Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5959bf8d4d-9w8k4 Total loading time: 0.446 Render date: 2022-12-08T04:11:33.213Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Challenges to the Liberal Order: Reflections on International Organization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2021

Get access

Abstract

As International Organization commemorates its seventy-fifth anniversary, the Liberal International Order (LIO) that authors in this journal have long analyzed is under challenge, perhaps as never before. The articles in this issue explore the nature of these challenges by examining how the Westphalian order and the LIO have co-constituted one another over time; how both political and economic dynamics internal to the LIO threaten its core aspects; and how external threats combine with these internal dynamics to render the LIO more fragile than ever before. This introduction begins by defining and clarifying what is “liberal,” “international,” and “orderly” about the LIO. It then discusses some central challenges to the LIO, illustrated by the contributors to this issue as well as other sources. Finally, we reflect on the analytical lessons we have learned—or should learn—as the study of the LIO, represented by scholarship in International Organization, has sometimes overlooked or marginalized dynamics that now appear central to the functioning, and dysfunction, of the order itself.

Type
Introduction
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, Amitav. 2014. The End of American World Order. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Barnett, Michael, eds. 1998. Security Communities. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Drieschova, Alena. 2021. The Epistemological Challenge of Truth Subversion to the Liberal International Order. International Organization 75 (2). <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000533>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. 2014. Stigma Management in International Relations: Transgressive Identities, Norms, and Order in International Society. International Organization 68 (1):143–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, and Zarakol, Ayşe. 2020. Struggles for Recognition: The Liberal International Order and the Merger of Its Discontents. International Organization 75 (2). <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000454>.Google Scholar
Anderson, Jeffrey J., Ikenberry, G. John, and Risse, Thomas, eds. 2008. The End of the West? Crisis and Change in the Atlantic Order. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert A. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ben-Achour, Sabri, Shin, Daniel, and Carolipio, Redmond. 2018. The Trump Administration Is Trying to “Effectively Kill” the WTO's Appellate Body. Marketplace, 18 October.Google Scholar
Bo, Ernesto Dal, Finan, Frederico, Folke, Olle, Persson, Torsten, and Rickne, Johanna. 2019. Economic Losers and Political Winners: Sweden's Radical Right. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanja A., and Risse, Thomas, eds. 2016. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börzel, Tanja A., and Risse, Thomas. 2020. Here We Go Again: The EU and the Covid-19 Crisis. SCRIPTS Blog, Berlin, <https://www.scripts-berlin.eu/blog/here-we-go-again-the-eu-and-the-covid-19-crisis_/>..>Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanja, and Zürn, Michael. 2021. Contestations of the Liberal International Order: From Liberal Multilateralism to Postnational Liberalism. International Organization 75 (2). <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000570>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinkley, John. 2018. Trump Is Close to Shutting Down the WTO's Appeals Court. Forbes, 27 September.Google Scholar
Broz, J. Lawrence, Frieden, Jeffry, and Weymouth, Stephen. 2021. Populism in Place: The Economic Geography of the Globalization Backlash. International Organization 75 (2). <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000314>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Búzás, Zoltán. 2021. Racism and Antiracism in the Liberal International Order. International Organization 75 (2). <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000521>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caraway, Teri L., Rickard, Stephanie J., and Anner, Mark S.. 2012. International Negotiations and Domestic Politics: The Case of IMF Labor Market Conditionality. International Organization 66 (1):2761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique, and Faletto, Enzo. 1979. Dependency and Development in Latin America. University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colgan, Jeff D. 2019. American Perspectives and Blind Spots on World Politics. Journal of Global Security Studies 4 (3):300309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colgan, Jeff D., Green, Jessica F., and Hale, Thomas N.. 2020. Asset Revaluation and the Existential Politics of Climate Change. International Organization 75 (2). <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000296>.Google Scholar
Cox, Robert W. 1987. Production, Power, and World Order. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Cramer, Katherine J. 2016. The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dai, Xinyuan. 2005. Why Comply? The Domestic Constituency Mechanism. International Organization 59 (2):363–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, Karl W., Burell, Sidney A., Kann, Robert A., Lee, Maurice Jr., Lichterman, Martin, Lindgren, Raymond E., Loewenheim, Francis L., and van Wagenen, Richard W.. 1957. Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
De Vries, Catherine E., Hobolt, Sara B. and Walter, Stefanie. 2021. Politicizing International Cooperation: The Mass Public, Political Entrepreneurs, and Political Opportunity Structures. International Organization 75 (2). <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000491>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Wilde, Peter, Koopmans, Ruud, Merkel, Wolfgang, Strijbis, Oliver, and Zürn, Michael, eds. 2019. The Struggle over Borders: Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncombe, Constance, and Dunne, Tim. 2018. After Liberal World Order. International Affairs 94 (1):2542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fariss, Christopher J. 2014. Respect for Human Rights Has Improved over Time: Modeling the Changing Standard of Accountability. American Political Science Review 108 (2):297318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Henry, and Newman, Abraham. 2020. Will the Coronavirus End Globalization As We Know It? The Pandemic Is Exposing Market Vulnerabilities No One Knew Existed. Foreign Affairs, 16 March.Google Scholar
Farrell, Henry, and Newman, Abraham L.. 2021. The Janus Face of the Liberal International Information Order: When Global Institutions Are Self-Undermining. International Organization 75 (2). <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000302>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1998. Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation. International Organization 52 (2):269305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4):887917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flaherty, Thomas M., and Rogowski, Ronald. 2021. Rising Inequality As a Threat to the Liberal International Order. International Organization 75 (2). <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818321000163>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1975. Three Models of the Future. International Organization 29 (1):3760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glanville, Luke. 2014. Sovereignty and the Responsibility to Protect: A New History. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith. 1988. Ideas, Institutions, and American Trade Policy. International Organization 42 (1):179217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Judith, and Gulotty, Robert. 2021. America and the Trade Regime: What Went Wrong? International Organization 75 (2). < https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081832000065X>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Judith L., Kahler, Miles, Keohane, Robert O., and Slaughter, Anne-Marie, eds. 2000. Legalization and World Politics. Special issue of International Organization 54 (3).Google Scholar
Goodman, Sara Wallace, and Pepinsky, Thomas B.. 2021. The Exclusionary Foundations of Embedded Liberalism. International Organization 75 (2). <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000478>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourevitch, Peter A. 1999. The Governance Problem in International Relations. In Strategic Choice in International Relations, edited by Lake, David A. and Powell, Robert, 137–64. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gowa, Joanne. 1994. Allies, Adversaries, and International Trade. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, Penny. 2015. Crisis, Austerity, and Gendered Governance: A Feminist Perspective. Feminist Review 109 (1):4971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haftendorn, Helga, Keohane, Robert O., and Wallander, Celeste A., eds. 1999. Imperfect Unions: Security Institutions over Time and Space. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, and Marks, Gary. 2015. Delegation and Pooling in International Organizations. Review of International Organizations 10 (3):305–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, and Marks, Gary. 2018. Cleavage Theory Meets Europe's Crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the Transnational Cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy 25 (1):109–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopgood, Stephen, Snyder, Jack, and Vinjamuri, Leslie, eds. 2017. Human Rights Futures. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutter, Swen, Grande, Edgar, and Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2016. Politicising Europe: Integration and Mass Politics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, Susan. 2011. The Pseudo-Democrat's Dilemma: Why Election Monitoring Became an International Norm. Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2012. Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2018. The End of Liberal International Order? International Affairs 94 (1):723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishay, Micheline R. 2008. The History of Human Rights: From Ancient Times to the Globalization Era. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jahn, Beate. 2018. Liberal Internationalism: Historical Trajectory and Current Prospects. International Affairs 94 (1):4361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain. 2007. Social States: China in International Institutions, 1980–2000. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain. 2017. Is Chinese Nationalism Rising? Evidence from Beijing. International Security 41 (3):743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahler, Miles. 1999. Evolution, Choice, and International Change. In Strategic Choice in International Relations, edited by Lake, David A. and Powell, Robert, 165–96. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kahler, Miles. 2013. Economic Crisis and Global Governance: The Stability of a Globalized World. In Politics in the New Hard Times: The Great Recession in Comparative Perspective, edited by Kahler, Miles and Lake, David A., 2751. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. (1795) 1983. Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch. In Immanual Kant: Perpetual Peace and Other Essays on Politics, History, and Morals, edited by Humphrey, Ted, 107–43. Hackett.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Morton A. 1957. System and Process in International Politics. Wiley.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., ed. 1978. Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States. Wisconsin University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. 1996. Cultural Norms and National Security: Police and Military in Postwar Japan. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kayaoglu, Turan. 2010. Westphalian Eurocentrism in International Relations Theory. International Studies Review 12 (2):193217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., and Nye, Joseph S. Jr., eds. 1971. Transnational Relations and World Politics. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, Charles P. 1973. The World in Depression, 1929–1939. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles, and Snidal, Duncan, eds. 2001. Rational Design: Explaining the Form of International Institutions. Special issue of International Organization 55 (4).Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D., ed. 1983. International Regimes. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1985. Structural Conflict: The Third World Against Global Liberalism. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1991. Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier. World Politics 43 (3):336–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1993. Sovereignty, Regimes, and Human Rights. In Regime Theory and International Relations, edited by Rittberger, Volker, 139–67. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kundnani, Hans 2017. What Is the Liberal International Order? Policy essay 17. German Marshall Fund of the United States, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 1993. Leadership, Hegemony, and the International Economy: Naked Emperor or Tattered Monarch with Potential? International Studies Quarterly 37 (4):459–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A. 1999. Entangling Relations: American Foreign Policy in Its Century. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A. 2018. Economic Openness and Great Power Competition: Lessons for China and the United States. Chinese Journal of International Politics 11 (1):237–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A., and Morgan, Patrick M., eds. 1997. Regional Orders: Building Security in a New World. Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward, and Rudra, Nita. 2021. Embedded Liberalism in the Digital Era. International Organization 75 (2). <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000569>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1998. The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders. International Organization 52 (4):943–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Lisa L. 1993. The Rational State Choice of Multilateralism. In Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Practice of an International Forum, edited by Ruggie, John Gerard, 91121. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa. 2017. International Institutions: Weak Commitment and Costly Signals. International Theory 9 (3):353–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Lisa L., and Simmons, Beth A.. 1998. Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions. International Organization 52 (4):729–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. 1990. Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security 15 (1):556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. Norton.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. 2019. Bound to Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order. International Security 43 (4):750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1948. Politics Among Nations. Brief edition, 1993. McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Morrison, Wayne M. 2018. China's Economic Rise: History, Trends, Challenges, and Implications for the United States. Report RL33534, Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Müller, Harald, Fischer, David, and Kötter, Wolfgang. 1994. Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Global Order. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Osiander, Andreas. 2001. Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth. International Organization 55 (2):251–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oye, Kenneth A., ed. 1986. Cooperation Under Anarchy. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Richard M. 1998. Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines. International Organization 52 (3):613–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2013. The Liberal International Order Reconsidered. In After Liberalism? The Future of Liberalism in International Relations, edited by Friedman, Rebekka, Oskanian, Kevork, and Pardo, Ramon Pacheco, 167–86. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas, ed. 1995a. Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures, and International Institutions. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1995b. Cooperation Among Democracies: The European Influence on US Foreign Policy. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodden, Jonathan A. 2019. Why Cities Lose: The Deep Roots of the Urban-Rural Political Divide. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rodrick, Dani. 2008. Second-Best Institutions. American Economic Review 98 (2):100–04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John G. 1983. International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order. In International Regimes, edited by Krasner, Stephen S., 195231. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John G. 1992. Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution. International Organization 46 (3):561–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, Bruce. 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce, and Oneal, John R.. 2001. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. Norton.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 1993. Human Rights, Principled Issue Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America. International Organization 47 (3):411–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2017a. Evidence for Hope: Making Human Rights Work in the Twenty-first Century. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2017b. Timing and Sequencing in International Politics: Latin America's Contributions to Human Rights. In International Politics and Institutions in Time, edited by Fioretos, Orfeo, 231–50. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., and Goemans, Hein. 2021. Built on Borders: Tensions with the Institution Liberalism (Thought It) Left Behind. International Organization 75 (2). <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000600>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jackie, Chatfield, Charles, and Pagnucco, Ron, eds. 1997. Transnational Social Movements and Global Politics: Solidarity Beyond the State. Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Solingen, Etel. 1998. Regional Orders at Century's Dawn: Global and Domestic Influences on Grand Strategy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E. 1994. Globalization and Its Discontents. Norton.Google Scholar
Tausendfreund, Rachel, Techau, Jan, and Kleine-Brockhoff, Thomas. 2020. Mind the Corona Trap: Why the Doomsday Scenarios for World Affairs Are Premature. Real Clear World, 16 April.Google Scholar
Tourinho, Marcos. 2021. The Co-Constitution of Order. International Organization 75 (2). < https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000466>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Towns, Ann E. 2010. Women and States: Norms and Hierarchies in International Society. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vattel, Emmerich de. (1834) 2011. The Law of Nations: Or, Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns, edited by Chitty, Joseph. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1979. The Capitalist World-Economy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Weiss, Jessica Chen. 2013. Authoritarian Signaling, Mass Audiences, and National Protest in China. International Organization 67 (1):135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Jessica Chen, and Wallace, Jeremy L.. 2021. Domestic Politics, China's Rise, and the Future of the Liberal International Order. International Organization 75 (2). <https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081832000048X>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 2018. A Theory of Global Governance: Authority, Legitimacy, and Contestation. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 2020. Drei Gründe, warum das Coronavirus die Globalisierung nicht beenden wird [Three Reasons Why the Coronavirus Won't End Globalization]. Der Tagesspiegel, 19 April 2020.Google Scholar
46
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Challenges to the Liberal Order: Reflections on International Organization
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Challenges to the Liberal Order: Reflections on International Organization
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Challenges to the Liberal Order: Reflections on International Organization
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *