Theory of Narrative Empathy. Narrative 14 (3):207–36.Google Scholar
Kuus, Merje, and Agnew, John. 2008. Theorizing the State Geographically: Sovereignty, Subjectivity, Territoriality. In The Sage Handbook of Political Geography, edited by Cox, Kevin R., Low, Murray, and Robinson, Jennifer, 117–32. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, John Shelton, and Jewett, Robert. 2002. The Myth of the American Superhero. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Lindemann, Thomas, and Ringmar, Erik, eds. 2011. The Struggle for Recognition in International Relations. Boulder, Colo.: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Linklater, Andrew, and Suganami, Hidemi. 2006. The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Lydia H. 2006. The Clash of Empires: The Invention of China in Modern World Making. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lorimer, M.J. 1884. La doctrine de la Reconnaissance: Fondement du Droit International. Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 16 (1):333–59.Google Scholar
Lukes, Steven. 2005. Power: A Radical View. 2d ed.Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macartney, George. 1908. Our First Ambassador to China: An Account of the Life of George, Earl of Macartney, edited by Robbins, Helen Henrietta Macartney. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Marks, Michael P. 2011. Metaphors in International Relations Theory. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattingly, Garrett. 1937. The First Resident Embassies: Mediaeval Italian Origins of Modern Diplomacy. Speculum 12 (4):423–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, George Herbert. 1962 [1934]. Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist, edited by Morris, Charles W.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan. 2005. Rationality and Psychology in International Politics. International Organization 59 (1):77–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan. 2010. Emotional Beliefs. International Organization 64 (1):1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neufeld, Mark. 1993. Interpretation and the “Science” of International Relations. Review of International Studies 19 (1):39–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. Jr. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Lassa. 1912. International Law: A Treatise. Vol. 1. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Orgel, Stephen. 1975. The Illusion of Power: Political Theater in the English Renaissance. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osiander, Andreas. 2001. Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth. International Organization 55 (2):251–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osiander, Andreas. 2007. Before the State: Systemic Political Change in the West from the Greeks to the French Revolution. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepper, Stephen C. 1961. World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Perry, Matthew Calbraith. 1856. Narrative of the Expedition of an American Squadron to the China Seas and Japan: Performed in the Years 1852, 1853, and 1854, Under the Command of Commodore M.C. Perry, United States Navy. New York: D. Appleton.Google Scholar
Pritchard, Earl H. 1943. The Kotow in the Macartney Embassy to China in 1793. Far Eastern Quarterly 2 (2):163–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinow, Paul, and Sullivan, William M., eds. 1987. The Interpretive Turn: A Second Look. In Interpretive Social Science: A Second Look, 1–31. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ravina, Mark. 1995. State-Building and Political Economy in Early-Modern Japan. Journal of Asian Studies 54 (4):997–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Anthony. 1990. The Seventeenth-Century Crisis in Southeast Asia. Modern Asian Studies 24 (4):639–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rey, Alain. 2000. Performance. In Dictionnaire Historique de la Langue Française, edited by Rey, Alain. 3d ed.Paris: Le Robert.Google Scholar
Ringmar, Erik. 2006. Inter-Textual Relations: The Quarrel over the Iraq War as a Conflict Between Narrative Types. Cooperation and Conflict 41 (4):403–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringmar, Erik. 2008 [1996]. Identity, Interest, and Action: A Cultural Explanation of Sweden's Intervention in the Thirty Years War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ringmar, Erik. Forthcoming. Liberal Barbarism: The European Destruction of the Palace of the Emperor of China. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2000. “Let's Argue!”: Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization 54 (1):1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockhill, William W. 1905. Diplomatic Audiences at the Court of China. London: Luzac.Google Scholar
