No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: Mingtai Fire & Marine Insurance co., Ltd. v. United Parcel Service
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2017
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS002078290002009X/resource/name/firstPage-S002078290002009Xa.jpg)
- Type
- Judicial and Similar Proceedings
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1999
Footnotes
177 F.3d 1142 (9lh Cir. 1999).
References
Endnotes
1 Mingtai also brought state law claims for negligence which the district court held were preempted by federal law. Mingtai does not appeal that portion of the district court's ruling.
2 The history of the prior relations between the United States, China, and Taiwan has been exhaustively summarized elsewhere. See, e.g., New York Chinese TV Programs, Inc. v. U.E. Enterprises, Inc., 954 F.2d 847, 849-50 (2d Cir. 1992); Tzu-Wen Lee, The International Legal Status of the Republic of China on Taiwan, 1 UCLA J. Int'l L. & Foreign Aff. 351, 353-354 (1997).
3 Having done so, we deny UPS's Motion to Strike Plaintiff-Appellant's Request for Judicial Notice as moot.