Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T14:57:15.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Governments and Airlines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Robert L. Thornton
Get access

Extract

Air transport across national boundaries has increased greatly in scope and intensity since the end of World War II. Although the vast majority of such transport involves private individuals and corporations, governments play a major role in the process. They act as producers, consumers, and regulators of air transport; they have become one of the primary actors in the process. The participation of governments has greatly modified the environment and processes through which carriage is accomplished. Governments have been involved in the establishment of such organizations as die International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), a supranational organization in a narrowly limited way, and the International Air Transport Association (IATA), an international association of airlines, many of which are, in fact, owned or controlled by governments.

Type
Articles
Information
International Organization , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , Summer 1971 , pp. 541 - 553
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lissitzyn, Oliver James, International Air Transport and National Policy (Studies in American Foreign Relations, No. 3) (New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 1942), p. 316Google Scholar.

2 World Airline Record (6th ed.; Chicago: Roadcap & Associates, Publishers, 1965), pp. 25–26Google Scholar.

3 Report on the Scandinavian Airlines Systems (SAS) (ICAO Circular 30-AT/5) (Montreal: International Civil Aviation Organization, 1953)Google Scholar.

4 “Results of the Anglo-American Civil Aviation Conference: Joint Statement by the U.K. and U.S. Delegations,” Department of State Bulletin, 02 24, 1946 (Vol. 14, No. 347), pp. 302–306Google Scholar.

5 “IATA Fare Chaos Could Force Governments to Negotiate Rates,” Aviation Week and Space Technology, 04 22, 1963 (Vol. 78, No. 16), p. 41Google Scholar.

6 As reported in “Industry Observer,” Aviation Week, and Space Technology, 07 27, 1970 (Vol. 93, No. 4), p. 11Google Scholar.

7 “Austrian Airlines to Scrap Domestic Routes,” Aviation Week and Space Technology, 02 2, 1970 (Vol. 92, No. 5), p. 38Google Scholar.

8 Wright, Ward, “Air Afrique Emphasizes Measured Growth,” Aviation Week and Space Technology, 11 29, 1965 (Vol. 83, No. 22), p. 30Google Scholar.

9 “U.S., Australia Agree on Capacity Limits,” Aviation Week, and Space Technology, 07 13, 1970 (Vol. 93, No. 2), p. 25Google Scholar.

10 Hall, Melvin and Peck, Walter, “Wings for the Trojan Horse,” Foreign Affairs, 01 1941 (Vol. 19, No. 2), pp. 347–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 “Pilots, ATA Battle on Separation Rulings,” Aviation Week and Space Technology, 04 25, 1966 (Vol. 84, No. 17), p. 36Google Scholar.

12 “120-mi. Aircraft Lateral Separation Restored to Ease Traffic Problem,” Aviation Week and Space Technology, 06 20, 1966 (Vol. 84, No. 25), p. 35Google Scholar.

13 “Airlines Gird to Match Alitalia Cuts,” Aviation Week, and Space Technology, 09 29, 1969 (Vol. 91, No. 13), p. 30Google Scholar.

14 Doty, Laurence, “Policy, Politics Block Micronesia Award,” Aviation Week and Space Technology, 07 6, 1970 (Vol. 93, No. 1), p. 27Google Scholar.

15 “News Digest,” Aviation Week and Space Technology, 07 27, 1970 (Vol. 93, No. 4), p. 22Google Scholar; and ”BOAC Ordered to Give Certain Routes to Proposed New Carrier,” Aviation Week and Space Technology, 08 10, 1970 (Vol. 93, No. 6), p. 32Google Scholar.