Ross, Andrew A.G. 2006. “Coming in From the Cold”: Constructivism and Emotions. European Journal of International Relations 12 (2):197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1993. Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations. International Organization 47 (1):139–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satow, Ernest Mason. 1917. A Guide to Diplomatic Practice. Vol. 1. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Scheff, Thomas J. 1994. Bloody Revenge: Emotions, Nationalism, and War. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Scott, David. 2009. China and the International System, 1840–1949: Power, Presence, and Perceptions in a Century of Humiliation. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Staunton, George. 1797. An Authentic Account of an Embassy from the King of Great Britain to the Emperor of China. 3 vols.London: W. Bulmer.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Shogo. 2005. Japan's Socialization into Janus-Faced European International Society. European Journal of International Relations 11 (1):137–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Shogo. 2009. Civilization and Empire: China and Japan's Encounter with the European International Society. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thunberg, Carl Peter. 1794. Voyage en Afrique et en Asie, Principalement au Japon, Pendant les Années 1770–1779. Paris: Chez Fuchs.Google Scholar
Toby, Ronald P. 1977. Reopening the Question of Sakoku: Diplomacy in the Legitimation of the Tokugawa Bakufu. Journal of Japanese Studies 3 (2):323–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toby, Ronald P. 1991. State and Diplomacy in Early Modern Japan: Asia in the Development of the Tokugawa Bakufu. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Victor. 1975. Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors: Symbolic Action in Human Society. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor. 2001. From Ritual to Theatre: The Human Seriousness of Play. New York: PAJ Publications.Google Scholar
Ullman, Harlan K., and Wade, James P.. 1996. Shock and Awe: Achieving Rapid Dominance. Washington, D.C: National Defense University Press.Google Scholar
Vaporis, Constantine N. 1997. To Edo and Back: Alternate Attendance and Japanese Culture in the Early Modern Period. Journal of Japanese Studies 23 (1):25–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaporis, Constantine N. 2005. Lordly Pageantry: The Daimyo Procession and Political Authority. Japan Review 17:3–54.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Wang, Tseng-Tsai. 1971. The Audience Question: Foreign Representatives and the Emperor of China, 1858–1873. Historical Journal 14 (3):617–26.Google Scholar
Watson, Adam. 2009 [1992]. The Evolution of International Society: A Comparative Historical Analysis. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Richard A. 2004. Descartes's Ballet: His Doctrine of Will and Political Philosophy. South Bend, Ind.: St. Augustine's Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Cynthia. 1998. Performative States. Millennium 27 (1):77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weimann, Gabriel. 2005. The Theater of Terror. The Psychology of Terrorism and the Mass Media. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma 9 (3-4):379–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1992. Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization 46 (2):391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Hayden. 1975. Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Wight, Martin. 1977. Systems of States. Leicester, England: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Frederick Wells. 1912. Anson Burlingame and the First Chinese Mission to Foreign Powers. New York: Scribner's.Google Scholar
Wills, John E. Jr. 1984. Embassies and Illusions: Dutch and Portuguese Envoys to K'ang-hsi, 1666–1687. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Asia Center.Google Scholar
Winichakul, Thongchai. 1997. Siam Mapped: A History of the Geo-Body of a Nation. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2001. Philosophical Investigations. 3d ed. Translated by Anscombe, G.E.M.. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolseley, Garnet. 1862. Narrative of the War with China in 1860; to Which Is Added the Account of a Short Residence with the Tai-Ping Rebels at Nankin and a Voyage from Thence to Hankow. London: Longman, Green, Longman, and Roberts.Google Scholar
Woodward, David. 1985. Reality, Symbolism, Time, and Space in Medieval World Maps. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 75 (4):510–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonemoto, Marcia. 2000. The “Spatial Vernacular” in Tokugawa Maps. Journal of Asian Studies 59 (3):647–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Yongjin. 1991. China's Entry into International Society: Beyond the Standard of ‘Civilization.’ Review of International Studies 17 (1):3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Yongjin. 2001. System, Empire and State in Chinese International Relations. Review of International Studies 27 (5):43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar