Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T13:05:18.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cultural Diversity and International Order

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2017

Christian Reus-Smit
Get access

Abstract

The modern international order faces profound challenges. Power is shifting to non-Western states and diffusing to non-state actors, including transnational insurgents. This is more than a power transition: it also about culture. Western states now share the stage with powers such as China who bring their own cultural values, practices, and histories, and new forms of transnational violence are justified in the name of religious identity and belief. Some see this as a fundamental threat to modern international order, an order created by and for the West. Others see the “liberal” order as uniquely able to accommodate states and peoples of diverse cultures. How well equipped is IR to contribute to these debates? I review four recent works on the future of the modern international order, asking what conceptual, theoretical, and empirical resources they offer for understanding the relationship between cultural diversity and international order. This literature suffers from four limitations: culture is essentialized or bracketed; institutions are seen as either simple expressions of cultural values or structures that neutralize culture, with their recognition function ignored; the structural power of international orders—how they produce political and cultural subjectivities—is underappreciated; and international orders are conceived too narrowly as orders of sovereign states. To overcome these limitations, I advance a new perspective on cultural diversity and international order. International orders evolve in heterogeneous cultural contexts, and the governance of diversity is a key imperative of order building. In response, international orders develop diversity regimes: institutional norms and practices that define legitimate units of political authority, authorize certain forms of cultural difference, and relate the two. These regimes are essential to the legitimacy of international orders, but face two interrelated pressures for change: shifts in underlying material capabilities, and new claims for cultural recognition, often rooted in grievances against past or prevailing forms of recognition.

Type
Review Essay
Information
International Organization , Volume 71 , Issue 4 , Fall 2017 , pp. 851 - 885
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, Amitav. 2014. The End of the American World Order. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Anghie, Antony. 2005. Imperialism, Sovereignty, and the Making of International Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1973. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harvest Books.Google Scholar
Barkey, Karen. 2008. Empire of Difference: The Ottomans in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael, and Duvall, Raymond. 2005. Power in International Relations. International Organization 59 (1):39–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrey, Ellen. 2015. The Enigma of Diversity: The Language of Race and the Limits of Racial Justice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bially Mattern, Janice. 2005. Ordering International Politics: Identity, Crisis, and Representational Force. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bially Mattern, Janice, and Zarakol, Ayşe. 2016. Hierarchies in World Politics. International Organization 70 (3):623–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, Tony. 2014. Religious Difference, Not Ideology, Will Fuel this Century's Epic Battles. The Guardian, 26 January. Available at <http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/25/religious-difference-ideology-conflicts-middle-east-tony-blair>. Accessed 19 February 2014.. Accessed 19 February 2014.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Blair,+Tony.+2014.+Religious+Difference,+Not+Ideology,+Will+Fuel+this+Century's+Epic+Battles.+The+Guardian,+26+January.+Available+at+.+Accessed+19+February+2014.>Google Scholar
Bozeman, Adda. 1971. The Future of Law in a Multicultural World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Braude, Benjamin. 2014. Christians and Jews in the Ottoman Empire. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Brooks, Stephen G. and Wohlforth, William C.. 2016. The Once and Future Superpower: Why China Won't Overtake the United States. Foreign Affairs (May/June 2016). <https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2016-04-13/once-and-future-superpower>. Accessed 19 September 2016.. Accessed 19 September 2016.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Brooks,+Stephen+G.+and+Wohlforth,+William+C..+2016.+The+Once+and+Future+Superpower:+Why+China+Won't+Overtake+the+United+States.+Foreign+Affairs+(May/June+2016).+.+Accessed+19+September+2016.>Google Scholar
Bukovansky, Mlada, Clark, Ian, Eckersley, Robyn, Price, Richard, Reus-Smit, Christian, and Wheeler, Nicholas J.. 2012. Special Responsibilities: Global Problems and American Power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Edmund. 1908. Speeches and Letters on American Affairs. London: J.M. Dent and Sons.Google Scholar
Cameron, Euan. 2012. The European Reformation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
House, Chatham. 2015. Challenges to the Rules-Based International Order: London Conference 2015 Background Paper. Available at <https://www.chathamhouse.org/london-conference-2015/background-papers/challenges-to-rules-based-international-order>. Accessed 19 September 2016..+Accessed+19+September+2016.>Google Scholar
Chwe, Michael Suk-Young. 2001. Rational Ritual: Culture, Coordination, and Common Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Ian. 2011. Hegemony in International Society. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Claude, Inis Jr. 1966. Collective Legitimation as a Political Function of the United Nations. International Organization 20 (3):367–69.Google Scholar
Comaroff, John and Comaroff, Jean. 1992. Ethnography and the Historical Imagination. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Crossley, Pamela Kyle. 2002. A Translucent Mirror: History and Identity in Qing Imperial Ideology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Crossley, Pamela Kyle. 2006. Making Mongols. In Empire at the Margins: Culture, Ethnicity, and Frontier in Early Modern China, edited by Crossley, Pamela Kyle, Siu, Helen F., and Sutton, Donald S., 58–84. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Goh, Evelyn. 2013. The Struggle for Order: Hegemony, Hierarchy, and Transition in Post-Cold War East Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hannerz, Ulf. 1992. Cultural Complexity. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hannerz, Ulf. 2010. Diversity Is Our Business. American Anthropologist 112 (4):539–51.Google Scholar
Harrison, Peter. 2007. The Fall of Man and the Foundations of Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hao, Shiyuan. 2012. Ethnicities and Ethnic Relations. In Chinese Society: Change and Transformation, edited by Peilin, Li, 86–107. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Honneth, . 1995. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1997. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Touchstone Books.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2011. Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert. 1990. Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Third World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert. 2000. The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacques, Martin. 2012. When China Rules the World: The End of the Western World and the Birth of a New Global Order. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Kang, David C. 2010. East Asia Before the West: Five Centuries of Trade and Tribute. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., ed. 1996. The Culture of National Security. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., ed. 2010. Civilizations in World Politics. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry. 1957. A World Restored: Metternich, Castlereagh, and the Problems of Peace, 1812–1822. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry. 2014. World Order: Reflections on the Character of Nations and the Course of History. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Klotz, Audie. 1995. Norms in International Relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kukathas, Chandran. 1998. Liberalism and Multiculturalism: The Politics of Indifference. Political Theory 26 (5):686–99.Google Scholar
Kupchan, Charles A. 2012. No One's World: The West, The Rising Rest, and the Coming Global Turn. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. New York: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 2007. Multicultural Odysseys: Navigating the New International Politics of Diversity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laitin, David. 1986. Hegemony and Culture: Politics and Religious Change Among the Yoruba. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Lake, David. 2009. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Malik, Kenan. 2015. The Failure of Multiculturalism. Foreign Affairs 94 (2):21–22.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of the Great Powers. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2001. Changing Rights, Changing Culture. In Culture and Rights: Anthropological Perspectives, edited by Cowan, Jane K., Dembour, Marie-Benedicte, and Wilson, Richard A., 31–55. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2009. Gender Violence: A Cultural Perspective. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nardin, Terry. 1983. Law, Morality, and Relations of States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nasr, Vali. 2013. The Dispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy in Retreat. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Obama, Barack. 2014. Remarks by President Obama in Address to the United Nations General Assembly, 24 September. Available at <https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/09/24/remarks-president-obama-address-united-nations-general-assembly>. Accessed 19 September 2016..+Accessed+19+September+2016.>Google Scholar
O'Neill, Barry. 1999. Honor, Symbols, and War. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Patten, Alan. 2014. Equal Recognition: The Moral Foundations of Minority Rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Andrew. 2011. War, Religion, and Empire: The Transformation of International Orders. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Andrew, and Sharman, Jason. 2015. International Order in Diversity: War, Trade and Rule in the Indian Ocean. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Price, Richard. 1997. The Chemical Weapons Taboo. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 1997. The Constitutional Structure of International Society and the Nature of Fundamental Institutions. International Organization 51 (4):555–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 1999. The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2013. Individual Rights and the Making of the International System. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudd, Kevin. 2012. The West Isn't Ready for the Rise of China. New Statesman, 11 July. Available at <http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/international-politics/2012/07/kevin-rudd-west-isnt-ready-rise-china>. Accessed 19 September 2016.. Accessed 19 September 2016.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Rudd,+Kevin.+2012.+The+West+Isn't+Ready+for+the+Rise+of+China.+New+Statesman,+11+July.+Available+at+.+Accessed+19+September+2016.>Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1983. Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis. World Politics 35 (2):261–285.Google Scholar
Shakman Hurd, Elizabeth. 2009. The Politics of Secularism in International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shakman Hurd, Elizabeth. 2015. Beyond Religious Freedom: The New Global Politics of Religion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Suchman, Mark. 1995. Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review 30 (3):571–610.Google Scholar
Swidler, Ann. 1986. Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies. American Sociological Review 51 (2):273–86.Google Scholar
Swidler, Ann. 2003. Talk of Love: How Culture Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tannenwald, Nina. 2007. The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Non-Use of Nuclear Weapons Since 1945. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan. 1993. On Human Diversity: Nationalism, Racism, and Exoticism in French Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tully, James. 1995. Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vertovec, Steven. 2007. Super-Diversity and Its Implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies 30 (6):1024–54.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1964. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1994. Collective Identity Formation and the International State. American Political Science Review 88 (2):384–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wight, Martin. 1977. Systems of States. Leicester, UK: University of Leicester Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Eric R. 1982. Europe and the People Without History. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Yan, Xuetong. 2011. Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power. Edited by Bell, Daniel and Zhe, Sun. Translated by Ryden, Edmund. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zarakol, Ayşe. 2011. After Defeat: How the East Learned to Live with the West. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar